similar to: R CMD INSTALL customization; followup on Dirk's question

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rebecca Gellman via samba wrote: > > > Hi, > > So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the > issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c: > > for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) { > NTSTATUS status; > > status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap, > NULL, /* local_addr */

I've been trying to do this for days, and I think I'm really close. It's become one of those so-close-yet-so-far sorts of things. I'm running Gentoo -- all sync'ed up and current as of a week ago -- with the following package versions: openldap-2.1.30-r5 pam_ldap-178-r1 nss_ldap-239-r1 smbldap-tools-0.9.1-r1 phpldapadmin-0.9.5 (very cool, I must say!) samba-3.0.14a-r2

Hi, So I did some digging into the source code, and I think I've found the issue. Around line 120 of source3/libads/cldap.c: for (i=0; i<num_servers; i++) { NTSTATUS status; status = cldap_socket_init(state->cldap, NULL, /* local_addr */ state->servers[i], &state->cldap[i]); if (tevent_req_nterror(req, status)) { return tevent_req_post(req, ev);

Hi, I've been using Samba for years as a domain controller without issue, but this has stumped me. I've set up Windows Vista Enterprise SP1 on a Virtual PC. Samba is running on a Gentoo Linux box as version 3.3.3. I can access shares without issue, but I can't get the machine to join the domain. When it tries it shows "The parameter is incorrect". Delving into

[ Kevin sent this to me but agreed that it's better to have this discussed here. ] On 30 January 2010 at 12:18, Kevin Donnelly wrote: | Hi | | I'm beginning to learn R,a nd I've just discovered cran2deb - what a terrific | resource! Thanks for making it. | | I was wondering what happens if I want to use cran2deb versions instead of the | versions installed via R itself. I'm

Some packages are available in cran2deb and Debian. After adding cran2deb to my sources.list it seems the cran2deb ones are favored because X.Y-ZcranN is "more recent" than X.Y-Z. In the case of r-cran-rmpi the effect of this was to cause aptitude to want to uninstall all my mpi stuff. Apparently the automatically generated package doesn't have mpi as a dependency. I just put a

On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 at 02:35, Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jos?, > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 11:20, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > > > I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. > > > > I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files

Is there somewhere a succinct guide to just how much extra crud we need to install on RHEL to make use of EPEL packages? [root at troll-1 noarch]# rpm -ivh R2spec-4.1.0-1.el6.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: fedora-packager is needed by R2spec-4.1.0-1.el6.noarch [root at troll-1 noarch]# wget http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/fedora-packager-0.5.9.4-1.el6.noarch.rpm

Hi Jos?, On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 11:20, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > I tried R2spec to create the spec files necessary to have Rcpparmadillo. > > I noticed that it has some issues, one example is that it placed some files > irrespectively if they were present in the tar or not. > I would like to update this, but I'd also like to grab Jason's

What is the relation between the cran2deb repository, http://debian.cran.r-project.org/, and the debian repositories at CRAN, http://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian/? I've studied the pages and this list, but am unsure I've got it right. My understanding is that cran2deb had almost all packages, targets testing, and currently is only supported for i386. It appears the debian repo at

Hi, I'm using Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 with cran2deb packages (I know it's meant for Debian, it's worked fine for me for many months). Recently apt-get update has to started to complain: ... Hit http://debian.cran.r-project.org testing/ Release Get:1 http://debian.cran.r-project.org testing/ Packages [515kB] Fetched 1B in 3s (0B/s) W: Failed to fetch

Dear list(s), Several people are actually really interested to package the CRAN or Bioconductor in RPM using R2spec. One of the features that R2spec should handle is the %file section of the spec file, to handle it I would like to be able to predict which files are installed while running the `R CMD INSTALL package_name` command from the tarball directly. I could always make R2spec compiling

Dear all, I try to install the latest R version using checkinstall (v. 1.6.2) on Ubuntu 11.10. After solving all the dependencies (installed using apt-get build-dep r-base) checkinstall fails to build and install R package with the following error (the same commands build and install R-2.13.2 on the same machine without any problem): wget

Announcing cran2deb: 1700+ Debian packages from almost all of CRAN ------------------------------------------------------------------ Last Friday's presentation at UseR! 2009 was the first really public mention of 'cran2deb'. It provides Debian packages of all of CRAN. It started as Charles' project from last year's Google Summer of Code, was further extended by us over the

Dear Michael, I was looking up the status of the cran2deb effort and notice that you now have a PPA where new packages are landing and being built for Ubuntu. It looks like this is still a work in progress, but is already a fantastic resource for me and I hope it is something that you can continue to operate. I'm now installing many of these packages but some things I need are missing.

Hi, I am curious what will happen to cran2deb: deb http://debian.cran.r-project.org/cran2deb/debian-amd64 testing/ When Squeeze is released? I really hope this service will continue. It has been great being able to aptitude install R packages. Additionally are these packages signed and is there a key? Chris

I think I've found a bug in the LDAP stuff. I've got a LDAP backend setup based on the idealx scripts. When I try to join a machine to my domain, I get the following. The important bit I want to point out is that the LDAP search is looking for (a lot of) properties, but it seems to be looking for _ALL_ objectClass=sambaSamAccount's. At this point in the trace, it should be trying to

Dear all Recently I noticed that there are name clashes between the packages proposed in the Debian testing repos and cran2deb. For example, Synaptic proposes to upgrade from xtable 1.5-6-1cran1 (cran2deb, up-to-date CRAN version) to 1.5.5-1 (testing, older version). Is there anything that can be done about these clashes? Liviu -- Do you know how to read?

I am reviewing some work that I did in June and forgot to take notes at the time. For some reason I have a nagging suspicion that for this job I used a package builder other than checkinstall but for the life of me I cannot recall the name. Now, the case may be that I actually did use checkinstall in which case not remembering the name of non-extant software is expected. On the other hand I

[ Kevin sent this to me but agreed that it's better to have this discussed here. ] On 30 January 2010 at 11:35, Kevin Donnelly wrote: | I am using Ubuntu 9.10. Installing r-cran-latticist asks for r-cran-vr to | be installed as well, but this gives the following message: | E: /var/cache/apt/archives/r-cran-vr_7.2.47-1_i386.deb: trying to overwrite |