similar to: Bug in agrep computing edit distance?

The documentation for agrep says it uses the Levenshtein edit distance, but it seems to get this wrong in certain cases when there is a combination of deletions and substitutions. For example: > agrep("abcd", "abcxyz", max.distance=1) [1] 1 That should've been a no-match. The edit distance between those strings is 3 (1 substitution, 2 deletions), but agrep matches

I tried to download/compile/install win32-dir, but I couldn''t get it to go. Over a private email Daniel Berger had me... "Curious. What platform are you on exactly? Try modifying the extconf.rb file. Add ''have_library("SHFolder")'' above ''have_library("shell32")''. If that doesn''t work, try uncommenting the other

The documentation for `aggregate` makes it sound like aggregate.formula should behave identically to aggregate.data.frame (apart from the way the parameters are passed). But it looks like aggregate.formula is quietly removing rows where any of the "output" variables (those on the LHS of the formula) are NA. This differs from how aggregate.data.frame works. Is this expected behavior?

Hi, I am an R novice working with financial data. I am developing a portfolio strategy evaluation technique to back-test the performance of our screens; checking how the screened stock would've performed over the period in question. I am using quantmod in R to download the historical data from yahoo and then analyzing it using PerformanceAnalytics. My problem is that, as our screens are done

This is probably fairly well known, I found it by accident while reading about the 0xFF command sperator in older version of bash shell. The newer phf cgi that comes with some versions of picasso and rembrant have been patched for the obvious 0x0A newline escape, but can still be escaped using 0xFF. It takes vulnerabilites in both phf and bash for it to work. I have tested this very

Happy new year everybody, I'm getting the following while trying to use the agrep() function: > pattern <- "XXX" > subject <- c("oooooo", "oooXooo", "oooXXooo", "oooXXXooo") > max <- list(ins=0, del=0, sub=0) # I want exact matches only > agrep(pattern, subject, max=max) [1] 4 OK > max$sub <- 1 # One allowed

"Marcos Sanches" <marcos.sanches at ipsos-opinion.com.br> wrote: Ls1<-length(s1) Ls2<-length(s2) for ( p in 1:ls1){ for (q in 1:ls2){ t1<-levenshteinFast(s1[p],s2[q]) ... Ls1=42000 Ls2=70000 I think I will wait for months untill this program ends. Do you have any sugestion to increase the speed? The first suggestion has to be "search HARD in the

Sure thing: cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login <password is cvs > cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba this will grab samba_2_2 and place it in a directory lableled samba. leaving out the SAMBA_2_2 grabs HEAD. you can get other modules as follows: SAMBA_2_2 HEAD APPLIANCE_HEAD APPLIANCE_TNG there are others but I haven't tried

Hi all. This is my first message at R-help...so I'm hoping I have some beginner's luck and get some good help for my problem! FYI I have just started using R recently so my knowledge of R is pretty preliminary. Okay here is what I need help with - I need to know how to use agrep in a for loop. I need to compare elements of a vector of names with other elements of the same vector.

Same behavior was noted on R 2.9.0 OS X and WIndows. > t(sapply(seq(0.01, .99, length=20), function(x) c(x, length(agrep("Staatssekretar im Bundeskanzleramt","Bundeskanzler",max.distance=x))))) [1,] 0.01000000 0 [2,] 0.06157895 0 [3,] 0.11315789 0 [4,] 0.16473684 0 [5,] 0.21631579 0 [6,] 0.26789474 0 [7,] 0.31947368 0 [8,] 0.37105263 0 [9,]

Hello R Helpers, Business - 64 bit windows 7, R 2.11.1 I am trying to match the character contents of one list, called 'exclude', to those of a second list, called 'dataset' dataset is a list of file names with folder locations, and looks like this when called: > dataset [1] "A/10-10-29a-13.cdf" "A/10-10-29a-14.cdf" "A/10-10-29a-15.cdf"

Estimados R-users: Estoy intentando usar la función 'agrep' para hacer búsquedas en cadenas de texto. El parámetro max.distance permite controlar la medida de aproximación de búsqueda de la función de Levenshtein. No obstante, cuando hago búsquedas específicas no obtengo siempre el resultado deseado y no se si es un bug o que no entiendo bien el algoritmo de búsqueda. Por

Hi all, I have two questions 1 - I have the version 1.4.1 of R, and it doesn't have the 'agrep' function in the base library. Is there a way to make this funcion avaliable in R 1.4.1? I mean, how to 'copy' it from R 1.8.1 and 'paste' it in R 1.4.1? 2 - The AGREP function doesn't give me the Levenshtein distance (edit distance). Is there a function in R that does

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90887 Bug ID: 90887 Summary: PhiMovesPass in register allocator broken Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 Priority: medium Bug ID: 70130 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: unable to compile fragment shader program Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: infyquest at gmail.com Hardware: x86 (IA32)

On 01.09.20 18:21, Helge Deller wrote: > On 01.09.20 17:22, James Bottomley wrote: >> On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 16:05 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:52:40AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: >>>> I think this looks mostly OK, except for one misnamed parameter >>>> below. Unfortunately, the last non-coherent parisc was the 700

According to some old discussion (http://www.mail-archive.com/wine-devel at winehq.com/msg15669.html) on wine-devel it appears that __WINE__ should be the macro used to identify the Wine platform, However, that doesn't appear to work for Windows native MinGW on wine. Here is my test code: #include <stdio.h> int main(int argc, char** argv) { #if defined(__WINE__)

On 01.09.20 17:22, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 16:05 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:52:40AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: >>> I think this looks mostly OK, except for one misnamed parameter >>> below. Unfortunately, the last non-coherent parisc was the 700 >>> series and I no longer own a box, so I can't test

I am an experienced Linux developer but a Wine newbie. Recently I have been exploring the possibility of using CMake-2.8.1 and MinGW-4.5.0 in a Wine-1.1.42 environment (the backported Debian Lenny packages from WineHQ) to check that CMake-based build systems I use for various software projects work properly for that Windows platform. I am collecting notes for a wiki entry I am planning to write

Hello! I have a big problem - I cann't share the printer HP1012. I am using GNU Linux Ubuntu, I try to share the printer, using Samba (when I used RH9, then it was very easy to share the printer and I hadn't any problem with sharing (except PCL, but thats the other story)). So, can you tell me, whats the problem? I use cups. My /etc/smb.conf file: ########## Printing ########## # If you