similar to: [PATCH: server 0/3] Add host-register.rb (replaces host-browser.rb in part)

The purpose of this patch is to replace the identify function in host-browser.rb with a new script, host-register.rb. host-register.rb is a qmf ruby console that interfaces with the newly added matahari qmf agent on the ovirt node. While it stores node data in the database with the same behavior as the original host-browser implementation, it acquires the data using the amqp protocol (and

VLAN are supported with this patch from Patrick Guiran <pguiran at linagora.com> Setup instructions coming soon (https://fedorahosted.org/ovirt/wiki/VLANSetup) Signed-off-by: Arthur Clement <aclement at linagora.com> --- src/lib/managed_node_configuration.rb | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

This patch fixes state changes in dbomatic so that there is no intermediate 'stopped' state after being unreachable or on startup of dbomatic etc. Also fixes a number of smaller bugs around host associations, state changes, etc. Signed-off-by: Ian Main <imain at redhat.com> --- src/db-omatic/db_omatic.rb | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 files changed, 60

The error is caused by the save! method updating an object that another thread (most likely in taskomatic) already updated. In the case of this race condition, we retry saving. However, a proper fix would involve fixing the locking. --- src/db-omatic/db_omatic.rb | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/db-omatic/db_omatic.rb

Autobuild has to be updated to call make in the recipe directory and move the resulting iso to the main build directory. Importing the existing autotest.sh script from ovirt-node-image Signed-off-by: Mike Burns <mburns at redhat.com> --- autobuild.sh | 7 + autotest.sh | 764 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 771 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

All temporary files are kept in a single directory. At the end of the autotests that one directory is deleted. Signed-off-by: Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> --- autotest.sh | 20 +++++++++++--------- 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/autotest.sh b/autotest.sh index c9f8a2d..d658cf3 100755 --- a/autotest.sh +++ b/autotest.sh @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ # an

The series introduces auto-generation of the type definitions used in the libxl interface followed by auto-generation of a destructor function for each type. In the future it may be possible to use the related data structures for other purposes, for example auto-generation of the functions to marshal between C and language binding data types. tools/_libxl_types.h should be identical both before

Signed-off-by: Arthur Clement <aclement at linagora.com> --- src/host-browser/host-register.rb | 16 ++++++++++++---- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/host-browser/host-register.rb b/src/host-browser/host-register.rb index 693a6f2..5ff6a90 100755 --- a/src/host-browser/host-register.rb +++ b/src/host-browser/host-register.rb @@ -393,13 +393,18 @@ class

This patch updates dbomatic, taskomatic and host-register to use the new C++ wrapped ruby QMF bindings. It also fixes a couple of bugs along the way including the 0 cpu bug for host-register. This is a compilation of work done by myself and Arjun Roy. Signed-off-by: Ian Main <imain at redhat.com> --- src/db-omatic/db_omatic.rb | 111 ++++++-------

I''m trying to spec out a render partial collection but I get the following error 2) NoMethodError in ''/games/_game.rhtml should show game name'' undefined method `body'' for #<#<Class:0x316580c>:0x2f1154c> /Volumes/EXTERNAL/web/omenking.ca/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/rails/matchers/have_text.rb:12:in `matches?''

Does anyone have some tips for setting up Broadcom's 802.3AD support or just getting their driver compiled / installed? First off, I noticed redhat claims the broadcom bcm5708 driver has been added to the rhel4 kernel. But I don't see /proc/net/nicinfo which broadcom claims the driver creates when it's successfully initialized. So, I'm trying to build the driver based on the

I was looking over some of my specs. I was thinking that the following: @game.should_receive(:name).and_return(''The Battle for Blaze'') @game.should_receive(:people).and_return(5000000) @game.should_receive(:activated).and_return(true) Would it look cleaner if I could do this instead? @game.should_recieve_and_return( :name => ''The Battle for Blaze''

There is one annoyance I''m encountering with the Mock API in rSpec. Overall it works well, as far as dynamic mocks go ;)... but there''s this one thing... It doesn''t allow overriding of expectations. example: m = mock("blah") m.should_receive(:one).any_number_of_times().and_return(1) m.should_receive(:one).and_return(1) The second call to should_receive

What do you guys think of this: if someone calls should_receive outside of an "it" block, it warns you. before(:each) do @foo = Foo.new @foo.should_receive(:monkeys) end would warn you that you''re setting an expectation in the wrong place, and that "stub" is correct when setting up objects. Opinions? courtenay

Hi, It appears that if I have 2 should_receives in a row, the latest one overrides the previous one(s). If there isn''t one, could we add a way to accumulate them, such as @thing.should_receive(:method).and_return(@value) @thing.should_receive(:method).again.and_return(@value) @thing.should_receive(:method).again.and_return(@value) would be equivalent to

I''ve just found myself stuck trying to rspec something so am hoping someone more knowledgable can help. I have a Connector class which has a class method ''results'' that yields results it get from a network service based on a set of attributes that I pass to it. I am wanting to yield these results from my Intermediate class up to the next

I''ve found myself mocking out a published api in my set-up method. This has led to some contexts having a large set-up and empty specifications. As the mocks get auto-verified, the specification blocks have nothing to do but serve as documentation. Does this sound bad? Chris

Hello forum I have there to files #----- virtual_host_controller.rb class VirtualHostsController < ApplicationController before_filter :capture_domain # GET /domain/1/virtual_hosts/1 def show @virtual_host = @domain.virtual_hosts.find(params[:id]) respond_to do |format| format.html # show.rhtml end end private def capture_domain if

One thing that is bothering me about my controller specs is that sometimes I end up with a number of examples that are the same except for the example name. The reason that this happens is that I''ve expressed all the expected behavior with should_receive. While this does more or less work as intended it doesn''t feel right. As an example, let''s say I''m writing

Hey, I just ran into a situation where I would like to expect a method call with an argument I know and another one, which is a random number. I think mocking up the rand method is somehow ugly so I thought maybe this is the first time where I can take something from Java to Ruby ;) Java''s EasyMock mocking library knows things like "anyObject()" and "anyInteger()" in