similar to: I'm all for it

On 11/1/06, Guillaume FORTAINE <guillaume.fortaine at wanadoo.fr> wrote: > >C--'s weakness is it's incompleteness (missing many major features), > >instability/bugginess, poor performance (both time to compile and the > >generated code), lack of high-level optimizations, lack of ABI > >compatibility with the native tools, lack of C++ frontend support, and the

>C--'s weakness is it's incompleteness (missing many major features), >instability/bugginess, poor performance (both time to compile and the >generated code), lack of high-level optimizations, lack of ABI >compatibility with the native tools, lack of C++ frontend support, and the >small size of its community. To quote Tony Hoare : "premature optimization is the

Misters, Let me introduce myself : Guillaume FORTAINE, Engineer in Computer Science. Me and my partners are currently working on a Virtualization Firmware. After an analysis of the various solutions (Citrix, VMware and Microsoft), it seemed natural to our eyes, to enable a true bare-metal hypervisor, to go as close as possible to the hardware, hence the BIOS. That's why we are currently

>Neither C-- nor LLVM provide this.  Why do you need a GLR parser >specifically? http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~smcpeak/elkhound/ Parsing with arbitrary context-free grammars has two key advantages: (1) unbounded lookahead, and (2) support for ambiguous grammars. Unbounded lookahead is achieved by allowing multiple potential parses to coexist for as long as necessary. Similarly, ambiguity

Hello, I'm a French student in computing science and I'm interested in your llvm project. We plan to build a new OS design using the Mozart-Oz language ( http://hurd.gnufans.org/bin/view/Hurd/NextHurd ). Could we "easily" implement a Mozart front-end to llvm ? Do you think llvm could be a good alternative to gcc for our project ? http://www.mozart-oz.org

Hello, The Mozart-Oz isn't suitable for our project beacause of disappointing "raw" performances : http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=al http://www.gecode.org/benchmarks.html I have found a very interesting language : http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/alice/ Concurrency, logic verification I found this link : http://www.cminusminus.org with a

My aim is to install a standalone node on the following hardware & run the management server in one of it's VMs. Dell Poweredge 2950 PERC 6/i RAID0 6x: 25G / 1T / 4.4T Dual Xeon 5470 quad-core 3.3GHz / 20G RAM Dual onboard Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 NICs I downloaded the [1]oVirt Node 1.0.2-1.fc11.x86_64 iso from the [2]website & boot in standalone mode per [3]instructions on the

On 05/10/2019 15:20, lejeczek via samba wrote: > > On 05/10/2019 14:10, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 05/10/2019 13:41, lejeczek via samba wrote: >>> hi everyone, >>> >>> I believe a resolution is there - >>> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4367771 >> Which is behind a paywall ;-) >>> But what I'm hoping for is an expert

On 05/10/2019 14:10, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 05/10/2019 13:41, lejeczek via samba wrote: >> hi everyone, >> >> I believe a resolution is there - >> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4367771 > Which is behind a paywall ;-) >> >> But what I'm hoping for is an expert would comment how >> would this apply >> to Samba with LDAP

 Hello,  I am French Engineer in Informatics and I would want to build a start  up to  manufacture mobile phones ( OEM level ). I am currently in discussion with investors. We would want to use LLVM as our main compiler but we will need to complete it to have a "commercial grade" one. Here are our goals : -Use a modified Elkhound as C/C++ front-end :

On Nov 19, 2015, at 3:49 PM, Devin Reade <gdr at gno.org> wrote: > > size of the disk was never the original motivation for > keeping / separate, at least within my memory Prior to SysV, the location of user home directories was not standardized, and AT&T recommended that you put them in /usr.[1] Also, in the PDP days, you had things like the RL and RK series drives, which

Hello, I would want to know what are the main differences between LLVM and C--. We need a robust compiler ( or at least the most promising to work on it ) with these features : -A GLR parser (use a modified Elkhound as C/C++ front-end):   http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~smcpeak/elkhound/ -Complete the ARM back-end -To be able to compile a complete Cross Linux from scratch for arm with uclibc-nptl.

Hi Chad, On Aug 6, 2013, at 7:46 AM, Chad Rosier <chad.rosier at gmail.com> wrote: > All, > I have some code that looks like the following: > > { > double a, b, c; > for (...) { > ... > a = lots of FP math; > b = lots of FP math; > c = lots of FP math; > if (cond) { > a = 0.0; > b = 0.1; > c = 0.2; >

Hi all, I am trying to merge several data sets and end up with a long data format by date & time so I can run correlations and plots. I am using Deducer as an R GUI but can just use the R console if easier. The data sets are weather with wind speed, relative humidity and temperatures by date and minute and bat activity with date, time, label, and an activity index number. The bat

On Tue, March 31, 2015 16:18, Frank Cox wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:11:38 -0400 > James B. Byrne wrote: > >> Does anyone have any idea what has happened and why I might be >> getting that message? > > I don't use that but have you checked to see if you now have a > "rpmsave" file left after installing the update? If so, that's your > old

Thanks, Mark. I will give the paper a look. On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Chad, > > On Aug 6, 2013, at 7:46 AM, Chad Rosier <chad.rosier at gmail.com> wrote: > > > All, > > I have some code that looks like the following: > > > > { > > double a, b, c; > > for (...) { > >

Misters, Happy New Year to you. Let me introduce myself : Guillaume FORTAINE, Engineer in Computer Science. I am currently working on a Cloud Computing Firmware in an Infrastructure-as-a-Service context. The product is an UEFI Hypervisor. It puts virtualization exactly where it belongs: Into the firmware [0] Customers will be able to deploy their appliances and products directly to new

Misters, Happy New Year to you. Let me introduce myself : Guillaume FORTAINE, Engineer in Computer Science. I am currently working on a Cloud Computing Firmware in an Infrastructure-as-a-Service context. The product is an UEFI Hypervisor. It puts virtualization exactly where it belongs: Into the firmware [0] Customers will be able to deploy their appliances and products directly to new

I seem to have run into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855640, because when I tried the fix/work-around at the end (comment 11), ethtool -K eth0 gro off, my download speed by speedtest went from undetectable to ~150Mb/s. However, it was not able to connect for the upload test, and so something may still be off. Non-virtual machines can do the upload test, so it's not just a

Dear Dennis, > Why should I care? Don't get me wrong the idea sound interesting but I > don't really see why it is so vitally important to put the HV right > into the BIOS. The problem is that you loose support for a lot of > hardware that cannot be booted with coreboot. Our engineering solution comes from a real world problem : faulty firmware (BIOS or UEFI)