similar to: R_LIBS_USER bugs

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "R_LIBS_USER bugs"

2010 Jan 04
1
bin/exec/R coredumps (PR#14177)
Full_Name: Jens Elkner Version: 2.10.1 OS: Solaris Submission from: (NULL) (87.188.113.172) elkner.idev2 elkner/build/R-2.10.1 > bin/exec/R -e Segmentation fault (core dumped) elkner.idev2 elkner/build/R-2.10.1 > dbx bin/exec/R core For information about new features see `help changes' To remove this message, put `dbxenv suppress_startup_message 7.7' in your .dbxrc Reading R core
2020 Mar 19
1
R CMD check --as-cran attempts to hide R_LIBS_USER but fails
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 8:04 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote: > > > On 18 March 2020 at 19:19, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > | AFAIU, 'R CMD check --as-cran' tries to hide any site and user package > | libraries by setting R_LIBS_SITE and R_LIBS_USER. However, contrary > > What makes you think that? AFAIK --as-cran just sets a bunch of the (nearly
2020 Mar 19
2
R CMD check --as-cran attempts to hide R_LIBS_USER but fails
AFAIU, 'R CMD check --as-cran' tries to hide any site and user package libraries by setting R_LIBS_SITE and R_LIBS_USER. However, contrary to R_LIBS_SITE, it fails for R_LIBS_USER and the user's personal library is still available for test scripts. Should I revise my assumptions, or is that intentional? The short version. Shouldn't: $ R_LIBS_USER='' Rscript --vanilla -e
2017 Sep 16
1
R_LIBS_USER not in libPaths
I have not intentionally set R_LIBS_USER. I looked for an Renviron.site file but did not see it in R/etc or my home directory. The strange part is that if I print Sud.getenv I see a value for R_LIBS_USER. However, this directory is not showing under libPaths. I though .libPaths should contain R_LIBS_USER. I also noticed that R related variables are not in the system or user variables because I
2017 Sep 16
0
R_LIBS_USER not in libPaths
I'm not sure I follow what.the problem is. Are you trying to set R_LIBS_USER but R does not acknowledge it, or do you observe something in R that you didn't expect to be there and you are trying to figure out why that is / where that happens? Henrik On Sep 16, 2017 07:10, "Rene J Suarez-Soto" <rene.j.suarez at gmail.com> wrote: > I have a computer where R_LIBS_USER is
2017 Jul 03
3
R_LIBS_USER on Ubuntu 16.04
Dear all, the recent update to R-3.4.1 kind of screwed the path to the libraries installed on a user basis. The previous version of the file /etc/R/Renviron had the following line activated: R_LIBS_USER=${R_LIBS_USER-'~/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/3.4'} This one is commented in the current one which means that the path to the libraries installed previously is not found. I never
2017 Sep 16
4
R_LIBS_USER not in libPaths
I have a computer where R_LIBS_USER is not found in libPaths. This is for Windows (x64). I ran R from the command line, RGui and RStudio and I get the same results. I also ran R --vanilla and I still get the discrepancy. The only thing I found interesting was that I also ran SET from the command line and the "R related variables" (e.g., R_HOME; R_LIBS_USER) are not there. Therefore
2013 Jun 12
1
Windows R_LIBS_USER confusion under R-3.0.1
I would appreciate ideas about MS Windows install issues. I'm at our stats summer camp and have been looking at a lot of Windows R installs and there are some wrinkles about R_LIBS_USER. On a clean Win7 or Win8 system, with R-3.0.1, we see the user library for packages defaulting to $HOME/R/win-library. I think that's awesome, the way it should be. Yea! But it does not appear that way
2014 Apr 01
1
Head's up: Renviron change in R_LIBS_USER to 3.1
Hi Here's a warning for you. If you start R today and it can't find any packages in your home directory that it did find yesterday, don't faint. You'll see something like this: > library(data.table) Error in library(data.table) : there is no package called 'data.table' and your user home folder R packages will no longer appear in path: > .libPaths() [1]
2023 Mar 17
1
Request: better default R_LIBS_USER
> Your best bet really to govern your .libPaths from your Rprofile.site and Renviron.site ... To do this for any version of R, one can add: R_LIBS_USER=~/.local/share/R/%p-library/%v to ~/.Renviron or the Renviron.site file. This automatically expands to the platform and R x.y version early on when R starts up, e.g. ~/.local/share/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.2. > rather than asking a
2009 Oct 27
0
help.start() only recognizes forward slashes in R_LIBS_USER which is not the default case
I've found that the HTML help system started via help.start() requires all forward slashes in R_LIBS_USER otherwise the Packages page is corrupt/non-working. Note that by default R_LIBS_USER is set by R on startup. Example 1: With R_LIBS_USER=C:/Users/JohnDoe/R/win-library/2.10 > help.start() [and go to "Packages"] If nothing happens, you should open
2017 Jul 02
2
/etc/R/Renviron doesn't set R_LIBS_USER anymore
Hi An upgrade to R 3.4.1 on Ubuntu removed the default setting of R_LIBS_USER in /etc/R/Renviron. What's the rationale behind this? Thanks. Best regards Kirill
2023 Mar 16
2
Request: better default R_LIBS_USER
On 16 March 2023 at 13:39, Felipe Contreras wrote: | I see R by default installs packages in ~/R. I know I can change the | default directory with R_LIBS_USER, but software shouldn't be | polluting the home directory. | | For example both python and node install packages to ~/.local/lib, | ruby to ~/.local/share. They don't install to for example ~/node. | | R should do the same: it
2008 Oct 16
1
attaching 2nd vol unsupported?
Hi, im trying to attach another volume aka disk to win HVM, however it doesn''t seem to work: + xm block-attach win2008ss phy:/dev/zvol/dsk/pool1/win2008ss.dsk2 \ hdd:disk w 0 results in: elkner.sol ~ > + xm block-list win2008ss --long (0 (vbd (uuid 7cb8fadf-619d-dde6-bda9-dcc18023c7d5) (bootable 1) (devid 768) (driver paravirtualised)
2010 Feb 20
2
R logo as SVG ?
Hi, does anybody have the R logo in a vector format preferable SVG? Need it for Freedesktop (GNOME desktop) integration of Rcmdr ... Thanx, jel. -- Otto-von-Guericke University http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/ Department of Computer Science Geb. 29 R 027, Universitaetsplatz 2 39106 Magdeburg, Germany Tel: +49 391 67 12768
2017 Jul 02
3
/etc/R/Renviron doesn't set R_LIBS_USER anymore
On 02.07.2017 22:01, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 2 July 2017 at 21:39, Kirill M?ller wrote: > | Hi > | > | An upgrade to R 3.4.1 on Ubuntu removed the default setting of > | R_LIBS_USER in /etc/R/Renviron. What's the rationale behind this? Thanks. > > Pretty much exactly what I told you in person last week :) > > - idea is to prefer /usr/local/lib/R/site-library/
2023 Mar 16
1
Request: better default R_LIBS_USER
Hi, I see R by default installs packages in ~/R. I know I can change the default directory with R_LIBS_USER, but software shouldn't be polluting the home directory. For example both python and node install packages to ~/.local/lib, ruby to ~/.local/share. They don't install to for example ~/node. R should do the same: it should install packages to somewhere inside ~/.local by default.
2023 Mar 17
1
Request: better default R_LIBS_USER
On 16 March 2023 at 17:15, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: | We're all starting out with a fresh R_LIBS_USER once a year when a new | minor version of R is released, Maybe not "we all". I don't, and I know other Linux users who don't force a rebuild unless needed (as with R 3.6.* -> R 4.0.0). R signals clearly when a rebuild is needed at a major version change, and we had this
2017 Jul 03
1
/etc/R/Renviron doesn't set R_LIBS_USER anymore
On 2017-07-03 09:58, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 2 July 2017 at 23:24, Kirill M?ller wrote: > | On 02.07.2017 22:01, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > On 2 July 2017 at 21:39, Kirill M?ller wrote: > | > | Hi > | > | > | > | An upgrade to R 3.4.1 on Ubuntu removed the default setting of > | > | R_LIBS_USER in /etc/R/Renviron. What's the rationale behind this?
2020 Mar 19
0
R CMD check --as-cran attempts to hide R_LIBS_USER but fails
On 18 March 2020 at 19:19, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: | AFAIU, 'R CMD check --as-cran' tries to hide any site and user package | libraries by setting R_LIBS_SITE and R_LIBS_USER. However, contrary What makes you think that? AFAIK --as-cran just sets a bunch of the (nearly countless) environment variables (all described in R Inst+Admin, as I recall) to a set of values "close to"