similar to: Table vs unique

Is the phrase "index <- match(x, sort(unique(x)))" reliable, in the sense that it will never return NA? Context: Calculation of survival curves involves the concept of unique death times. I've had reported cases in the past where survfit failed, and it was due to the fact that two "differ by machine precision" values would sometimes match and sometimes not,

First a statistical issue: The survfit routine will produce predicted survival curves for any requested combination of the covariates in the original model. This is not the same thing as an "adjusted" survival curve. Confusion on this is prevalent, however. True adjustment requires a population average over the confounding factors and is closely related to the standardized

Dear all, I am confused with the output of survfit.coxph. Someone said that the survival given by summary(survfit.coxph) is the baseline survival S_0, but some said that is the survival S=S_0^exp{beta*x}. Which one is correct? By the way, if I use "newdata=" in the survfit, does that mean the survival is estimated by the value of covariates in the new data frame? Thank you very much!

I am confused when trying the function survfit. my question is: what does the survival curve given by plot.survfit mean? is it the survival curve with different covariates at different points? or just the baseline survival curve? for example, I run the following code and get the survival curve #### library(survival) fit<-coxph(Surv(futime,fustat)~resid.ds+rx+ecog.ps,data=ovarian)

Hi Dear R-users I have a database with 18000 observations and 20 variables. I am running cox regression on five variables and trying to use survfit to plot the survival based on a specific variable without success. Lets say I have the following coxph: >library(survival) >fit <- coxph(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age + rx, data = ovarian) >fit what I am trying to do is plot a survival

This works ok: > cox = coxph(surv ~ bucket*(today + accor + both) + activity, data = data) > fit = survfit(cox, newdata=data[1:100,]) but using strata leads to problems: > cox.s = coxph(surv ~ bucket*(today + accor + both) + strata(activity), > data = data) > fit.s = survfit(cox.s, newdata=data[1:100,]) Error in model.frame.default(data = data[1:100, ], formula = ~bucket + :

Dear all, I'm having difficulty getting access to data generated by survfit and print.survfit when they are using with a Cox model (survfit.coxph). I would like to programmatically access the median survival time for each strata together with the 95% confidence interval. I can get it on screen, but can't get to it algorithmically. I found myself examining the source of print.survfit to

In the next version of the survival package I intend to make a non-upwardly compatable change to the survfit object.? With over 600 dependent packages this is not something to take lightly, and I am currently undecided about the best way to go about it.? I'm looking for advice. The change: 20+ years ago I had decided not to include the initial x=0,y=1 data point in the survfit object

Dear useRs, What is the syntax to obtain survival curves for single strata on many subjects? I have a model based on Surv(time,response) object, so there is a single row per subject and no start,stop and no switching of strata. The newdata has many subjects and each subject has a strata and the survival based on the subject risk and the subject strata is needed. If I do newpred <-

I am fitting a coxph model on a large dataset (approx 100,000 patients), and then trying to estimate the survival curves for several new patients based on the coxph object using survfit. When I run coxph I get the coxph object back fairly quickly however when I try to run survfit it does not come back. I am wondering if their is a more efficient way to get predicted survival curves from a coxph

i want to make survival plots for a coxph object using survfit function. mod.phm is an object of coxph class which calculated results using columns X and Y from the DataFrame. Both X and Y are categorical. I want survival plots which shows a single line for each of the categories of X i.e. '4' and 'C'. I am getting the following error: > attach(DataFrame) >

I have a model with quant vars only and the error message does not make sense: (mod1 <- coxph(Surv(time=strt,time2=stp,event=(resp==1))~ +incpost+I(amt/1e5)+rate+strata(termfac), subset=dt<"2010-08-30", data=inc,method="efron")) Call: coxph(formula = Surv(time = strt, time2 = stp, event = (resp == 1)) ~ +incpost + I(amt/1e+05) + rate + strata(termfac),

> On Jun 1, 2019, at 12:59 PM, Peter Langfelder <peter.langfelder at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 3:22 AM Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel > <r-devel at r-project.org> wrote: >> >> In the next version of the survival package I intend to make a non-upwardly compatable >> change to the survfit object. With over 600 dependent packages

Dear users, In a study with recurrent events: My objective is to get estimates of survival (obtained through a Cox model) by rank of recurrence and by treatment group. With the following code (corresponding to a model with a global effect of the treatment=rx), I get no error and manage to obtain what I want : data<-(bladder)

Hello, I'm using plot.survfit to plot cumulative incidence of an event. Essentially, my code boils down to: cox <-coxph(Surv(EVINF,STATUS) ~ strata(TREAT) + covariates, data=dat) surv <- survfit(cox) plot(surv,mark.time=F,fun="event") Follow-up time extends to 54 weeks, but the last event occurs at week 30, and no more people are censored in between. Is there a

Hi, if I got it right then the survival-time we expect for a subject is the integral over the specific survival-function of the subject from 0 to t_max. If I have a trained cox-model and want to make a prediction of the survival-time for a new subject I could use survfit(coxmodel, newdata=newSubject) to estimate a new survival-function which I have to integrate thereafter. Actually I thought

Hello, I'm trying to estimate a Cox proportional hazard model with time-varying covariates using coxph. The parameter estimates are fine but there is something wrong with the survival curves I get with survfit (results are not plausible). Let me explain why I think something's wrong. To make sure I'm setting up my data correctly to estimate a model with time-varying covariates, I

Hello users, I would like to obtain a survival curve from a Cox model that is smooth and does not have zero differences due to no events for those particular days. I have: > sum((diff(surv))==0) [1] 18 So you can see 18 days where the survival curve did not drop due to no events. Is there a way to ask survfit to fit a nice spline for the survival?? Note: I tried survreg and it did not

I?m trying to set up proportional hazard model that is stratified with respect to covariate 1 and has an interaction between covariate 1 and another variable, covariate 2. Both variables are categorical. In the following, I try to illustrate the two problems that I?ve encountered, using the lung dataset. The first problem is the warning: To me, it seems that there are too many dummies

> Dear All, > > I have built a survival cox-model, which includes a covariate * time interaction. (non-proportionality detected) > I am now wondering how could I most easily get survival predictions from my model. > > My model was specified: > coxph(formula = Surv(event_time_mod, event_indicator_mod) ~ Sex + > ageC + HHcat_alt + Main_Branch + Acute_seizure +