similar to: BIC() in "stats" {was [R-sig-ME] how to extract the BIC value}

Hi, I have been having a tedious issue with lmer models with lots of factors and lots of levels. In order to get the basic information at the beginning of the print out I also have to generate these enormous tables as well. Is there a method command to leave off all of the effects and correlations? Or, do I have to go to string commands?

Hi all, I am having issues comparing models with lmer. As an example, when I run the code below the model summaries (AIC, BIC, loglik) differ between the summary() and anova() commands. Can anyone clear up what's wrong? Thank you! Darren Ward library(lme4) data(sleepstudy) fm1<-lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (1|Subject), sleepstudy) summary(fm1) fm2<-lmer(Reaction ~ Days +

Hi, Thanks for your response, it nearly worked! But it only wrote one coloumn of data and not the three columns I need. Using fixef(m1) doesnt give the same results as coef(m1) when you are using more than one random effect. I need the coefficients for each individual so I use coef(m1) to get this which results in an object of class lmer.coef, 3 columns by 700 rows. as.data.frame() wont work on

Full_Name: Dale Barr Version: 2.5.1 (patched) OS: Ubuntu linux x86_64 Submission from: (NULL) (138.23.70.108) When RMySQL is loaded in before lme4, the summary() function for lmer objects in the lme4 packages produces the following error: Error in printMer(object) : no slot of name "status" for this object of class "table" When RMySQL is loaded AFTER lme4, however, no such

LS, I'm estimating multilevel regression models, using the lme-function from the nlme-package. Let's say that I estimated a model and stored it inside the object named 'model'. The summary of that model is shown below: Using summary(model)$tTable , I receive the following output: > summary(model)$tTable Value Std.Error DF t-value

I'm using R 2.0.1. I looked in the email archives but didn't see anything on this topic. I've noticed a surprising (to me) difference between AIC and BIC: > methods("AIC") [1] AIC.default* AIC.logLik* > methods("BIC") [1] BIC.gls* BIC.lm* BIC.lme* BIC.lmList* BIC.logLik* BIC.nls* The BIC.gls BIC.lm BIC.lme BIC.lmList and BIC.nls functions appear

Dear list, I am looking for a function/way to get the array coordinates of given elements in an array. What I mean is the following: - Let X be a 3D array - I find the ordering of the elements of X by ord <- order(X) (this returns me a vector) - I now want to find the x,y,z coordinates of each element of ord Can anyone help me? Thanks! Ana

Dear R-List I have a question about how to interpret BIC as a goodness-of-fit statistic. I was trying to use "EMclust" and other "mclust" library and found that BIC was used as a goodness-of-fit statistic. Although I know that smaller BIC indicates a better fit, it is not clear to me how good a fit is by reading a BIC number. Is there a standard way of interpreting a BIC

Hi, My questions concern the function 'mclustBIC' which compute BIC for a range of clusters of several models on the given data and the other function 'mclustModel' which choose the best model and the best number of cluster accordind to the results of the previous cited function. 1) When trying the following example (see ?mclustModel), I get negative BIC computed by

Hello, I am working on getting optimal lags by using BIC, But I don't know how to calculate BIC. Is there any code or useful function for it? Thanks and regards, Dan Zhao

Martin (see below) gives a good explanation of the difference between AD and symbolic differentiations. I'm of the opinion we can use both. However, the real issue as far as I'm concerned (from an optimizer's point of view, which may also be that of ODE and PDE folk) is that right now none of the offerings that we have are easy to use. Indeed, usability is one of the key issues in my

Hi all, I would like to know how the BIC criterion is calculated for models estimated using gls( ) function. I read in Pinheiro & Bates (2000) p84 that BIC = -2logL + npar*log(N) (for the ML method), or BIC = -2logLR + npar*log(N-p) (for the REML method) but when I use any of these formulae I don't obtain the result given by R. Thanks in advance for any help. Eve CORDA Office national

Hi All, Could someone help me decode what this error means ? > BIC(nb.80) Error in log(attr(object, "nobs")) : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function > BTW, nb.80 is a negative binomial glm model created using the MASS library with the call at the bottom of the message In the hopes of trying to figure this out I tried the following workaround but it did not work

I'm coming from the AMOS world and am wondering if there is a simple way to do multiple hypothesis testing in the manner of BIC analyses in AMOS using the sem package in R. I've read the documentation, but don't see anything in there except for basic BIC scores. Perhaps someone has devised a simple way to compare the relative likelihood of all possible path-fittings within a

Hi All,  In order to compare two different logistic regressions, I think I need to compare them based on their BIC values, but I am not sure if the smaller BIC would mean a better model or the reverse is true? Thanks a lot,Andra [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi All: the package "MuMIn" can be used to select the model based on AIC or AICc. The code is as follows: data(Cement) lm1 <- lm(y ~ ., data = Cement) dd <- dredge(lm1,rank="AIC") print(dd) If I want to select the model by BIC, what code do I need to use? And when to select the best model based on AIC, what the differences between the function "dredge" in

Full_Name: Ju-Sung Lee Version: 2.2.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (66.93.61.221) BIC() requires the attribute $nobs from the logLik object but the logLik of a glm(formula,family=binomial()) object does not include $nobs. Adding attr(obj,'nobs') = value, seems to allow BIC() to work. Reproducing the problem: library(nmle); BIC(logLik(glm(1~1,family=binomial())));

Hi Folks, I've got a question concerning the calculation of the Schwarz-Criterion (BIC) done by summary.regsubsets() of the leaps-package: Using regsubsets() to perform subset-selection I receive an regsubsets object that can be summarized by summary.regsubsets(). After this operation the resulting summary contains a vector of BIC-values representing models of size i=1,...,K. My problem

Dear all, is there a function similar to extractAIC based on which I can extract the BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion) of a coxph model? I found some functions that provide BIC in other packages, but none of them seems to work with coxph. Thanks, Michael [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, Is there any package for logistic model selection using BIC and Mallow's Cp statistic? If not, then kindly suggest me some ways to deal with these problems. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stepwise-logistic-model-selection-using-Cp-and-BIC-criteria-tf4464430.html#a12729613 Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.