Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "documentation of "scope": possible error + cleanup (PR#5095)"
2004 Nov 12
1
plot.rpart ignores uniform=TRUE if graphics device is not open (PR#7361)
Full_Name: Hsiu-Khuern Tang
Version: 2.0.0
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Submission from: (NULL) (156.153.255.236)
Hi all,
If fit is an rpart object,
plot(fit, uniform=TRUE)
ignores uniform=TRUE if the graphics device is not already open.
To reproduce this:
library("rpart")
example(plot.rpart)
dev.off() # <- works OK without this
plot(fit, uniform=TRUE) # <- uniform=TRUE is ignored
2001 Aug 07
1
cannot assign to NULL dimnames (PR#1042)
Full_Name: Hsiu-Khuern Tang
Version: 1.3.0
OS: GNU/Linux (Debian unstable)
Submission from: (NULL) (192.6.19.124)
Hi all,
I am not sure this is a bug rather than an intentional design, but here
goes:
If I do
> a <- matrix(1:4, nrow=2)
> dimnames(a)[[1]] <- c("a", "b")
I get the following error message because dimnames(a) is NULL:
Error: more elements
2003 Oct 29
1
Wishlist: user-specified color names for palette() (PR#4836)
Full_Name: Hsiu-Khuern Tang
Version: 1.8.0
OS: GNU/Linux (Debian unstable)
Submission from: (NULL) (156.153.255.243)
Hi,
I use palette(rgb(red=..., green=..., blue=..., names=mycolors)) to define my
own color palette. After doing this, the names `mycolors' are not stored in
palette() anymore, so that palette() returns a mix of built-in color names and
RGB values.
Eg:
> palette()
2006 Apr 18
2
typos in src/main/gram.y (PR#8780)
In src/main/gram.y, the documentation for R_ParseVector has a wrong
signature:
SEXP R_ParseVector(TextBuffer *text, int n, ParseStatus *status)
should be
SEXP R_ParseVector(SEXP text, int n, ParseStatus *status)
In addition, the two occurrences of "IOBuffer" in the documentation
should be replaced by "IoBuffer".
version.string = Version 2.3.0 beta (2006-04-14 r37779)
2015 Mar 11
1
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang <tangoh at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang <tangoh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
2015 Mar 10
0
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On 10/03/2015 2:56 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
>> To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org>
>> Cc: "Hsiu-Khuern Tang" <tangoh at gmail.com>, r-devel at r-project.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:37:12 AM
>>
2015 Mar 10
1
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Duncan Murdoch
<murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/03/2015 11:02 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
>> Hi Duncan,
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Duncan Murdoch
>> <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 09/03/2015 11:07 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at
2015 Mar 11
0
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
> To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org>
> Cc: r-devel at r-project.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 12:06:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
>
> On 10/03/2015 3:17 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
2015 Mar 11
0
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang <tangoh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I successfully rebuilt R-devel_2015-03-09 with the most recent version
>>> of Rtools
2015 Mar 10
0
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On 09/03/2015 11:02 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
> Hi Duncan,
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Duncan Murdoch
> <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 09/03/2015 11:07 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 08/03/2015 10:02 PM,
2015 Mar 10
0
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On 10/03/2015 12:54 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
> > To: "Hsiu-Khuern Tang" <tangoh at gmail.com>, r-devel at r-project.org
> > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 10:40:02 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Rd] Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not
2015 Mar 11
2
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang <tangoh at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Avraham Adler <avraham.adler at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I successfully rebuilt R-devel_2015-03-09 with the most recent version
>> of Rtools tonight, building both ICU_531 and this time libcurl (7.39)
>> as well (and OpenBLAS, of course). The
2015 Mar 10
2
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
> To: "Hsiu-Khuern Tang" <tangoh at gmail.com>, r-devel at r-project.org
> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 10:40:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
>
> On 09/03/2015 11:07 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
> > On
2015 Mar 10
3
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
> To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org>
> Cc: "Hsiu-Khuern Tang" <tangoh at gmail.com>, r-devel at r-project.org
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:37:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
2015 Mar 11
2
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On 10/03/2015 3:17 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 10/03/2015 2:56 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
> >> To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org>
> >> Cc: "Hsiu-Khuern Tang" <tangoh at gmail.com>, r-devel at
2015 Mar 11
2
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On 11/03/2015 3:09 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>
> > To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org>
> > Cc: r-devel at r-project.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 12:06:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Rd] Notes on building a gcc toolchain for
2015 Mar 09
0
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang <tangoh at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [This is a follow-up to the "New version of Rtools for Windows" thread
> in January, but I just subscribed and don't know how to reply to an
> old thread -- my apologies.]
>
> I was able to use the nuwen distro to build a gcc 4.9.2 toolchain and
> use it to build the
2002 Mar 19
0
levels(f)<-list doesn't work as expected when list is longer than nlevels(f) (PR#1394)
Full_Name: Hsiu-Khuern Tang
Version: 1.4.1
OS: Linux
Submission from: (NULL) (192.6.19.190)
Hi all,
When renaming the levels of a factor f using levels(f)<-list(...), if the
list is longer than the original number of levels in f, the result is wrong.
Example:
> f <- factor(c("a","b"))
> levels(f) <- list(C="C", A="a", B="b")
2015 Mar 09
0
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On 09/03/2015 11:07 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 08/03/2015 10:02 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> [This is a follow-up to the "New version of Rtools for Windows" thread
> >> in January, but I just subscribed and don't know how
2015 Mar 09
5
Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib)
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/03/2015 10:02 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> [This is a follow-up to the "New version of Rtools for Windows" thread
>> in January, but I just subscribed and don't know how to reply to an
>> old thread -- my apologies.]
>
> I am planning to