similar to: Clean up after "R CMD INSTALL" and/or "R CMD check"

G'day all, I am not sure whether I should file this as a bug report, but I thought that I should make the developers of R aware of the following feature: I have just installed R 2.0.0 and when I run "R CMD check" on the source of some packages, I noticed that the XXX-examples.ps file contains one page with two graphics overlaid. This seems to happen when the first graphic is

G'day all, I found the following snippet in the NEWS file for R 2.14.1: ? R CMD INSTALL will now do a test load for all sub-architectures for which code was compiled (rather than just the primary sub-architecture). This seems to have the following (unintended?) consequence: Most of my machines are running some version of 64-bit Ubuntu and I do not necessarily have all

G'day all, looking at http://cran.at.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_Sleuth2.html I noticed that r-prerel-* and r-devel-* issue notes. Apparently, now examples are more thoroughly checked by R CMD check and the note pointed out that a package used in the examples was not declared. This was easily fixed by adding 'Suggests: lattice' to the DESCRIPTION file (now this change has

G'day Duncan, On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:32:05 -0500 Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/01/2016 11:59 PM, Berwin A Turlach wrote: > > G'day all, > > > > In Chapter 1.4 (Writing package vignettes) the Writing R Extensions > > manual states: > > > > By default @code{R CMD build} will run @code{Sweave} on all > >

G'day all, In Chapter 1.4 (Writing package vignettes) the Writing R Extensions manual states: By default @code{R CMD build} will run @code{Sweave} on all Sweave vignette source files in @file{vignettes}. If @file{Makefile} is found in the vignette source directory, then @code{R CMD build} will try to run @command{make} after the @code{Sweave} runs, otherwise @code{texi2pdf} is run on

G'day all, probably you have noticed this by now, but I thought I ought to report it. :) My scripts that update the SVN sources for R-patched and R-devel, run `tools/rsync-recommended' (for both) and then install both these versions from scratch failed this morning. Apparently the new version of the recommended package `survival' depends on the recommended package `Matrix', but

G'day Federico, On Wed, 17 May 2023 10:42:17 +0000 "Calboli Federico (LUKE)" <federico.calboli at luke.fi> wrote: > sexsnp = rep(NA, 1750) > for(i in 1:1750){tryCatch(sexsnp[i] = fisher.test(table(data[,3], > data[,i + 38]))$p, error = function(e) print(NA))} Error: unexpected > '=' in "for(i in 1:1750){tryCatch(sexsnp[i] =" Try: R> for(i in

G'day Thomas, On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 04:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Thomas Subia via R-help <r-help at r-project.org> wrote: > Here is my reproducible code for a graph using geom_smooth The call "library(tidyverse)" was missing. :) > I'd like to add a black boundary around the shaded area. I suspect > this can be done with geom_ribbon but I cannot figure this out. Some >

Dear Berwin, Simply stacking the problems and treating the resulting observations as independent will give you the correct coefficients, but incorrect coefficient variances and artificially zero covariances. The approach that I suggested originally -- testing a linear hypothesis using the coefficient estimates and covariances from the multivariate linear model -- seems simple enough. For

I have found a strange scoping problem in Sweave. The following Rnw file doesn't produce the same output in Sweave as it does if I produce an R file using Stangle and execute that: \documentclass[12pt]{article} \begin{document} <<R>>= election <- data.frame(A=1:3, B=9:7, C=rep(0,3)) partytotal <- rep(0, ncol(election)) for (i in 1:ncol(election)) { partytotal[i] <-

G'day all, I have daily scripts running to install the patched version of the current R version and the development version of R on my linux box (Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS). The last development version that was successfully compiled and installed was "R Under development (unstable) (2020-01-25 r77715)" on 27 January. Since then the script always fails as a regression test seems to fail.

Question: I installed R verison 2-12.0 on my Windows 7 (64 bit) PC. When I was installing it, it did not ask me anything about 32 vs. 64 bit. So, if I run R now - is it running as a 32-bit or a 64-bit? thank you! -- Dimitri Liakhovitski Ninah Consulting www.ninah.com

G'day all, since about a week my daily re-compilations of R patched and R devel are falling over, i.e. they stop with an error during "make check" (while building the 32 bit architecture) on my Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS machine. Specifically, a test in graphics-Ex.R seems to fail and the last lines of graphics-ex.Rout.fail are: > ## Extreme outliers; the "FD" rule would

Hey everyone, Thanks for all the input. It's happening again. This time for the packages "DBI", "parallelly", "segmented", "survival", "V8". So, RStudio shows updates for those and updating them via RStudio leads to this output: ``` > install.packages(c("DBI", "parallelly", "segmented", "survival",

G'day Timothy, On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 18:28:00 -0600 Timothy Axberg <axbergtimothy at gmail.com> wrote: > Should I repost the question with reply-all? Nope, we got all from Jeff's post. :) > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Jeff Newmiller > <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: > > > You also need to reply-all so the mailing list stays in the loop. > >

G'day Troels, On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 20:43:10 +0100 Troels Ring <tring at gvdnet.dk> wrote: > Thanks a lot! This was amazing. I'm not sure I see how the conditiion > pK1 < pK2 < pK3 is enforced? One way of enforcing such constraints (well, in finite computer arithemtic only "<=" can be enforced) is to rewrite the parameters as: pK1 = exp(theta1) ##

On 17.04.2016 11:01, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On 17/04/2016 07:25, Berwin A Turlach wrote: >> G'day all, >> >> probably you have noticed this by now, but I thought I ought to report >> it. :) > > Already fixed for Unix by the time this reached me. Since that version > of Survival has been put into 3.2 patched, that also needed its > Makefile.in

I need to make a bunch of PDF files of histograms. I tried gatelist = unique(mdf$ArrivalGate) for( gate in gatelist) { outfile = paste("../", airport, "/", airport, "taxiHistogram", gate, ".pdf", sep="") pdf(file = outfile, width = 10, height=8, par(lwd=1)) title=paste("Taxi time for Arrival Gate", gate, "by

G'day all, I have daily scripts running to install the patched version of the current R version and the development version of R on my linux box (Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS). The last development version that was successfully compiled and installed was "R Under development (unstable) (2019-02-25 r76159)" on 26 February. Since then the script always fails as a regression test seems to

G'day all, I just took over maintenance of the quadprog package from Kurt Hornik and noticed that one of the FORTRAN routines has an argument that is declared to be a LOGICAL. The R code that calls this routine (via the .Fortran interface) passes the argument down wrapped in a call to as.logical(). This was fine (and as documented) under S-Plus 3.4, for which this code was originally