similar to: R CMD check tells me 'no visible binding for globalvariable'

Dear all, I am having a (really) hard time getting pyears to work together with a ratetable to give me the number of expected events (deaths). I have the following data: dos, date of surgery, as.Date dof, date of last follow-up, as.Date dos, date of surgery, as.Date sex, gender, as.factor (female,male) ev, event(death), 0= censored at time point dof, 1=death at time point dof Could someone

I am not sure if this is the right place for that kind of questions, but I wondered that the recommended package survival did not pass R's check procedure without warnings: 1) unbalanced braces: * Rd files with unbalanced braces: * man/Surv.Rd * man/cluster.Rd * man/cox.zph.Rd * man/coxph.Rd * man/coxph.detail.Rd * man/date.ddmmmyy.Rd * man/lines.survfit.Rd *

> I was wondering why survreg (in survival package) can not handle > three-way interactions. I have an AFT ..... You have given us no data to diagnose your problem. What do you mean by "cannot handle" -- does the package print a message "no 3 way interactions", gives wrong answers, your laptop catches on fire when you run it, ....? Also, make sure you read

Dear List, Is there an automated way to use the survival package to generate survival rate estimates and their standard errors? To be clear, *not *the survivorship estimates (which are cumulative), but the survival *rate * estimates... Thank you in advance for any help. Best, Brian [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

When I run R CMD check on a package I have recently started work on I get the following: * checking R code for possible problems ... NOTE addlinear: no visible binding for global variable 'x' I appreciate that this is only a NOTE and so I assume is R's equivalent of 'This is perfectly legal but I wonder whether it is really what you intended' but I would like to understand

A few weeks ago I reported a problem with model.frame, whose root lay in a formula expression "....+ ratetable(x1=x1, x2=x2, ....x100=x100)" that was really long and caused model.frame to fail. Brian had some indefinite ideas on what might need to change in the base code to handle it. In survival_2.36-1 the bit of code that generated the offending expression has been changed (mostly

Hi, I would like to step-through a non-visible function. but apparently I don't know enough about namespaces to get that to work: > methods(predict) ... deleted lines ... [27] predict.rpart* predict.smooth.spline* [31] predict.survreg.penal* Non-visible functions are asterisked > debug(predict.rpart) Error: Object "predict.rpart" not found >

Consider the following example (based on an example in Pat Altham's GLM notes) pyears <- scan() 18793 52407 10673 43248 5710 28612 2585 12663 1462 5317 deaths <- scan() 2 32 12 104 28 206 28 186 31 102 Smoke <- gl(2,1,10,labels=c("No","Yes")) Age <- gl(5,2,10,labels=c("35-44","45-54","55-64","65-74","75-84"),

Good Day, I have been tasked with fixing the time on our asterisk server. I am having a hard time finding documentation to tell my what asterisk uses to get its time information to push to phones (or a better question, where does the SPA-962 get its time information)? Basically, I can go under the settings of the phone and change the offset to set the correct hour, but it is still about 4

Hi, Do you know the existence of networks of volunteers in the ruby on rails community willing to be involved or being consulted sometime for humanitarian projects? (I saw a website about that a long time ago , but I don''t remember its name) Thanks! Nicolas -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby

Dear R-Helpers: I have tried everything I can think of and hope not to appear too foolish when my error is pointed out to me. I have some real data (18 points) that look linear on a log-log plot so I used them for a comparison of lm() and survreg. There are no suspensions. survreg.df <- data.frame(Cycles=c(2009000, 577000, 145000, 376000, 37000, 979000, 17420000, 71065000, 46397000,

Dear R-user: I am using survreg(Surv()) for fitting a Tobit model of left-censored longitudinal data. For logarithmic transformation of y data, I am trying use survreg.distributions in the following way: tfit=survreg(Surv(y, y>=-5, type="left")~x + cluster(id), dist="gaussian", data=y.data, scale=0, weights=w) my.gaussian<-survreg.distributions$gaussian

Hey all, I am trying to use the survreg function in R to estimate the mean and standard deviation to come up with the MLE of alpha and lambda for the weibull distribution. I am doing the following: times<-c(10,13,18,19,23,30,36,38,54,56,59,75,93,97,104,107,107,107) censor<-c(1,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,0) survreg(Surv(times,censor),dist='weibull') and I get the following

Hello, I have some measurements that I am trying to fit a model to. I also have uncertainties for these measurements. Some of the measurements are not well detected, so I'd like to use a limit instead of the actual measurement. (I am always dealing with upper limits, i.e. left censored data.) I have successfully run survreg using the combination of well detected measurements and limits,

I am trying to model survival data with a Weibull distribution using survreg. Units are clustered two apiece, sometimes receiving the same treatment and sometimes opposing treatment.

Hi, Is it normal to get intercept in the list of covariates in the output of survreg function with standard error, z, p.value etc? Does it mean that intercept was fitted with the covariates? Does Value column represent coefficients or some thing else? Regards, ------------------------------------------------- tmp = survreg(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ ecog.ps + rx, ovarian,

Hi all, Sorry if this has been answered already, but I couldn't find it in the archives or general internet. Is it possible to implement the gompertz distribution as survreg.distribution to use with survreg of the survival library? I haven't found anything and recent attempts from my side weren't succefull so far. I know that other packages like 'eha' and

Dear R help list, I am modeling some survival data with coxph and survreg (dist='weibull') using package survival. I have 2 problems: 1) I do not understand how to interpret the regression coefficients in the survreg output and it is not clear, for me, from ?survreg.objects how to. Here is an example of the codes that points out my problem: - data is stc1 - the factor is dichotomous

Folks, Based on http://www.biostat.wustl.edu/archives/html/s-news/1999-06/msg00125.html I thought I should experiment with using survreg() to estimate tobit models. I start by simulating a data frame with 100 observations from a tobit model > x1 <- runif(100) > x2 <- runif(100)*3 > ystar <- 2 + 3*x1 - 4*x2 + rnorm(100)*2 > y <- ystar > censored <- ystar <= 0

1. The weibull is the only distribution that can be written in both a proportional hazazrds for and an accelerated failure time form. Survreg uses the latter. In an ACF model, we model the time to failure. Positive coefficients are good (longer time to death). In a PH model, we model the death rate. Positive coefficients are bad (higher death rate). You are not the first to be confused