similar to: Creating RPMs for Packages

I have a case where the easiest way to draw a particular symbol would be to draw something a little bigger, and then use polygon(... , col=0) to erase the extra stuff. Just how to do this best when par('bg') = 'transparent' is, however, eluding me. I've looked through the archives and the book R Graphics without quite seeing the light. Help or pointers to help would be

hello, if i load the RSQLite package in addition to the RPostgreSQL package, i get various errors when trying to use RPostgreSQL functions. here is an example transcript showing one such error: ========================================================== R version 2.15.0 (2012-03-30) [...] > packageVersion('RPostgreSQL') [1] 0.3.2 > packageVersion('RSQLite') [1] 0.11.1

Working on the caret package has exposed me to the wide variety of approaches that different authors have taken to creating predictive modeling functions (aka machine learning)(aka pattern recognition). I suspect that many package authors are neophyte R users and are stumbling through the process of writing their first R package (or R code). As such, they may not have been exposed to some of the

On 02/12/2018 12:52 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > >> can we reach agreement on whether vsock should be involved in this? > > I think the best approach would be to have guest proxy and host proxy > use vsock for the wayland protocol. Use a wayland protocol extension to > reference the buffers in stdvga / ivshmem / virtio-gpu. Only the two > proxies need to

On 02/12/2018 12:52 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > >> can we reach agreement on whether vsock should be involved in this? > > I think the best approach would be to have guest proxy and host proxy > use vsock for the wayland protocol. Use a wayland protocol extension to > reference the buffers in stdvga / ivshmem / virtio-gpu. Only the two > proxies need to

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 14:19:56 -0700 > Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com> wrote: > >> When using -fPIE/PIC with function tracing, the compiler generates a >> call through the GOT (call *__fentry__ at GOTPCREL). This instruction >> takes 6 bytes instead of 5 on the usual

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 14:19:56 -0700 > Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com> wrote: > >> When using -fPIE/PIC with function tracing, the compiler generates a >> call through the GOT (call *__fentry__ at GOTPCREL). This instruction >> takes 6 bytes instead of 5 on the usual

The utils package has a misc folder, and some other packages have folders that are not listed in the R-extensions documentation (?data?, ? demo?, ?exec?, ?inst?, ?man?, ?po?, ?src?, and ?tests?). I'd like to be able to put some ancillary data into a misc folder, but it's mere presence in the source folder or source tarball (created with R CMD build) does not mean that it gets put into

Hello all, Tomas Bonnedahl and I recently corresponded about a rather odd behaviour with routes in ancillary routing tables. We both receive a "Network is unreachable" error when we try to add gatewayed routes to ancillary tables and the main routing table does not contain an entry for the gateway IP. It seems that unless a route to the gateway IP exists in the main routing table, I

CentOS 6.9 has support for the Haswell processor which is a subset of the Skylake. All Skylake server ancillary components work perfectly with CentOS 6.9. The AST2500 used with the Skylake is very good and will process UHD. However this is not backwards compatible with legacy variants. To make it work an ancillary graphics card is required which is less than $100. This will not break the

On 02/12/2018 03:27 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:00:24PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On 02/12/2018 12:52 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>>> can we reach agreement on whether vsock should be involved in this? >>> >>> I think the best approach would be to have guest proxy and host proxy >>> use

Hi, I am curious what will happen to cran2deb: deb http://debian.cran.r-project.org/cran2deb/debian-amd64 testing/ When Squeeze is released? I really hope this service will continue. It has been great being able to aptitude install R packages. Additionally are these packages signed and is there a key? Chris

Hi, I'm using Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 with cran2deb packages (I know it's meant for Debian, it's worked fine for me for many months). Recently apt-get update has to started to complain: ... Hit http://debian.cran.r-project.org testing/ Release Get:1 http://debian.cran.r-project.org testing/ Packages [515kB] Fetched 1B in 3s (0B/s) W: Failed to fetch

Dear Michael, I was looking up the status of the cran2deb effort and notice that you now have a PPA where new packages are landing and being built for Ubuntu. It looks like this is still a work in progress, but is already a fantastic resource for me and I hope it is something that you can continue to operate. I'm now installing many of these packages but some things I need are missing.

Hi, I am tracking down a problem and would like to know how I can follow a forked process with my dtrace script, or how I can trace a dynamic library. Here is the problem. I am tracing dtlogin, and specifically I am trying to determine what error libpkcs11`<routine> is returning. It turns out dtlogin forks a lot of processes, and I believe the second forked process is the one that winds

Some packages are available in cran2deb and Debian. After adding cran2deb to my sources.list it seems the cran2deb ones are favored because X.Y-ZcranN is "more recent" than X.Y-Z. In the case of r-cran-rmpi the effect of this was to cause aptitude to want to uninstall all my mpi stuff. Apparently the automatically generated package doesn't have mpi as a dependency. I just put a

Announcing cran2deb: 1700+ Debian packages from almost all of CRAN ------------------------------------------------------------------ Last Friday's presentation at UseR! 2009 was the first really public mention of 'cran2deb'. It provides Debian packages of all of CRAN. It started as Charles' project from last year's Google Summer of Code, was further extended by us over the

Dear All, I am running (X)Ubuntu 9.10 for the amd64 architecture on both my laptop e desktop. I came across the posts http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1336062 http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-debian at r-project.org/msg00892.html So it looks like that I will not be able to safely use cran2deb together with Ubuntu, but I simply would like to make sure that this is the way things

I have an environment consisting of: * Primary Workstation running Win2KPro * Secondary Workstation runing WinNTSP6a * Local Win2K Advanced Server * Local Solaris 8 system with Samba 2.0.7 * Remote HP-UX system at Site A with Samba 1.9.18p10 connected via VPN * Remote Unixware system at Site B with Vison(?) file sharing connected via VPN * Three remote Win2K server boxes at Site C connected via

What is the relation between the cran2deb repository, http://debian.cran.r-project.org/, and the debian repositories at CRAN, http://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian/? I've studied the pages and this list, but am unsure I've got it right. My understanding is that cran2deb had almost all packages, targets testing, and currently is only supported for i386. It appears the debian repo at