similar to: Reference Classes: how to clone/copy instances?

Dear list, just to make sure that I understand 'unregistering' methods for S4 reference classes correctly: If I registered a method and want to 'unregister' (i.e. remove) this method again, objects/instance created of the respective class still feature the removed method until I do an explicit reassign ('my.instance <- getRefClass("Classname")$new()'), right?

Hi there, I''d like to choose between an "static" and "dynamic" access of a reference class field, say ''a''. myObj <- getRefClass("Blabla")$new() Static: myObj$a Dynamic: myObj$a.get() where the function retrieves the data from a database (or some other location), stores it to a buffer and

Dear list, I wonder how to write methods for the function 'as' in the sense that I can call 'as(object, Class, strict=TRUE, ext)' and let method dispatch figure out the correct method. AFAIU, there is a difference between, e.g. 'as.data.frame' and the methods of 'as()' as stated above since the former depends on arg 'x' instead of 'object',

Dear list, a while ago I posted this at r-devel but got no answers. Hope it?s okay to give it a shot again by cross-posting it here. TIA for any comments, Janko Von: Janko Thyson [mailto:janko.thyson.rstuff at googlemail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 21. Februar 2011 00:58 An: r-devel at r-project. org (r-devel at r-project.org) Betreff: Reference classes: error with missing arguments in method calls

Dear list, I'm wondering if the following error I'm getting is a small bug in the Reference Class paradigm or if it makes perfect sense. When you write an explicit initialize method for a Ref Class, can you then make use of '.self' WITHIN this initialize method just as you would once an object of the class has actually been initialized? Because it seems to me that you can not.

Dear list, is there a shortcut-function to check whether a class is a Reference Class or not? There's something like this for S4 classes ('isS4(object)'), but I couldn't find anything regarding Ref Classes. Currently, I'm doing it this way, which is a bit clumsy: A <- setRefClass("A", fields=list(X="numeric")) a <- A$new() isRefClass <-

Dear list, is it possible that method dispatch checks for superclasses/virtual classes before checking "ANY"? I'd like to build a generic initialization method for all my Reference Class (say "MyDataFrame") objects by having them inherit from class, say "MyRefClassVirtual" (which would have to be a virtual S4 class; there are no virtual Reference Classes,

Dear list, I was wondering if you could help me out in clarifying something: Is it possible to use class "ANY" in slots/fields of formal classes if you a) do not want to restrict valid classes of that field and b) if you are making explicit use of class inheritance? It seems to work in simple scenarios but produces errors when class inheritance comes into play. So I was

Dear list, I have a reference class which should act as a "generic" superclass for other classes. I've read the respective section at ?setRefClass and put the name of the superclass to the 'contains' argument of an example subclass (see class defs below). Classnames are set in a way that shouldn't result in collation issues (virtual def sourced before superclass def

Hi there, is it possible to register fields as you can register methods with getRefClass("Classname")$methods(.)? I know that you should usually give some thought on which fields you need and hardcode them in the class def. But I''m playing around with dynamically creating/extending sort of a template class that already offers basic functionality shared by all objects

Sorry guys, but I chose a really stupid name before (no "reference classes"). Hope it's okay to re-post. Cheers, Janko >>> ORIGINAL MESSAGE <<< Dear list, Is it possible to update or reassign '.self' with an image of '.self' (e.g. a locally stored .Rda file) from within a method? I know that this might sound akward, but here's the use

Dear list, I think I stumbled across a little bug with respect to the standard initialization routine for Reference Classes. It seems that a field 'self' is treated as if it's name would be '.self' (which we know is reserved for the self reference of the instantiated object itself) and thus an error is thrown. If the field value is assigned in an explicit call after the

Dear list, I make use of cached objects extensively for time consuming computations and yesterday I happened to notice some very strange behavior in that respect: When I execute a given computation whose result I'd like to cache (tried both saving it as '.Rdata' and via package 'R.cache' which uses a own filetype '.Rcache'), my R session consumes about 200 MB of

Dear list, I'm getting some strange behavior with Reference Classes every once in a while and I can't really put my finger on the cause. It'd be great if someone using Reference Classes could check if he/she experiences similar problems: The thing is that when I alter the definition of a Reference Class in a running R session and source the respective file containing the class

Dear list, I came across a behavior that IMHO is somewhat undesired when calling '$field()': If the field name whose value you're trying to get is *not* a valid field of the Reference Class, then R doesn't stop there with an error, but scans through all enclosing environments/frames. The result is something similar to calling '|get(<objname>, inherits=TRUE)|'

Hi everyone, just wanted to ask what's the smartest/recommended way of defining getter and setter function *shortcuts* (i.e. something like "[", "[<-") for Reference Class objects? Or is it desired to not use this stuff, but define methods like 'obj$getSubset(row=1:3, col=1)' and 'obj$setSubset(value=x)' instead? I have some example code that might

Dear list, I'm having problems in understanding an error that pops up in the context of missing arguments with methods of reference class objects. Because of the following statement taken from '?referenceClass', my ref class methods call explicit S4 methods: "Reference methods should be kept simple; if they need to do some specialized R computation, that computation

Dear all, I''d like to post input field a short delay after last key press (similar like a delay in autocomplete field). Is there anything already done somewhere, maybe some kind of a streched-down autocomplete field just for such purpose? If no, have anyone an idea how can I do that (as a not very knowledgeable in JavaScript)? Thanks for any help Janko

Dear List, I’m doing my first baby steps towards developing own R Packages and ran into the following problem: R CMD check mypackage works fine (no errors, no warnings) R CMD build mypackage works fine (no errors, no warnings) R CMD INSTALL –library=”C:\R\R-2.11.1\library” “something\mypackage\mypackage_1.0.tar.gz” works fine (no errors, no warnings) However, when I try loading the

Dear List, I’m doing my first baby steps towards developing own R Packages and ran into the following problem: R CMD check mypackage works fine (no errors, no warnings) R CMD build mypackage works fine (no errors, no warnings) R CMD INSTALL –library=”C:\R\R-2.11.1\library” “something\mypackage\mypackage_1.0.tar.gz” works fine (no errors, no warnings) However, when I try loading the