similar to: OT: Reason/history behind ## notation for comments?

Hi, I want to run t.test() for several variables among two groups, and I would like to skip the tedious process of collecting information to assemble a table, but I am not sure if the function I want already exists. Any suggestion would be appreciated. I have a working example, as required by the posting guide: my_swiss = swiss[-1,] my_swiss$facto = rep(1:2,nrow(my_swiss)/2)

On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 10:47, Doerfert, Johannes <jdoerfert at anl.gov> wrote: > > I still find Phab to be inscrutable. I don't use any of its advanced > > features. I'm a long-time contributor. > > I asked a similar question in this thread in the very beginning: What > actual problems do you have with Phab? There might be usable solutions > out there

1: e-mail is a people skill, you affect people with it. The value of your presentation rises or falls with your skill at presentation. 2: My embedded headless linux targets live in isolated networks, even relative to other computer or network equipment at the target site. At times, the nearest land is 2 miles straight down (ocean floor). 3: These targets are also without

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 2:37 AM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Jun 23, 2020, at 11:02 AM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> > wrote: > > I'll note that reading along I haven't found any of the proposed changes > particularly worthwhile. I'm also not strongly opposed to any of them - I > just don't care

Hola: Me suena algo de que el año pasado alguien dijo algo sobre unas sugerencias de reglas de estilo para escribir código en R. No he oído nada más en esta lista (a lo mejor se me ha pasado por alto) Ayer se publicó un mensaje sobre esto precisamente en un blog en inglés: http://pairach.com/2012/06/06/r-style-guide/ (copiado debajo para facilitar la lectura y comentarios en esta lista)

Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > Granted, GitHub's UI is much "simpler" than Phab, but to my view, this > is not a problem, but a benefit. > > If we moved to GitHub PRs today, I wouldn't miss a thing. +1. I still find Phab to be inscrutable. I don't use any of its advanced features. I'm a long-time contributor. I

Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: > > >>>> Isn't is possible for cmake just to glob everything in the corresponding >>>> directory? >>>> >>>> >>> Yes, but then the build would not notice a change on the file >>> structure. You'll need to explicitly invoke

I'm a newbie at Dovecot. For a company groupware I need a kind of a history function for mails to see which user sent which mail to whom / got which mail from whom. So I have to get the message ID of in- and outgoing mails (and write related data to a mysql database). My first idea was to monitor the log file with a daemon and search for strings like "deliver(x at y.z): 2010-11-15

Hi all, I'd like to propose that Lang Hames be made code owner of the MCJIT, RuntimeDyld and JIT event listener components. For those who don't know, I am the current code owner, but I have not had the time recently to make the level of contributions I had in the past while Lang has been doing outstanding work in this area and has taken on a de facto leadership role in guiding MCJIT

> Yes, let me validate Mr. Kovacs comment. I am aware of the shortcomings > of NIS in the area of security. Let me provide some information on the > topography of my network and my reasoning for choosing NIS/NFS. Perhaps > an alternative may be suggested to meet my needs without totally > confounding me when it comes to configuration. The good thing about YP/NIS is that

We have an R package which needs to include a JAR file. Is there a canonical directory for it?

On Jul 30, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Stephen Lin wrote: >> Right. What's the point of all the effort devoted to MSVC++ ABI >> compatibility when Clang doesn't need it for being a top-notch C++ >> compiler on Windows? > > I brought up a similar point a little bit earlier, too.... > > It seems like the only necessary condition for being a first-class >

Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: >>> Isn't is possible for cmake just to glob everything in the corresponding >>> directory? >>> >> >> Yes, but then the build would not notice a change on the file >> structure. You'll need to explicitly invoke cmake for being sure that >> whatever changes were made by the last svn

Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> writes: > The LLVM test suite requires expect as a dependency of DejaGNU. The > stock source of expect requires a *NIX fork, so it's relatively > difficult to build under MinGW even though Tk/Tcl is easy to build > under MinGW. (I'm not aware of a precompiled MinGW binary for expect, > although it might be in one of the more

I haven't been able to spend much time with LLVM's register allocators lately, so I think it would make sense for somebody else to take over as the regalloc code owner. Quentin has volunteered for the job; he has been the de facto code owner for the last couple of years. Let's make it official. Thanks, /jakob

Hi all, FYI, Microsoft has added FLAC support to their latest preview build (9926 to be specific) of Windows 10 last month. Support in this case means FLAC plays back in Windows Media Player (or any other application using the same framework) without having to install any plugins. Support for metadata is still limited, but this might improve before the final release. Microsoft has also

On 28 Nov 2012, at 19:41, Tanya Lattner wrote: > So why isn't this caught by any of the regression testing (testsuite) if it nothing above -O1 can be compiled? I assume you mean for your project? Any Objective-C on non-Apple platforms that uses cleanups (including those Clang inserts for blocks) breaks in certain cases with inlining. There are also some cases in C++, and cases in LTO (or

I am interested in finding out your experiences with using the dbox format (especially mdbox) if you use this format. I am contemplating changing my maildir setup to mdbox but I still need to make a case for it against maildir which has become a de-facto standard and provides sort of a secure basis in case of software changes. Your input will be appreciated. -- Andreas Kasenides Senior IT

Am Sa., 16. Nov. 2019 um 10:56 Uhr schrieb John McCall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Anyway, if we had that Clang-level library, t would be fairly > straightforward for someone interoperating with the C ABI to just > construct the appropriate Clang types and call those APIs. The main motivation is to have ABI-emitting code (in particular for OpenMP) shared between

Does anyone know any more than is in the following press release about REvolution Computing and their commercialization of R? http://www.intel.com/capital/news/releases/080122.htm "Intel Capital, the global investment arm of Intel Corporation, today announced that it has invested in the Series A financing of REvolution Computing, creator of parallel computing software for computational