similar to: matrix multiplication speed R

Hi, I get an error using RcppGSL: fatal error: gsl/gsl_vector.h:No such file or directory. What is the best way to install these files as they seem to be missing? Thanks, Oyvind -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Error-using-RcppGSL-tp3613535p3613535.html Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dear all, I get an error using betrag on this data set :http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1866110/dump.csv. I run it like this regression f2.1=betareg(Y~X1+X2,data=dump) summary(f2.1) I get : Call: betareg(formula = Y ~ X1 + X2, data = dump) Standardized weighted residuals 2: Error in quantile.default(x$residuals) : missing values and NaN's not allowed if 'na.rm' is FALSE In addition:

Anyone know how to esimate parameters in the system: x[k]=Ax[k-1]+ B + Gv[k-1] y[k]=x[k]+Du[k]+Hw[k] a system with exogenous u[k] in the measurement eq., v,w are iid, both eq. are gaussian. Thanks, Oyvind --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > On 30/06/11 15:13, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >>> Sorry, I meant from which version of clang? I'm using Ubuntu 10 and >>> I was wondering if clang/llvm 2.8 would do it. >> >> Perhaps I better try the latest, got an error when I tried 2.8: > > C++ support in clang 2.8 was poor.

I am reading some documentation about Cross Spectrum Analysis as a technique to compare spectra. My understanding is that it estimates the correlation strength between quasi-periodic structures embedded in two signals. I believe it may be useful for my signals analysis. I was referred to the R functions that implement this type of analysis. I tried all the examples which generated a series of

I have been trying to figure out how glusterfs-fuse client will handle it when 1 of 3 bricks in a 3-way replica is slower than the others. It looks like a glusterfs-fuse client will send requests to all 3 bricks when accessing a file. But what happens when one of the bricks is not responding in time? We saw an issue when we added external load to the raid volume where the brick was located. The

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Reid Kleckner <reid.kleckner at gmail.com> wrote: > An easier way would be to use a coverage tool like gcov to see what's > actually *used* when the app is run normally.  Then you can ask the > question, what percentage of all lines of code are dead? We need something that can do this using static analysis... Otherwise we can just use Eclipse

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe at zylin.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Reid Kleckner <reid.kleckner at gmail.com> wrote: >> An easier way would be to use a coverage tool like gcov to see what's >> actually *used* when the app is run normally.  Then you can ask the >> question, what percentage of all lines of code

Hi all, After searching for a decent compiler backend for ages (google sometimes isn't helpful), I recently stumbled upon LLVM. Woot!! I work on bignum arithmetic (I'm a professional mathematician) and have recently decided to switch from developing GPL'd bignum code to BSD licensed code. (See http://www.mpir.org/ which I contributed to for a while - a fork of GMP). Please bear with

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Øyvind, > >> I'm trying to find some written evidence to present to the powers >> that be that clang/llvm is ABI compatible with GCC 4.1 linux >> 64 bit. > > both clang and gcc-4.1 are supposed to conform to the platform ABI (if they > don't then that is a bug), and thus

Hi Øyvind, > I'm trying to find some written evidence to present to the powers > that be that clang/llvm is ABI compatible with GCC 4.1 linux > 64 bit. both clang and gcc-4.1 are supposed to conform to the platform ABI (if they don't then that is a bug), and thus be ABI compatible. Ciao, Duncan.

Can llvm generate warnings for unused C++ code using global analysis? If I could use llvm to figure out what code I can delete in a 20 year old app with millions of lines of code, this alone would defend spending time on making the app build with llvm, even if we don't actually run the code generated... -- Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project? US toll free

I was able to get the loop to increment from -999 to 0 using IR directly. That got rid of the cmpq. The carry i was after was able to be obtained using the intrinsic @llvm.uadd.with.overflow.i64, however there is no way to add with carry and have it realise that the resulting *carry out* cannot exceed 1. It actually writes the carry to a byte, and then uses logical operations on it, which slows

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Eli, > > On 11 June 2010 22:44, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote: >>> a) What plans are there to support addition, subtraction, >>> multiplication, division,

On 12 June 2010 00:51, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote: >> Hi Eli, >> >> On 11 June 2010 22:44, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Bill Hart <goodwillhart at googlemail.com> wrote:

hello I'm using Samba 3.0.21b-2 on RHEL4.1. All the machines are logging to a windows 2003 ADS domain server. The samba server is a ADS member of this windows 2k3 server and user's access log is recorded by using the audit module. I recently came into this trouble, when I connect to samba server from client, the smbd_audit suddenly got panic. Please advise me how to solve this

Hi Bill- I think, ideally, the backend would be able to match arbitrary-precision arithmetic to add-with-carry or subtract-with-borrow through i65/i33. That would remove the need for the overflow intrinsics entirely. Alistair On 13 Jun 2010, at 02:27, Bill Hart wrote: > I was able to get the loop to increment from -999 to 0 using IR > directly. That got rid of the cmpq. > > The

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe at zylin.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> On 30/06/11 15:13, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >>>> Sorry, I meant from which version of clang? I'm using Ubuntu 10 and >>>> I was wondering if clang/llvm 2.8 would do it. >>>

Hi, i was searching in the source code, but i didn't find any MAX_MPX or something like that. How can i change MAX_MPX_REQUESTS that smbd can handle?

I'm trying to build an app with clang against libraries that are using GCC 4.1 ABI. I'm getting an error "weakref declaration must have internal linkage" Now I'm stumped though, perhaps it is an incompatibility between clang trunk and gcc 4.1 include files? - I've built clang from trunk - fixed include paths to point to gcc 4.1 include paths When I modify clang to use