similar to: as.Date function yields inconsistent results (PR#14166)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "as.Date function yields inconsistent results (PR#14166)"

2009 Dec 20
2
as.Date question
All! This piece of code: zzz1 <- as.POSIXct("1999-03-18", tz="CET") zzz2 <- as.POSIXlt("1999-03-18", tz="CET") zzz1 == zzz2 as.Date(zzz1) as.Date(zzz2) yields TRUE for "zzz1==zzz2", but the two dates returned by as.Date are different: > as.Date(zzz1) [1] "1999-03-17" > as.Date(zzz2) [1] "1999-03-18" I'm
2004 Aug 17
3
Fwd: strptime() problem?
Hi all; I've already send a similar e-mail to the list and Prof. Brian Ripley answered me but my doubts remain unresolved. Thanks for the clarification, but perhaps I wasn't clear enough in posting my questions. I've got a postgres database which I read into R. The first column is Timestamp with timezone, and my data are already in UTC format. An 'printed' extract of R
2008 Feb 16
3
Arithmetic bug? (found when use POSIXct) (PR#10776)
Full_Name: Bo Zhou Version: 2.6.1 (2007-11-26) OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (207.237.54.242) Hi, I found an arithmetic problem when I'm doing something with POSIXct The code to reproduce it is as follows (This is the recommended way of finding out time zone difference on R News 2004-1 Page 32 URL http://cran.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/Rnews_2004-1.pdf) a=Sys.time()
2019 Jun 28
2
Re: Guestfish command - "copy-out" not working for symbolic links
guestfish --ro -a /path/to/disk run : mount /dev/your-blkdev / : download /etc/resolv.conf /path/on/host/dst.file -- +380979184774 Mykola Ivanets пт, 28 черв. 2019 о 21:29 Nikolay Ivanets <stenavin@gmail.com> пише: > > All API is exposed as gustfish commands > > -- > Mykola Ivanets > > пт, 28 черв. 2019, 21:28 користувач Chintan Patel
2007 Apr 04
1
time zone problems
Folks, I'm having trouble with how datetime objects with time zones are set and plotted. This may be the result of my running R (2.4.0) on a Windoze XP box. Perhaps not. Here are two example problems I need advise on if you have time: 1) I collect data with dates (often as a fractional day of year) in UTC. Using strptime to create date time objects appears to force the data into
2020 Oct 01
3
timezone tests and R-devel
The return value of Sys.time() today with a timezone of US/Eastern is unchanged between 4.0.3-patched and devel, but on devel the following test fails all.equal(x, as.POSIXlt(x)) with x = Sys.time() This means that devel does not complete make tests (failure on tests/reg-tests-2.R) It is entirely possible that it is an error on my end, I use export TZ="US/Eastern" but I have been
2020 Oct 02
2
timezone tests and R-devel
Yes, the potential issue I see is that make check fails when I explicitly set TZ. However, I set it to be the same as what the system reports when I login. Details: The system (RHEL) I am working on has $ strings /etc/localtime | tail -n 1 EST5EDT,M3.2.0,M11.1.0 $ date +%Z EDT $ echo $TZ US/Eastern On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 9:48 AM Sebastian Meyer <seb.meyer at fau.de> wrote: > Thank
2017 Oct 18
2
Another issue with Sys.timezone
>>>>> Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> >>>>> on Mon, 16 Oct 2017 19:13:31 +0200 writes: >>>>> Stephen Berman <stephen.berman at gmx.net> >>>>> on Sun, 15 Oct 2017 01:53:12 +0200 writes: > > (I reported the test failure mentioned below to R-help but was advised > > that this list is
2020 Oct 23
2
The presence/absence of `zone` in POSIXlt depending on time zone as a cause of possible inconsistences?
Dear all, I have just detected what seems a minor inconsistence with data types. If one unlists a POSIXlt time with GMT zone gets a numeric vector, since the POSIXlt list has no `zone` element, while if one unlists a POSIXlt time with a non GMT zone (also non specifying tz if the Sys.timezone is not GMT) gets a character vector due to including the `zone` element. > x <-
2017 May 17
2
R-3.4.0 fails test
After installing R-3.4.0 I ran 'make check' which halted here: $ > tail reg-tests-1d.Rout.fail -n 16 > ## format()ing invalid hand-constructed POSIXlt objects > d <- as.POSIXlt("2016-12-06"); d$zone <- 1 > tools::assertError(format(d)) > d$zone <- NULL > stopifnot(identical(format(d),"2016-12-06")) > d$zone <- "CET" # =
2017 May 17
2
R-3.4.0 fails test
After installing R-3.4.0 I ran 'make check' which halted here: $ > tail reg-tests-1d.Rout.fail -n 16 > ## format()ing invalid hand-constructed POSIXlt objects > d <- as.POSIXlt("2016-12-06"); d$zone <- 1 > tools::assertError(format(d)) > d$zone <- NULL > stopifnot(identical(format(d),"2016-12-06")) > d$zone <- "CET" # =
2017 Oct 14
2
Another issue with Sys.timezone
(I reported the test failure mentioned below to R-help but was advised that this list is the right one to address the issue; in the meantime I investigated the matter somewhat more closely, including searching recent R-devel postings, since I haven't been following this list.) Last May there were two reports here of problems with Sys.timezone, one where the zoneinfo directory is in a
2017 May 18
2
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
This has to do with your own timezone. If I run that code on my computer, both formats are correct. If I do this after Sys.setenv(TZ = "UTC") Then: > cbind(format(dlt), format(dct)) [,1] [,2] [1,] "2016-12-06 21:45:41" "2016-12-06 20:45:41" [2,] "2016-12-06 21:45:42" "2016-12-06 20:45:42" The reason for that, is that
2015 Dec 07
2
inconsistency in POSIXlt
The documentation for the POSIXlt class states '"POSIXlt" objects will often have an attribute "tzone", a character vector of length 3 giving the time zone name from the TZ environment variable and the names of the base time zone and the alternate (daylight-saving) time zone. Sometimes this may just be of length one, giving the time zone
2013 Aug 22
1
From POSIXct to numeric and back with time zone
From POSIXct to numeric and back with time zone I am running regressions on data which has time series with different time resolution. Some data has hourly resolution, while most has either daily or weekly resolution. Aggregation is used to make the hourly data daily, while liner interpolation is used to find daily data from the weekly time series. This data manipulation requires some careful
2017 May 18
2
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
> On 18 May 2017, at 13:47 , Joris Meys <jorismeys at gmail.com> wrote: > > Correction: Also dlt uses the default timezone, but POSIXlt is not recalculated whereas POSIXct is. Reason for that is the different way values are stored (hours, minutes, seconds as opposed to minutes from origin, as explained in my previous mail) > I would suspect that there is something more subtle
2020 Apr 24
4
Timezone conversion on Ubuntu 20.04
Hi all, I am testing R 4.0 and ran into an issue with timezones on Ubuntu Focal: converting a timestamp to another timezone results in NA: as.POSIXct(as.POSIXlt(Sys.time(), tz = "CET"), tz = "EST") This only happens on Ubuntu Focal, it seems to work fine on Ubuntu Bionic. I am the standard ubuntu docker image icw/ r-base from Dirk's ppa:edd/r-4.0 on both systems. Am I
2017 May 18
2
[R] R-3.4.0 fails test
On Wed, 17-May-2017 at 01:21PM +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: |> |> Anyways, you might want to |> |> a) move the discussion to R-devel |> b) include your platform (hardware, OS) and time zone info System: Host: MTA-V1-427894 Kernel: 3.19.0-32-generic x86_64 (64 bit gcc: 4.8.2) Desktop: KDE Plasma 4.14.2 (Qt 4.8.6) Distro: Linux Mint 17.3 Rosa Machine: System:
2013 Feb 01
2
difftime() out by 1 hour
I have a problem with results from difftime being 1 hour different than expected. 2 examples are given below: datetime <- matrix(data=rbind(c("2012-03-31 21:00:00", "2012-04-01 00:00:00", "2012-04-01 03:00:00", "2012-04-01 06:00:00"), c("2012-10-06 21:00:00", "2012-10-07 00:00:00", "2012-10-07 03:00:00",
2009 Mar 04
2
patch for axis.POSIXct (related to timezones)
I am finding that axis.POSIXct uses the local timezone for deciding where to put tic marks, even if the data being plotted are in another time zone. The solution is to use attr() to copy from the 'x' (provided as an argument) to the 'z' (used for the 'at' locations). I have pasted my proposed solution in section 1 below (as a diff). Then, in section 2, I'll put some