similar to: [OT] DNS queries issue

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53535 Bug #: 53535 Summary: G84M [Quadro NVS 140M] X crash after waking up from suspend: Process /usr/bin/Xorg was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version:

> Date: Monday, August 27, 2018 07:42:48 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of >> Richard Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 7:29 AM > >> >> Since the localhost4 approach worked, commend out the ipv6 >> localhost entries in your /etc/hosts file, then try: >>

On 08/27/2018 09:05 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Richard >> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 7:58 AM >> To: CentOS mailing list >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mail has quit working >> >>> Date: Monday, August 27, 2018 07:42:48 -0400 >>> From: TE Dukes

> Date: Monday, August 27, 2018 09:05:05 -0400 > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of >> Richard Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 7:58 AM >> >> > Date: Monday, August 27, 2018 07:42:48 -0400 >> > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> >> > >>

ISO pulled from http://mirror.rackspace.com/CentOS/6.6/isos/i386/CentOS-6.6-i386-minimal.iso # df -h /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386 Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /var/ISO/CentOS-6.6-i386-minimal.iso 339M 339M 0 100% /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386 # find /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386 -name initr\* /var/distros/CentOS-6.6-i386/isolinux/initrd.img #

Hi all, I have a CentOS 5.4 server-only installation, i.e. no X installed, and for some odd reason /etc/resolve.conf gets overwritten by NetworkManager on a constant basis. I haven't been able to track down how often, but I think it's on the hour, or something. This is the conents of the file right now: # Generated by NetworkManager # No nameservers found; try putting DNS servers into

OS = Ubuntu 18.04 in an LXD container Samba 4.11.x and up Is there a way to have DNS resolution on the server that can coexist with the samba ad dc internal DNS server? The way that I have it set up, whenever samba is not running, then I can't use any web resources b/c everything goes through the samba internal DNS. So I can't do system updates and upgrades unless samba is running. I saw

On 16/02/2020 15:03, Paul Littlefield via samba wrote: > 1) finding a way for ALL 70+ desktops to look up the DCs properly and switch to a running one if one is not available (otherwise what's the point right?) Hello Samba Mailing List, Just to be clear, I am using Ubuntu Server 18.04.4 LTS running Samba 4.7.6 on both DCs. Is this the Samba version I should be using for this

On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 06:51:44PM -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: > I've chacked on that. > I've made what seemed like promissing changes to > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-post and > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/network-functions . > No go. > I still get the search line in resolv.conf . > I've tried putting in search google.com , > but on reboot, it

Hi guys I have implemented xapian on a website, and it currently has about 2M items in its index. Its all been working quite nicely so far, until I tried removing some old items from the index (removing items when the index was smaller was no problems at all). When I try to remove them now (using writabledatabase_delete_document() via php), it halfway freezes up the machine, and the apache

Commit-ID: b86cd0ef3f225b0e68a7c49de2460829f6bfe2be Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=b86cd0ef3f225b0e68a7c49de2460829f6bfe2be Author: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox at ubuntu.com> AuthorDate: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 22:18:23 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 20:12:38 +0100 [klibc] ipconfig: Implement

Whilst ip= command is documented to support dns0:dns1 options as arguments 7 and 8, the -d parser in ipconfig does not. This breaks bringing up static ip configuration with dns nameservers set in the ip= command. Testcase: $ ip link add name dummy0 type dummy $ sudo /usr/lib/klibc/bin/ipconfig -d 10.245.237.7::10.245.237.1:255.255.255.0:ottawa:dummy0:none:8.8.8.8:8.8.4.4 IP-Config: dummy0

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Richard > Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 7:58 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mail has quit working > > > > > Date: Monday, August 27, 2018 07:42:48 -0400 > > From: TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> > > > >> From:

On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 22:18 +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Whilst ip= command is documented to support dns0:dns1 options as > arguments 7 and 8, the -d parser in ipconfig does not. This breaks > bringing up static ip configuration with dns nameservers set in the > ip= command. [...] Applied, thanks. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings - Debian developer, member of kernel, installer and LTS

I have installed CentOS 4.5 and 5 on 2 separate machines, and both have default installs of vim-enhanced on each of them. I noticed that I can get syntax highlighting as a regular user, sudo and as root in C4.5. In C5 I only get highlighting as a regular user. I diff'ed my /etc/vimrc files between each install there is no changes and neither root ~ has a .vimrc file. I had put "# vim:

Thanks Rowland, I have removed from options, and amended the forwarders. [global] workgroup = <MYDOMAIN> realm = <MYDOMAIN>.CORP netbios name = <HOSTNAME> server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes idmap config * : range = 3000-7999 ----------> If I remove the portion I get errors -> idmap

I have asterisk installed on a Dell 2850 dual-Xeon 3.0Ghz box with 2GB of memory. This is serving about 75 sip clients, Polycom500's and 600's. We are running into problems with the memory. Asterisk, right now, is using about 1.8GB of system memory. I am using Asterisk 1.0.7, Zaptel 1.0.7 with Digiums TE410 1xT1 RBS and 1xT1 PRI, Libpri 1.0.7 on Fedora Core 3. My question; is this

Can anyone tell me what might be going on here? Thanks in advance David : Jan 9 22:02:15 dns1 winbindd[19219]: [2010/01/09 22:02:15, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:smb_register_idmap_alloc(201) Jan 9 22:02:15 dns1 winbindd[19219]: idmap_alloc module tdb already registered! Jan 9 22:02:15 dns1 winbindd[19219]: [2010/01/09 22:02:15, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:smb_register_idmap(149) Jan 9 22:02:15 dns1

I want to put a single voice-mail box on a remote server, where I have metered bandwidth. Before I do this, I want to make sure it's feasible. Could someone confirm the following math for me? G.711, at 64kpbs has a rated network load of 88kbps. So for each second of conversation, about 11KB are crossing the wires in each direction. That means for a minute of two-way conversation, 1.3MB

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Jonathan Kreider via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 16 september 2020 2:20 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] AD DC DNS question > > OS = Ubuntu 18.04 in an LXD container > Samba 4.11.x and up > > Is there a way to have DNS resolution on the server