similar to: Indexing bug?

I have found a strange scoping problem in Sweave. The following Rnw file doesn't produce the same output in Sweave as it does if I produce an R file using Stangle and execute that: \documentclass[12pt]{article} \begin{document} <<R>>= election <- data.frame(A=1:3, B=9:7, C=rep(0,3)) partytotal <- rep(0, ncol(election)) for (i in 1:ncol(election)) { partytotal[i] <-

G'day all, In Chapter 1.4 (Writing package vignettes) the Writing R Extensions manual states: By default @code{R CMD build} will run @code{Sweave} on all Sweave vignette source files in @file{vignettes}. If @file{Makefile} is found in the vignette source directory, then @code{R CMD build} will try to run @command{make} after the @code{Sweave} runs, otherwise @code{texi2pdf} is run on

G'day Duncan, On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:32:05 -0500 Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/01/2016 11:59 PM, Berwin A Turlach wrote: > > G'day all, > > > > In Chapter 1.4 (Writing package vignettes) the Writing R Extensions > > manual states: > > > > By default @code{R CMD build} will run @code{Sweave} on all > >

G'day all, I am not sure whether I should file this as a bug report, but I thought that I should make the developers of R aware of the following feature: I have just installed R 2.0.0 and when I run "R CMD check" on the source of some packages, I noticed that the XXX-examples.ps file contains one page with two graphics overlaid. This seems to happen when the first graphic is

Hi, I am trying to recreate the right graph on page 524 of Gelman's 2006 paper "Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models" in Bayesian Analysis, 3, 515-533. I am only interested, however, in recreating the portion of the graph for the overlain prior density for the half-Cauchy with scale 25 and not the posterior distribution. However, when I try:

Hey everyone, Thanks for all the input. It's happening again. This time for the packages "DBI", "parallelly", "segmented", "survival", "V8". So, RStudio shows updates for those and updating them via RStudio leads to this output: ``` > install.packages(c("DBI", "parallelly", "segmented", "survival",

Question: I installed R verison 2-12.0 on my Windows 7 (64 bit) PC. When I was installing it, it did not ask me anything about 32 vs. 64 bit. So, if I run R now - is it running as a 32-bit or a 64-bit? thank you! -- Dimitri Liakhovitski Ninah Consulting www.ninah.com

G'day Erin, On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 08:00:38 -0600 Erin Hodgess <erinm.hodgess at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm in the process of writing a package, and I'm using the lovely "R > Package" book as a guideline. > > However, in the midst of my work, I discovered that I had omitted a > function and am now putting in it the package. Not a problem. But > the

<<insert bug report here>> This is a CRITICAL bug!!! I have verified it in R 2.8.1 for mac and for windows. The problem is with loess degree=0 smoothing. For example, try the following: x <- 1:100 y <- rnorm(100) plot(x, y) lines(predict(loess(y ~ x, degree=0, span=0.5))) This is obviously wrong. R 2.8 --please do not edit the information below-- Version: platform

G'day all, I have daily scripts running to install the patched version of the current R version and the development version of R on my linux box (Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS). The last development version that was successfully compiled and installed was "R Under development (unstable) (2020-01-25 r77715)" on 27 January. Since then the script always fails as a regression test seems to fail.

Hello list. I feel like an idiot. There exists a method called expand.grid which, from the documentation, appears to do just what I want, but then it doesn''t, and I can''t get it to behave. Given a dataframe dfr<-data.frame(c1=c("a", "b", NA, "a", "a"), c2=c("d", NA, "d", "e", "e"),

G'day Federico, On Wed, 17 May 2023 10:42:17 +0000 "Calboli Federico (LUKE)" <federico.calboli at luke.fi> wrote: > sexsnp = rep(NA, 1750) > for(i in 1:1750){tryCatch(sexsnp[i] = fisher.test(table(data[,3], > data[,i + 38]))$p, error = function(e) print(NA))} Error: unexpected > '=' in "for(i in 1:1750){tryCatch(sexsnp[i] =" Try: R> for(i in

G'day all, I have daily scripts running to install the patched version of the current R version and the development version of R on my linux box (Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS). The last development version that was successfully compiled and installed was "R Under development (unstable) (2019-02-25 r76159)" on 26 February. Since then the script always fails as a regression test seems to

Hi everyone, I am trying to use the function as.date() from the "dates" package in R 2.10.0 to convert a character date to a Julian date, as follows: > as.date("02-MAY-01", order="mdy") # convert May 2, 2001 to a Julian date [1] 2May1 However, when trying to convert a character date from the year 2000 to a Julian date, I get an <NA> instead of the desired

Dear R-helpers, apologies if this is somewhere in a manual, I have not been able to find anything relevant. I run Windows Vista. I have some Fortran code in a subroutine, and have no problem calling this from R with .Fortran, compiling the code either with 'R CMD SHLIB' or independently with gfortran. But is it possible to have more than one subroutine in my source file, one depending

G'day Thomas, On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 04:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Thomas Subia via R-help <r-help at r-project.org> wrote: > Here is my reproducible code for a graph using geom_smooth The call "library(tidyverse)" was missing. :) > I'd like to add a black boundary around the shaded area. I suspect > this can be done with geom_ribbon but I cannot figure this out. Some >

Hello everyone! I'm in the process of writing a package, and I'm using the lovely "R Package" book as a guideline. However, in the midst of my work, I discovered that I had omitted a function and am now putting in it the package. Not a problem. But the problem is the help file. What is the best way to generate a help file "after the fact" like that, please? Thank

Hello! I am writing some functions and I repeatedly acces internal factor codes. I figured out that internal codes are 1:n where 1 represents 1st level, 2 2nd level etc. This is not documented and I wonder if this is on purpose and subject to change or would be a good idea to add this to documentation for factor? I can prepair a pacth if this is accepted. -- Lep pozdrav / With regards,

## While in R v. 2.3.1 (the mid-July patch for Windows) ## on a Windows XP machine, this call to order() works fine... order(1:10,decreasing = TRUE) ## [1] 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ## ...however, the argument name 'decreasing' ## must be typed in toto (note the missing 'g' ## in the following): > order(1:10,decreasin = TRUE) ## Error in order(na.last, decreasing, ...) :

The help page for mean does not say what happens when one applies mean to a matrix. mean and sd work in an inconsistent way on a matrix so that should at least be documented. Also there should be a See Also to colMeans since that provides the missing column-wise analog to sd.