Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Segfault reporting: memory not mapped error"
2015 Oct 29
2
R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch
Hi,
Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I
didn't get an error so didn't think about the consequences... One
consequence is (at least on Mac OS X 10.11 but probably in more
generality) that R_BATCH_OPTIONS are ignored, which was kind of fatal
in my case... I am thus wondering whether it makes sense to either a)
have R_BATCH_OPTIONS also
2015 Oct 29
2
R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch
Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> writes:
> On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote:
> | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I
> | didn't get an error so didn't think about the consequences... One
> | consequence is (at least on Mac OS X 10.11 but probably in more
> | generality) that R_BATCH_OPTIONS are
2007 Jun 14
1
LAPACK Headers
Hey Everyone,
I'm running R 2.4.0 on Debian etch 4.0, and I'm trying to call some
LAPACK functions from the C code in my package. Actually, to be
honest I'm not really having trouble using commands such as La_dgesv
from within my C code, but I do get warning when compiling the package
saying:
***.c: In function '***':
***.c:37: warning: implicit declaration of function
2009 Jun 28
1
ERROR: system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number = 4.90109e-18
Hi All,
This is my R-version information:---
> version
_
platform i486-pc-linux-gnu
arch i486
os linux-gnu
system i486, linux-gnu
status
major 2
minor 7.1
year 2008
month 06
day 23
svn rev 45970
language R
version.string R version 2.7.1 (2008-06-23)
While calculating partial
2006 Dec 11
2
FW: R
Hi Ricky / AJ
Progress of sorts. I got passed the last problem by looking at the makefiles
but run in to the next one, see below.
It has created files in /contrib/R-2.4.0. there is an " R " under
/contrib/R-2.4.0/bin/R.
Running it gives :-
/contrib/R-2.4.0/bin/R
R version 2.4.0 (2006-10-03)
Copyright (C) 2006 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
ISBN 3-900051-07-0
R is
2006 Jul 05
1
problem with batch mode (PR#9062)
I have a perl script that constructs some large R script files and
runs R in batch mode with the R scripts. It seems to work ok for a
while then starts throwing errors like this whenever I try to run R
in batch mode:
/usr/lib64/R/bin/BATCH: line 52: 7875 Broken pipe ( echo
"invisible(options(echo = TRUE))"; cat ${in}; echo ''; echo "proc.time
()"
2015 Oct 29
0
R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch
Great, thanks, Dirk. Nice example :-)
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
>
> On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote:
> | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I
> | didn't get an error so didn't think about the consequences... One
> | consequence is (at least on
2015 Oct 29
0
R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Rainer M Krug <Rainer at krugs.de> wrote:
> Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> writes:
>
>> On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote:
>> | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I
>> | didn't get an error so didn't think about the consequences... One
>> |
2007 Apr 24
1
Values greater than 1 or lower than -1 in ARMAacf
Dear all,
I need to compute the ACF (autocorrel) of an AR6 process, given the values
of its parameters (w1,w2,w3,w4,w5,w6).
First, I notice that there is an error as soon as the sum of the wi equals 1
:
"Error in drop(.Call("La_dgesv", a, as.matrix(b), tol, PACKAGE = "base")) :
system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number =
1.00757e-18"
2008 Apr 08
1
error using method ls.ranking.capa.ident
I'm trying to run the generalized least square approach for my 2-additive
problem,
unfortunately this error appeared. I have tried to figure out the error from
the mailing list
but couldn't find the solution. Any help is highly appreciated.
This is my source code:
>a1 <- c(76.18, 61.84, 60.4, 69.09)
> a2 <- c(51.01, 50.39, 87.62, 52.03)
> a3 <- c(80.08, 48.49, 90.86,
2012 Jan 10
1
Lapack routine dgesv: system is exactly singular
Hi
I have a problem with this error, I have searched the archives and found
previous discussion about this, can I cannot understand how the explanations
apply to what I am trying to do.
I am trying to do Log_rank Survival analysis, I have included tables and str
command, is it a factor/integer problem? If so how do I correct this, as all
my attempt to recode the data have failed.
>
2009 Jun 25
2
crr - computationally singular
Dear R-help,
I'm very sorry to ask 2 questions in a week. I am using the package
'crr' and it does exactly what I need it to when I use the dataset a.
However, when I use dataset b I get the following error message:
Error in drop(.Call("La_dgesv", a, as.matrix(b), tol, PACKAGE = "base")) :
system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number =
2009 Jul 14
1
LAPACK package
Hi All,
Can someone tell me if solve function shown below for my version of R is
proper or not?
I am using R 2.7.2 .Wherever i have used this function ,i got results which
were different from the expected results as computed using SPSS.
Description of this function says:--
Solve a System of EquationsDescription
This generic function solves the equation a %*% x = b for x, where b can be
either
2015 Oct 29
2
R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch
Deepayan Sarkar <deepayan.sarkar at gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Rainer M Krug <Rainer at krugs.de> wrote:
>> Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> writes:
>>
>>> On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote:
>>> | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I
>>> |
2009 Jun 25
2
Error: system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number
I get this error while computing partial correlation.
*Error in solve.default(Szz) :
system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number =
4.90109e-18*
Why is it?Can anyone give me some idea ,how do i get rid it it?
This is the function i use for calculating partial correlation.
pcor.mat <- function(x,y,z,method="p",na.rm=T){
x <- c(x)
y <- c(y)
2016 Feb 26
8
[PATCH 0/4] fix pmu code on gk208+
while trying out my pmu_counter patches on a gk208 gpu, I notived that the pmu
is pretty much screwed up there.
Karol Herbst (4):
pmu/fuc: fix imm32 for gk208+
pmu/fuc: replace mov+sethi with imm32
pmu/fuc: call# seems to be broken on gk208
pmu/fuc: movw is somewhat weird on gk208, use mov instead
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/gf100.fuc3.h | 1598 +++++++++++------------
2010 Nov 18
0
Mixed multinomial logit model (mlogit script)
Dear all,
I am trying to run a mixed multinomial logit model in R since my response variable has 4 non-ordinal categories. I am using the package mlogit that estimates the parameters by maximum likelihood methods. First of all, I prepared my data using the mlogit.data command. In the mlogit command, one can introduce alternative-specific (fixed factors??) and individual-specific (random
2006 Oct 24
0
problem compilation on AIX
I'm trying to install R-2.4.0 on AIX 5.2. But, I have an error message
during the compilation.
Can you help me please?
I have used :
export OBJECT_MODE=64
export CC=/usr/bin/xlc_r
export F77=/usr/bin/xlf_r
export CXX=/usr/bin/xlC_r
export LDFLAGS='-brtl'
export CFLAGS='-O2 -qstrict'
export FFLAGS='-O2 -qstrict'
export CXXFLAGS='-O2 -qstrict'
./configure
2005 Oct 19
1
ipop (kernlab) gives pars < lower bound ?
hi everyone,
ipop very quickly and accurately identifies the correct parameters in
a toy dataset i built, but when i use ipop on the real dataset i get
values for the parameters " primal(res) " that are less than zero,
even though i specify zero for the lower bound : l = rep(0,
length(c)) , where length(c) is the number of parameters i'm trying to
identify.
the parameters are
2006 Nov 15
0
segfault in AIX
I'm trying to build R 2.4.0 on an IBM P5-570 that's running
AIX 5.3. I'm using xlc 7.0, xlc++ 7.0 and xlf 9.1 in 32 bit
mode (OBJECT_MODE is 32 in the build environment).
The source is the patched version of 2.4.0, downloaded yesterday.
Configure options were --prefix, --srcdir, --x-includes, --x-libraries,
and --without-readline. Compiler flags were -O2.
The make step fails with