similar to: [PATCH] fix storage problem.

This patch teaches taskomatic to use the volume 'key' instead of the path from libvirt to key the volume off of in the database. This fixes the duplicate iscsi volume bug we were seeing. The issue was that libvirt changed the way they name storage volumes and included a local ID that changed each time it was attached. Note that the first run with this new patch will cause duplicate

This patch uses the qpid migration call which requires the latest libvirt-qpid and libvirt. I also add a bunch of debug logging here which is switchable but I've left it on for now so all users will have this in their logs. Signed-off-by: Ian Main <imain at redhat.com> --- src/task-omatic/taskomatic.rb | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8

This patch adds more debug calling in storage related tasks. Signed-off-by: Ian Main <imain at redhat.com> --- src/task-omatic/task_storage.rb | 29 ++++++++++++++++++----------- src/task-omatic/taskomatic.rb | 18 +++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/task-omatic/task_storage.rb b/src/task-omatic/task_storage.rb index

This patch updates dbomatic, taskomatic and host-register to use the new C++ wrapped ruby QMF bindings. It also fixes a couple of bugs along the way including the 0 cpu bug for host-register. This is a compilation of work done by myself and Arjun Roy. Signed-off-by: Ian Main <imain at redhat.com> --- src/db-omatic/db_omatic.rb | 111 ++++++-------

I've rebased the patch series to the current next branch and am sending them again.

Hello R-users, I have the following problem, that I want to solve efficiently: I have a named list, for example: > l <- list(a = 1, b = 3, c = 'asd') > l $a [1] 1 $b [1] 3 $c [1] "asd" I know that I can iterate through it using lapply() function, but I would also like to able to get the list names or some attributes of l in the lapply(). For example if I use

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- src/app/controllers/storage_volume_controller.rb | 6 ++- src/app/services/storage_volume_service.rb | 60 ++++++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/app/controllers/storage_volume_controller.rb b/src/app/controllers/storage_volume_controller.rb index b89513a..fb6bc9c 100644 ---

Somehow I missed this.. this file is no longer in use by taskomatic. Signed-off-by: Ian Main <imain at redhat.com> --- src/task-omatic/utils.rb | 221 ---------------------------------------------- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 221 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 src/task-omatic/utils.rb diff --git a/src/task-omatic/utils.rb b/src/task-omatic/utils.rb deleted file mode 100644 index

Hello all, i''m using wxruby 1.9.4 with Grid and the model class: "GridTableBase" like in the code below. But the method set_table of the grid does''nt work. Can anyone help me? require ''wx'' include Wx class MyGridTableBase < GridTableBase def get_attr row, col, attr_kind ## end def get_number_rows 0

From: Ian Main <imain at management.mains.priv> This patch makes finding of volumes within attached pools more rubust by looking for the filename if it fails to find it by key. This fixes the volume finding for cobbler iso images mounted on nfs. Signed-off-by: Ian Main <imain at redhat.com> --- src/task-omatic/taskomatic.rb | 8 +++++++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1

Hello, I have a Promise EX 12-port RAID controller in my box, connected to 8 750GB disks. I have set up 2 RAID-5 devices and joined these using LVM. This is working fine. However, there is something that seems wrong.. (4-1) * 750 = 2250, but df reports the LVM volume as a mere 4.0T; /dev/mapper/storage_volume-stor 4.0T 3.6T 507G 88% /storage Shouldn't this be 4.5TB? Relevant bit of

Does anybody knows if is there a certified procedure in to backup a RAC DB 10.2.0.3 based on OCFS2 , via split mirror or snaphots technology ? Using Linux LVM and OCFS2, does anybody knows if is possible to dinamically extend an OCFS filesystem, once the underlying LVM Volume has been extended ? Thanks in advance Riccardo Paganini

On Thursday 21 April 2005 18:28, Vyacheslav Akhmechet wrote: > Evan, > > The problem is that I do not know the type of a target function at > compile time. If you consider my code example, I don't know the type > of 'i' until runtime (in fact, I can't even know a possible range of > types 'i' may assume). But... in a dynamic language each variable must

--- src/app/views/storage/_form.rhtml | 2 ++ src/app/views/storage/_list.rhtml | 4 ++++ src/app/views/storage/_list_volumes.rhtml | 4 ++++ src/app/views/storage/show.rhtml | 4 ++++ .../views/storage_volume/_new_volume_form.rhtml | 1 + src/app/views/storage_volume/show.rhtml | 8 ++++++++ 6 files

--- src/app/views/storage/_form.rhtml | 2 ++ src/app/views/storage/_list.rhtml | 4 ++++ src/app/views/storage/_list_volumes.rhtml | 4 ++++ src/app/views/storage/show.rhtml | 4 ++++ .../views/storage_volume/_new_volume_form.rhtml | 1 + src/app/views/storage_volume/show.rhtml | 8 ++++++++ 6 files

Hello, yesterday I experienced following problem with my ext3 filesystem: - I had ext3 filesystem of the size of a few TB with journal. I correctly unmounted it and it was marked clean. - I then ran fsck.etx3 -f on it and it did not find any problem. - After increasing size of its LVM volume by 1.5 TB I resized the filesystem by resize2fs lvm_volume and it finished without problem. - But

Evan, The problem is that I do not know the type of a target function at compile time. If you consider my code example, I don't know the type of 'i' until runtime (in fact, I can't even know a possible range of types 'i' may assume). Thanks, - Slava. On 4/21/05, Evan Jones <ejones at uwaterloo.ca> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-21-04 at 09:31 -0400, Vyacheslav Akhmechet

I have a problem. In my application I have a few Grid objects in a Notebook. The Grid objects are populated via GridTableBase. Certain Grid cells need to have a choice interface (I''m artificially enforcing foreign key constraints). All this works to the point where you try to edit the value for that cell. The choice box renders (i.e. the drop down arrow appears) then the application

Hi, it seems you got it right! I don't know if you read email I sent you before posting to the mailing list, but I accidentally diagnosed the cause... :) I've noticed that inodes fsck warned me about, at least ones that I checked, all have all four timestamps latest in 2010... The filesystem has maximum 1281998848 inodes, which is timestamp in august 2010. I don't know how it got

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 06:56:57PM +0200, Patrik Horn?k wrote: > > yesterday I experienced following problem with my ext3 filesystem: > > - I had ext3 filesystem of the size of a few TB with journal. I correctly > unmounted it and it was marked clean. > > - I then ran fsck.etx3 -f on it and it did not find any problem. > > - After increasing size of its LVM volume by