Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "[PATCH server] make postgres wait for starting to complete before creating databases"
2009 Aug 21
1
[PATCH server] update installer exec items to single_exec where applicable
Signed-off-by: Joey Boggs <jboggs at redhat.com>
---
installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/freeipa.pp | 8 ++++----
installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/postgres.pp | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/freeipa.pp b/installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/freeipa.pp
index e5de852..f91cd43 100644
---
2009 Jun 23
1
[PATCH server] added ovirt-wait4service and invokation in installer to wait for psql/ldap
FIXME this patch isn't complete, still need to figure out the ldap command to
wait for that service, something along the lines of:
ldapsearch -b dc=priv,dc=ovirt,dc=org -x
(but how will we parse the base from the installer? also this cmd
fails, how to fix?)
---
installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/ovirt.pp | 8 +++++-
installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/postgres.pp | 13 ++++++---
2009 Jun 23
1
[PATCH server] add postgres permissions requires prior to starting service
Give this one a try which will require the user/hosts permissions to be setup prior to starting postgres
---
installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/postgres.pp | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/postgres.pp b/installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/postgres.pp
index c46b360..381d67c 100644
---
2009 Jul 06
1
[PATCH server] add ipv6 postgres trust
If management server has ipv6 enabled and postgres is not configured to allow localhost access via ::1 the postgres service will fail.
---
installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/postgres.pp | 8 +++++++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/postgres.pp b/installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/postgres.pp
index 36bcdc0..12b7764 100644
---
2009 Jun 05
0
[PATCH server] update postgres for ipv6 support, or db:migrate will fail
If the ::1 ipv6 loopback entry is missing in pg_hba.conf rake db:migrate will fail
rake aborted!
FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for host "::1", user "ovirt", database "ovirt_development", SSL off
---
installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/postgres.pp | 8 +++++++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
2009 May 15
1
[PATCH server] add server-side groundwork for remote freeipa server
This lays 90% of the groundwork needed on the server side to support the use of a remote ipa server.
Leaving the option disabled in the installer until the necessary node integration(dns/keytab placementi location) is completed
Also apply:
[PATCH server] update ovirt-add-host to use ipa commands instead of kadmin.local
[PATCH server] separate ipa common tasks freeipa::common and rename
2016 Feb 17
2
New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547
On 17/02/16 14:44, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 02/17/2016 08:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 02/17/2016 08:10 AM, Michael H wrote:
>>>> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted,
>>>> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest.
>>>>
>>>> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as
2016 Feb 17
0
Kernel parameters ignored -
Hi, re-posting this with a more appropriate subject for my reply;
> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted,
> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest.
>
> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as
> Important .. so you should boot to that anyway:
>
2016 Feb 17
1
New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547
> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted,
> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest.
>
> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as
> Important .. so you should boot to that anyway:
> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2016-February/021705.html
>
> Here is a good link to figure out what to
2016 Feb 17
0
New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547
On 02/17/2016 08:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 02/17/2016 08:10 AM, Michael H wrote:
>>> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted,
>>> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest.
>>>
>>> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as
>>> Important .. so you should boot to that anyway:
2016 Feb 17
2
Kernel parameters ignored -
On 17/02/16 14:32, Michael H wrote:
> Hi, re-posting this with a more appropriate subject for my reply;
>
>> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted,
>> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest.
>>
>> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as
>> Important .. so you should boot to that anyway:
2016 Feb 17
2
New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547
On 02/17/2016 08:10 AM, Michael H wrote:
>> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted,
>> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest.
>>
>> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as
>> Important .. so you should boot to that anyway:
>>
2009 Jun 15
1
[PATCH][ovirt-server] restart ipa after installation and before set admin password
From: ??????? <pronix.service at gmail.com>
if krb5kdc has worked before installation appear error. and require 'ipactl restart'
---
installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/freeipa.pp | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/freeipa.pp b/installer/modules/ovirt/manifests/freeipa.pp
index aa806fe..5a9fb44 100644
---
2015 Aug 17
0
persistent change of max_stack_depth
Just a quick addition -
On 17/08/15 08:40, Michael H wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 14/08/15 16:45, Jason Warr wrote:
>> On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 16:31 +0100, Michael H wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>>
>>>> Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel
>>>> parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning?
2015 Aug 14
0
persistent change of max_stack_depth
On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 16:31 +0100, Michael H wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>
> > Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel
> > parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning?
> >
> > I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does not
> > survive a reboot.
> >
> >
>
> Thanks for
2015 Aug 17
2
persistent change of max_stack_depth
Hi Jason,
On 14/08/15 16:45, Jason Warr wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 16:31 +0100, Michael H wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>>
>>> Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel
>>> parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning?
>>>
>>> I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does not
2015 Aug 14
2
persistent change of max_stack_depth
On Aug 14, 2015 08:45, Jason Warr <jason at warr.net> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 16:31 +0100, Michael H wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> >
> > > Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel
> > > parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning?
> > >
> > > I have currently set it by running
2010 Aug 04
1
Build fails due to missing ovirt-node-recipe.ks
> - ace -d install ovirt has one error : package ovirt-node-image-pxe
> not
> found
I get an error when FreeIPA is set up. Then a whole heap of notices and warning about a missing dependancy (presumably FreeIPA)
debug: //freeipa::bundled/Single_exec[ipa_server_install]: Executing '/usr/sbin/ipa-server-install -r ovirt.priv -p 'supersecretpw' -P 'supersecretpw' -a
2015 Aug 17
2
persistent change of max_stack_depth
Hi All,
>>>>> Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel
>>>>> parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does not
>>>>> survive a reboot.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
2015 Aug 14
4
persistent change of max_stack_depth
Hi Thomas,
> Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel
> parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning?
>
> I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does not
> survive a reboot.
>
>
Thanks for the response, I've been nosing around that file recently but
noted the first two lines;
#This file sets the