similar to: about textConnection

Hi, I know that if i want to see the SPLUS or R-source code of a function,i should give the command without the brackets.For example:  rsquared.lmRobMM function(x) {  str0 <- "Initial S-estimate"  str1 <- "Final M-estimate"  if(x$est == "final") {   z <- x$r.squared   attr(z, "info") <- str1  }  if(x$est == "initial") {   z <-

I used this service several months ago and was very pleased with the response. I have a dataframe with several thousand lines and to each line I need to apply a series of "if else" statements. For each row I need either a value or a blank/NA. Below is the series of if else statements I have been trying without success to integrate into a function such as "apply". if

Hi Piotr, I think I found a working matcher: match ifStmt(hasCondition(implicitCastExpr(hasImplicitDestinationType(isInteger()), has(cxxMemberCallExpr(callee(cxxMethodDecl(hasName("compare"))), hasArgument(0, declRefExpr().bind("str2")), callee(memberExpr(has(declRefExpr().bind("str1"))))))))).bind("case1") This one bind to both str1 and str2 in

Hi Piotr, Thanks. Yeah, it seemed a little weird, but it was what got me closest. I found out that the matcher I supplied here was working for clang-query 3.8.1. I'm working on a clang-tidy module for 4.0.0 - it's not working there. Could you elaborate on the "onImplicitObjectArgument"? There is no document on it on the clang page. So I wouldn't know how it works or what it

Hi, I am trying to use alias analysis (Anderson) and noticed that for pointers to functions I don't get the expected result: a pointer that clearly may point to a function is reported as NoAlias. I use -anders-aa -aa-eval -print-no-aliases -print-may-aliases -print-must-aliases Here is a test case: ///////////////try_calls_aliases.c #include <stdio.h> typedef int (*PF)(); PF

Hey again) Now I have next code: ; ModuleID = 'sample.lz' @.str1 = internal global [8 x i8] c" world!\00" ; <[8 x i8]*> [#uses=1] @.str2 = internal global [8 x i8] c"hello, \00" ; <[8 x i8]*> [#uses=1] @.str7 = internal global [21 x i8] c"welcome to out hall!\00" ; <[21 x i8]*> [#uses=1] declare i32 @puts(i8*)

Adding cfe-dev, because it is related to clang, not LLVM. 2016-11-27 22:34 GMT+01:00 Piotr Padlewski <piotr.padlewski at gmail.com>: > Hi Mads, > Can you provide the code that you run clang-query on, or at least AST for > the fragment you want to match? > > Piotr > > 2016-11-26 22:27 GMT+01:00 Mads Ravn via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > >: >

Any idea why CHAR(asChar(STRING_ELT( produces NA whereas CHAR(STRING_ELT( gets a pointer to a string? It's generally expected that STRING_ELT should already be a character, but why the coercion does not work? Here is a simple example (consistent over R2.5.1-R2.6 rev 42284, I didn't check earlier versions, but it used to be different in 2.4): install.packages("inline")

but why this code don't work: ; ModuleID = 'sample.lz' @.str1 = internal global [6 x i8] c"world\00" ; <[6 x i8]*> [#uses=1] @.str2 = internal global [7 x i8] c"hello \00" ; <[7 x i8]*> [#uses=1] @.str7 = internal global [7 x i8] c"father\00" ; <[7 x i8]*> [#uses=1] @.str8 = internal global [8 x i8]

I have some elements in a vector with extraneous information (e.g. file name and sample IDs) that I'd like to strip from every element. For example, I would like "SPI1.S1.str1.P3.sample.tif" "SPI1.S1.STR2.P1.sample.tif" to read "SPI1.S1.str1.P3" "SPI1.S1.STR2.P1". Will someone help me with the syntax in gsub? It needs to be something like

Hi, I have a vector, which contains both strings and numbers, e.g. > foo <- c("str1",1234,"str2",0.9876) I want to know if a distinct element of the vector is a string or a number and took "is.numeric", but > is.numeric(foo[2]) [1] FALSE because R treats the numbers in a mixed vectors as strings: > foo [1] "str1" "1234"

Hi, Hope this is the right channel for this question. I am trying to make an ast matcher for clang-tidy to find str1.compare(str2), where both str1 and str2 are std::string. I have this so far: http://i.imgur.com/sUma9WC.png . But I am having a hard time finding a way to bind an id to the str1 part of the expression. Can anyone help me out with an idea? Best regards, Mads Ravn --------------

Dear all, [system and version information below] I am trying to modify a C function for finding the root of an expression. The function is to be called from R as .Call with input parameters: f: expression for which we will find the root guesses: interval for the solution stol: tolerance rho: environment The original functions I use are: SEXP mkans(double x) { SEXP ans; PROTECT(ans =

Dear all, [system and version information below] I am trying to modify a C function for finding the root of an expression. The function is to be called from R as .Call with input parameters: f: expression for which we will find the root guesses: interval for the solution stol: tolerance rho: environment The original functions I use are: SEXP mkans(double x) { SEXP ans; PROTECT(ans =

I am trying to understand the hello word assember example. This is my version: %str1 = internal constant [13 x sbyte] c"Hello World\0a\00" declare int %printf(sbyte*, ...) implementation ; Functions: int %main() { %str2 = getelementptr [13 x sbyte]* %str1, long 0, long 0 call int(sbyte*, ...) *%printf(sbyte* %str2) ret int 0 } Why is getelementptr being given two "long

Hi all, I would like to strip the R prompt from a series of code lines and copy the resulting text into a R script. For example, consider the following : ##### str1<-" > library(MASS) > data(Cars93) > attach(Cars93) > imosaic(data.frame(AirBags,Cylinders,Origin))" str2<-gsub('>','',str1) ###### This gives, as expected .? > str2 [1] "\n

Dear developers: When I am doing basicblock pass, I meet a bug: there is an iterator "I" in a basicblock, and it is not pointing to the first instruction in this basicblock. However, "I--;" will fail by an assertion. The basic block ("I" is pointing to the second instruction) in test.ll: bb: ; preds = %bb1 %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias

On 27 Sep., 05:45, hc2... at columbia.edu wrote: > Dear developers: >      When I am doing basicblock pass, I meet a bug: there is an   > iterator "I" in a basicblock, and it is not pointing to the first   > instruction in this basicblock. However, "I--;" will fail by an   > assertion. Hi hc! are you on SVN trunk? Cheers, Gabor > > The basic block

Hi, I must say I also was in need of this document but never knew it existed. It seems to be linked from the faq page only. I only read that the first day I came to LLVM. Maybe linking it from the GetElementPtr instruction in LangRef.html would make sense. cheers Eric On Nov 12, 2006, at 8:47 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > Ram, > > Please read and understand the GetElementPtr FAQ

It's invalid for the same reason that char *foobar = strcat("foo", "bar"); is invalid in C. Please make sure you understand what you're asking LLVM to do before going any further down this path. A good approach is to write out the correct code in C and then use llvm-gcc (or the demo page at http://llvm.org/demo ) to see what it looks like in LLVM assembly. Nick