Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "R_LIBS_USER bugs"
2010 Jan 04
1
bin/exec/R coredumps (PR#14177)
Full_Name: Jens Elkner
Version: 2.10.1
OS: Solaris
Submission from: (NULL) (87.188.113.172)
elkner.idev2 elkner/build/R-2.10.1 > bin/exec/R -e
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
elkner.idev2 elkner/build/R-2.10.1 > dbx bin/exec/R core
For information about new features see `help changes'
To remove this message, put `dbxenv suppress_startup_message 7.7' in your
.dbxrc
Reading R
core
2020 Mar 19
1
R CMD check --as-cran attempts to hide R_LIBS_USER but fails
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 8:04 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 18 March 2020 at 19:19, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> | AFAIU, 'R CMD check --as-cran' tries to hide any site and user package
> | libraries by setting R_LIBS_SITE and R_LIBS_USER. However, contrary
>
> What makes you think that? AFAIK --as-cran just sets a bunch of the (nearly
2020 Mar 19
2
R CMD check --as-cran attempts to hide R_LIBS_USER but fails
AFAIU, 'R CMD check --as-cran' tries to hide any site and user package
libraries by setting R_LIBS_SITE and R_LIBS_USER. However, contrary
to R_LIBS_SITE, it fails for R_LIBS_USER and the user's personal
library is still available for test scripts. Should I revise my
assumptions, or is that intentional?
The short version. Shouldn't:
$ R_LIBS_USER='' Rscript --vanilla -e
2017 Sep 16
1
R_LIBS_USER not in libPaths
I have not intentionally set R_LIBS_USER. I looked for an Renviron.site
file but did not see it in R/etc or my home directory. The strange part is
that if I print Sud.getenv I see a value for R_LIBS_USER. However, this
directory is not showing under libPaths.
I though .libPaths should contain R_LIBS_USER.
I also noticed that R related variables are not in the system or user
variables because I
2017 Sep 16
0
R_LIBS_USER not in libPaths
I'm not sure I follow what.the problem is. Are you trying to
set R_LIBS_USER but R does not acknowledge it, or do you observe something
in R that you didn't expect to be there and you are trying to figure out
why that is / where that happens?
Henrik
On Sep 16, 2017 07:10, "Rene J Suarez-Soto" <rene.j.suarez at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a computer where R_LIBS_USER is
2017 Jul 03
3
R_LIBS_USER on Ubuntu 16.04
Dear all,
the recent update to R-3.4.1 kind of screwed the path to the libraries
installed on a user basis.
The previous version of the file /etc/R/Renviron had the following line
activated:
R_LIBS_USER=${R_LIBS_USER-'~/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/3.4'}
This one is commented in the current one which means that the path to the
libraries installed previously is not found. I never
2017 Sep 16
4
R_LIBS_USER not in libPaths
I have a computer where R_LIBS_USER is not found in libPaths. This is for
Windows (x64). I ran R from the command line, RGui and RStudio and I get
the same results. I also ran R --vanilla and I still get the discrepancy.
The only thing I found interesting was that I also ran SET from the command
line and the "R related variables" (e.g., R_HOME; R_LIBS_USER) are not
there. Therefore
2013 Jun 12
1
Windows R_LIBS_USER confusion under R-3.0.1
I would appreciate ideas about MS Windows install issues. I'm at our stats
summer camp and have been looking at a lot of Windows R installs and there
are some wrinkles about R_LIBS_USER.
On a clean Win7 or Win8 system, with R-3.0.1, we see the user library for
packages defaulting to $HOME/R/win-library.
I think that's awesome, the way it should be. Yea! But it does not appear
that way
2014 Apr 01
1
Head's up: Renviron change in R_LIBS_USER to 3.1
Hi
Here's a warning for you. If you start R today and it can't find any
packages in your home directory that it did find yesterday, don't
faint. You'll see something like this:
> library(data.table)
Error in library(data.table) : there is no package called 'data.table'
and your user home folder R packages will no longer appear in path:
> .libPaths()
[1]
2023 Mar 17
1
Request: better default R_LIBS_USER
> Your best bet really to govern your .libPaths from your Rprofile.site and
Renviron.site ...
To do this for any version of R, one can add:
R_LIBS_USER=~/.local/share/R/%p-library/%v
to ~/.Renviron or the Renviron.site file. This automatically expands
to the platform and R x.y version early on when R starts up, e.g.
~/.local/share/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.2.
> rather than asking a
2009 Oct 27
0
help.start() only recognizes forward slashes in R_LIBS_USER which is not the default case
I've found that the HTML help system started via help.start() requires
all forward slashes in R_LIBS_USER otherwise the Packages page is
corrupt/non-working. Note that by default R_LIBS_USER is set by R on
startup.
Example 1:
With R_LIBS_USER=C:/Users/JohnDoe/R/win-library/2.10
> help.start() [and go to "Packages"]
If nothing happens, you should open
2017 Jul 02
2
/etc/R/Renviron doesn't set R_LIBS_USER anymore
Hi
An upgrade to R 3.4.1 on Ubuntu removed the default setting of
R_LIBS_USER in /etc/R/Renviron. What's the rationale behind this? Thanks.
Best regards
Kirill
2023 Mar 16
2
Request: better default R_LIBS_USER
On 16 March 2023 at 13:39, Felipe Contreras wrote:
| I see R by default installs packages in ~/R. I know I can change the
| default directory with R_LIBS_USER, but software shouldn't be
| polluting the home directory.
|
| For example both python and node install packages to ~/.local/lib,
| ruby to ~/.local/share. They don't install to for example ~/node.
|
| R should do the same: it
2008 Oct 16
1
attaching 2nd vol unsupported?
Hi,
im trying to attach another volume aka disk to win HVM, however it
doesn''t seem to work:
+ xm block-attach win2008ss phy:/dev/zvol/dsk/pool1/win2008ss.dsk2 \
hdd:disk w 0
results in:
elkner.sol ~ > + xm block-list win2008ss --long
(0
(vbd
(uuid 7cb8fadf-619d-dde6-bda9-dcc18023c7d5)
(bootable 1)
(devid 768)
(driver paravirtualised)
2010 Feb 20
2
R logo as SVG ?
Hi,
does anybody have the R logo in a vector format preferable SVG?
Need it for Freedesktop (GNOME desktop) integration of Rcmdr ...
Thanx,
jel.
--
Otto-von-Guericke University http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/
Department of Computer Science Geb. 29 R 027, Universitaetsplatz 2
39106 Magdeburg, Germany Tel: +49 391 67 12768
2017 Jul 02
3
/etc/R/Renviron doesn't set R_LIBS_USER anymore
On 02.07.2017 22:01, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 2 July 2017 at 21:39, Kirill M?ller wrote:
> | Hi
> |
> | An upgrade to R 3.4.1 on Ubuntu removed the default setting of
> | R_LIBS_USER in /etc/R/Renviron. What's the rationale behind this? Thanks.
>
> Pretty much exactly what I told you in person last week :)
>
> - idea is to prefer /usr/local/lib/R/site-library/
2023 Mar 16
1
Request: better default R_LIBS_USER
Hi,
I see R by default installs packages in ~/R. I know I can change the
default directory with R_LIBS_USER, but software shouldn't be
polluting the home directory.
For example both python and node install packages to ~/.local/lib,
ruby to ~/.local/share. They don't install to for example ~/node.
R should do the same: it should install packages to somewhere inside
~/.local by default.
2023 Mar 17
1
Request: better default R_LIBS_USER
On 16 March 2023 at 17:15, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
| We're all starting out with a fresh R_LIBS_USER once a year when a new
| minor version of R is released,
Maybe not "we all". I don't, and I know other Linux users who don't force a
rebuild unless needed (as with R 3.6.* -> R 4.0.0).
R signals clearly when a rebuild is needed at a major version change, and we
had this
2017 Jul 03
1
/etc/R/Renviron doesn't set R_LIBS_USER anymore
On 2017-07-03 09:58, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 2 July 2017 at 23:24, Kirill M?ller wrote:
> | On 02.07.2017 22:01, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > On 2 July 2017 at 21:39, Kirill M?ller wrote:
> | > | Hi
> | > |
> | > | An upgrade to R 3.4.1 on Ubuntu removed the default setting of
> | > | R_LIBS_USER in /etc/R/Renviron. What's the rationale behind this?
2020 Mar 19
0
R CMD check --as-cran attempts to hide R_LIBS_USER but fails
On 18 March 2020 at 19:19, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
| AFAIU, 'R CMD check --as-cran' tries to hide any site and user package
| libraries by setting R_LIBS_SITE and R_LIBS_USER. However, contrary
What makes you think that? AFAIK --as-cran just sets a bunch of the (nearly
countless) environment variables (all described in R Inst+Admin, as I recall)
to a set of values "close to"