similar to: lapack problem on Linux fedora 11

I ran into a problem trying to make a plot from a file that's read using source. Basically, I have the following code in a file "plot.R" : library(nlme) data(Loblolly) fm1 <- nlme(height ~ SSasymp(age, Asym, R0, lrc), data = Loblolly, fixed = Asym + R0 + lrc ~ 1, random = Asym ~ 1, start = c(Asym = 103, R0 = -8.5, lrc = -3.3))

Hola a todos Les consulto por un problema con xtable y nlme, tomando un ejemplo del manual de nlme para obtener los resultados en latex utilizando xtable, se puede utilizar el siguiente código, pero hay un problema y causa error. library(nlme) library(xtable) fm1 <- nlme(height ~ SSasymp(age, Asym, R0, lrc), data = Loblolly, fixed = Asym + R0 + lrc ~ 1,

Am Dienstag, 25. April 2017, 11:21:31 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: > On 25 April 2017 at 16:11, Johannes Ranke wrote: > | This looks similar to what I got this morning when I tested my > | (unreleased) > | backport of R 3.4.0 to Debian jessie. My test was > | > | library(MASS) > | example(rlm) > | > | and there was an object that was not found. I am on a train on the way

Hello all. I have been working on a (fairly simple) function for way too long. I’ve really hit a wall and I was hoping someone might be able to point me in the right direction. I have (attempted) to create a function that has an embedded while loop. The while loop works fine by itself, however, when the while loop is embedded in the function, the function fails. I’m not sure why this

Hi All. I'm trying to run nlsList an getting an error that makes no sense to me. I have accuracy and reaction time data over many trials for each person (id) When I use nlsList code that is virtually identical to the example in the doc file I get the following error. I've tried everything I could think of and can't get around it. Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? **************

Better posted on r-sig-mixed-models , no? Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:17 AM, PIKAL Petr <petr.pikal at precheza.cz> wrote: > Dear all > > I encountered strange

Dear all I encountered strange behaviour of augPred with virtually the same data First I made groupedData object. > mar.g<-groupedData(rutilizace~doba|int, data=mar) When I perform nlme on complete dataset I get an error with augPred > fit<-nlsList(rutilizace~SSasymp(doba, Asym, R0, lrc), data=mar.g) Warning message: c("1 error caught in nls(y ~ cbind(1 - exp(-exp(lrc) * x),

> On Aug 23, 2017, at 8:08 AM, PIKAL Petr <petr.pikal at precheza.cz> wrote: > > Hi > > Well, yes I tried it about two weeks ago but my post did not get through as it still awaits moderator approval. It got through just fine. It appeared on Aug 15. It just didn't get any replies. As I read your original question in this thread, it was not clear to me that you had

Dear Rusers, How would I plot several (24) fitted curves (nonlinear least squares) within a single plot? To get the parameters I use: resff <- list() for (s in levels(PairID)) { resff[[s]] <- nls(Photo ~ SSasymp(Ci, Asym, lrc, c0), subset = (PairID == s)) } Is it also possible to plot two different groups (male, female) of curves in the same plot, with different style lines?

Hi Well, yes I tried it about two weeks ago but my post did not get through as it still awaits moderator approval. I could check which column is offending but actually it is only minor nuisance, I can live with selection of columns before fitting a model. What seems to me strange is that both full dataset and only selected colums gave me identical fit results but only one works within augPred.

Hi I would like to fit a non-linear regression to the follwoing data: quantiles<-c(seq(.05,.95,0.05)) slopes<-c( 0.000000e+00, 1.622074e-04 , 3.103918e-03 , 2.169135e-03 , 9.585523e-04 ,1.412327e-03 , 4.288103e-05, -1.351171e-04 , 2.885810e-04 ,-4.574773e-04 , -2.368968e-03, -3.104634e-03, -5.833970e-03, -6.011945e-03, -7.737697e-03 , -8.203058e-03, -7.809603e-03, -6.623985e-03,

Dear forum members, What is the formula to calculate denominator degrees of freedom (den df) for nonlinear mixed-effect models with covariates? My model is similar to a CO2 uptake example from Pinheiro and Bates (2000, page 376). In this CO2 dataset, there are two treatments and two types (84 observations in total), but den df for each parameter of the model is 64. Isn’t it too high? Your

Hello: I am new on R, this is the first time I work with it, I am trying to run some R example to get learn of them, but, I have a problem when running the example below: http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/datasets/html/zCO2.html CO2.Qn1 <- CO2[CO2$Plant == "Qn1", ] SSasympOff(CO2.Qn1$conc, 32, -4, 43) # response only Asym <- 32; lrc <- -4; c0 <- 43

I am having trouble fitting correlation structures within nlme. I would like to fit corCAR1, corGaus and corExp correlation structures to my data. I either get the error "step halving reduced below minimum in pnls step" or alternatively R crashes. My dataset is similar to the CO2 example in the nlme package. The one major difference is that in my case the 'conc' steps are

Full_Name: Madeleine Yeh Version: 1.9.1 OS: AIX 5.2 Submission from: (NULL) (151.121.225.1) After compiling R-1.9.1 on AIX 5.2 using the IBM cc compiler, I ran the checks. One of them failed. Here is the output from running the check solo. root@svweb:/fsapps/test/build/R/1.9.1/R-1.9.1/tests/Examples: ># ../../bin/R --vanilla < stats-Ex.R R : Copyright 2004, The R

Hello, How do I specify the formula and random effects without a startup object ? I thought it would be a mixture of nls and lme. after trying very hard, I ask for help on using nlme. Can someone hint me to some examples? I constructed a try using the example from nls: #variables are density, conc and Run #all works fine with nls DNase1 <- subset(DNase, Run == 1 ) fm2DNase1 <- nls(

SSweibull() :  problems with step factor and singular gradient Hello I am working with growth data of ~4000 tree seedlings and trying to fit non-linear Weibull growth curves through the data of each plant. Since they differ a lot in their shape, initial parameters cannot be set for all plants. That’s why I use the self-starting function SSweibull(). However, I often got two error messages:

I am wondering how to obtain SE estimates for fixed effects from a nonlinear mixed effects model? I have fixed effects corresponding to three factors A, B and C with 2, 3 and 3 levels respectively. I have fit a model of the following general form: nlme1<-nlme(y~ SasympOrig(x, Asym, lrc), data=df, fixed=list(Asym~A*B*C, lrc~A*B*C), start=c(fixef(ETR.nlme)[1], rep(0,17), fixef(ETR.nlme)[2],

Hi, I have a program written in R which is good on the version 1.2, but for the fallowing versions of R, an error always is at the same place. That is at the level of the fallowing line: Sur<- getInitial(res2[m:M,2]~SSasymp(res2[m:M,1],Asymp,resp0,lrc),data=res2) Error in eval(expr,envir,enclos):numeric envir arg not of length one I don't know at all this langage for the instant.

Hi folks, I tried to retain the Weibull distribution using the `nls' function and proceeding along the lines of the example provided in the `SSweibull' help (at least I thought so): t <- (1:200)/100 v <- pweibull(t, shape=3, scale=1) df <- data.frame(Time=t, Value=v) Asym <- 1.0; Drop <- 1.0; lrc <- 0; pwr <- 1 df.estimate <- nls(Value ~ SSweibull(Time,