similar to: Competing with one's own work (Prof. John C Nash)

I believe there to be a bug in the cvm.test module of the nortest package authored by Juergen Gross. I do not know how to contact the author directly. I've been running some normality tests using the nortest package. For some of my datasets the Cramer-von Mises normality test generates an extremely high probability (e.g., 1.637e+31) and indicates normality when the other tests do

Hi, this is my first help request so please bear with me. I've been running some normality tests using the nortest package. For some of my datasets the Cramer-von Mises normality test generates an extremely high probability (e.g., 1.637e+31) and indicates normality when the other tests do not. Is there something I'm misunderstanding or potentially a bug in the code? Below are the

Hi all, I am using "spatstat" to investigate the spatial structure of some plant populations, and I want to detect these patters with IPP and a Thomas process based on pair-correlation function. I know the function "pcfinhom" is available to characterize the IPP, but I have no idea about how to use the pcf with Thomas process? Additionally, generating simulation envelopes

Hello list, Is there any function in some package can calculate two sample Cramer-von Mises test statistic? I searched around and only find one sample version cvm.test() in nortest package. thanks, WC _________________________________________________________________ Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!

No, this is not about Rcpp, but a comment in that overly long discussion raised a question that has been in my mind for a while. This is that one may have work that is used in R in the base functionality and there are improvements that should be incorporated. For me, this concerns the BFGS, Nelder-Mead and CG options of optim(), which are based on the 1990 edition (Pascal codes) of my 1979 book

Hi Jay Emerson, Our Intention is to primarily optimize "R" to utilize the Parallel Processing Capabilities of CELL BE Processor.(has any work been done in this area?) We have huge pages(of size 1MB 16MB ) available in the system and as you pointed out our data is also in the GB ranges.So the idea is if Vectors of this huge size are allocated from Huge Pages the performance will

Respected Sir I am a very new user of R. I want to ask a question about "the nortest package". In this package how we can write the code of ad.test, cvm.test, ks.test for other distributions like GEV, GPA etc. I request you to please guide to me. Kind Regards AMNA -- AMINA SHAHZADI Department of Statistics GC University Lahore, Pakistan. Email: amnakhan493@gmail.com

UseRs, actuar is a package for Actuarial Science. A rather preliminary version (0.1-3) of the package has been available on CRAN since February 2006. We now announce the immediate availability of version 0.9-2 sporting a large number of new features. Non actuaries behold! There can be some features of interest for you, especially those related to new probability distribution and to the

UseRs, actuar is a package for Actuarial Science. A rather preliminary version (0.1-3) of the package has been available on CRAN since February 2006. We now announce the immediate availability of version 0.9-2 sporting a large number of new features. Non actuaries behold! There can be some features of interest for you, especially those related to new probability distribution and to the

We are building a package, and want to create S4 methods for both head and mean for our own BigMatrix class. Following the recommendation in "Writing R Extensions" we use exportMethods instead of export in NAMESPACE (this is described as being "clearer"). This works for head, but not for mean. Obviously we importFrom(utils, head), but don't need to do this for mean,

Hi, I'm working with the ks.test() function and I have also implemented the test using Conover as the reference. My D value matches that produced by R. However to calculate the p value I am using the code described in Numerical Recipes in C++ (2nd Ed.) pg 631. The p value produced by the NRC code is generally larger than that produced by R by a factor of 10. Currently I am not in a position

Hi, Interpretation problem ! so what i did is by using the: >fit1 <- fitdist(vectNorm,"beta") Warning messages: 1: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 2: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 3: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 4: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 5: In dbeta(x, shape1, shape2, log) : NaNs produced 6: In

I was surprised to observe the following difference between 2.4.1 and 2.6.0 after a long overdue upgrade a few months ago of our departmental server. It wasn't a bug fix, but a subtle improvement. Here's the simplest example I could create. The size is excessive, on the order of the Netflix Competition data. The integer matrix is about 1.12 GB, and if coerced to numeric it is 2.24 GB.

Hi, I'm using the ks.test() on two vectors. I looked up the reference and also coded up a version of the two sample Smirnov test. My question is that how can I decide from the output of R that the two vectors x & y come from the same distribution? Am I correct in assuming that smaller D values indicate that they come from the same distribution? In addition how can I use the p value that

Hello - I am using glmnet to generate a model for multiple cohorts i. For each i, I run 5 separate models, each with a different x variable. I want to compare the fit statistic for each i and x combination. When I use auc, the output is in some cases is < .5 (.49). In addition, if I compare mean MSE (with upper and lower bounds) ... there is no difference across my various x variables, but

I am trying to use nash on centos 5.2 to demonstrate the problem I did: cd /sbin ln -sf /sbin/nash sleep export PATH=/sbin:$PATH sleep 5 and I get an error. Red Hat nash version 5.1.19.6 starting nash cannot open 5: no such file or directory Why doesnt that work? Thanks, Jerry

Is there an r package out there that solves for pure strategy* Nash equilibrium of a two-person game*? A search for Nash equilibrium in r provides a link to the *GNE* package which solves for the Generalized Nash equilibrium. But what I would like to solve is a pure strategy Nash equilibrium. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R experts: I searched cran (and r-help) for "nash equilibrium" and "game" but nothing stuck out. has someone written a numerical nash optimizer for two players? player a has choices x1,x2,x3,... and cares about (maximizes) pa(x1,x2,x3,...,y1,y2,y3) player b has choices y1,y2,y3,..., and cares about (maximizes) pb(x1,x2,x3,...,y1,y2,y3) I can tune it to my problem, but

Why don't you implement and uplad the package to CRAN? On 27 Jun 2017 17:45, "Chris Buddenhagen" <cbuddenhagen at gmail.com> wrote: Does anyone know of some code, and examples that implement game theory/Nash equilibrium hypothesis testing using existing packages like igraph/statnet or similar? Perhaps along the lines of this article: Zhang, Y., Aziz-Alaoui, M. A., Bertelle,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I did some configuration changes on a XenServer 5.6 (Which I believe is running CentOS 5.5 under the hood). After a reboot, the server failed to come back up. Connecting to the serial console, I see that it hangs right after setting hostname: Setting hostname somehostname: [ OK ] INFO: task nash:5282 blocked for more than 120 seconds. "echo