similar to: Possible bug in the Rd parser?

Hi all; I recently have been used 'maxLik' function for maximizing G2StNV178 function with gradient function gradlik; for receiving this goal, I write the following program; but I have been seen an error  in calling gradient  function; The maxLik function can't enter gradlik function (definition of gradient function); I guess my mistake is in line ******** ,that the vector  ‘h’ is

I'm currently working on writing up some documentation for some of my code, but am having the darndest time coding in equations. For example, the equation in the following: \details{ Calculated the R Squared for observed endogenous variables in a structural equation model, as well as several other useful summary statistics about the error in thoe variables. R Squared values are

The document R-exts contains the following example of using mathematics in R documentation. \deqn{p(x) = {\lambda^x\ \frac{e^{-\lambda}}{x!}} {p(x) = lambda^x exp(-lambda)/x!} There is a syntax error in there, but that's not my point. The problem is that using "R CMD Rd2dvi" I find that putting the alternate forms of the equation on top of each other doesn't work.

I am using 32-bit R 3.1.2 on Windows 7. I recently conducted an `R CMD check --as-cran` on a recently-developed package and received only the 'New submission' note. Research on StackOverflow and on R-devel suggested this could be ignored. I also used devtools::build_win() and received no notes or warnings, other than the one mentioned previously. Lastly, I conducted an `R CMD check` with

the version 2 parser thinks I have unnecessary braces, but I can't find any. False positive or am I missing something? If a false positive, is there any way to work around the warning? * checking Rd files against version 2 parser ... WARNING Warning: ./man/dbetabinom.Rd:32-34: Unnecessary braces at ?{p(x) = % (C(N,x)*Beta(N-x+theta*(1-p),x+theta*p))/% Beta(theta*(1-p),theta*p)}?

I've just committed the parse_Rd() function to R-devel. This is a parser for Rd files, described in http://developer.r-project.org/parseRd.pdf It is not identical to the current parser, and about a dozen of the base man pages currently signal syntax errors. It also detected errors in 10 files that were errors according to both definitions, but were missed by the current system, and

Dear All, I am starting to use the tikzDevice package, but I am experiencing some (minor problems). If I try to run the script at the end of the email, I get the following error Error in tools::texi2dvi("normal.tex", pdf = T) : Running 'texi2dvi' on 'normal.tex' failed. Messages: sh: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: not found How do I install the missing texi2dvi? I found some

Hi, This is a problem about writing R documentation (R-exts 2.6). The command "\deqn" defined in "Rd.sty" is: \newcommand{\deqn}[2]{\[#1\]} which will put mathematical formulae in the "displaymath" environment; that means line breaks are not allowed (or will not be shown) in formulae, but sometimes we do need multiple lines of formulae. One solution is to write

Hi All, After some tinkering, and with support from Duncan, I put together a package that allows for easy inclusion of MathJax equations in Rd files. The package has been submitted to CRAN, but those who want to try this out already can get it here: https://github.com/wviechtb/mathjaxr or in other words: install.packages("remotes")

Hi All, I am reading through section 2.6 (Mathematics) of the "Writing R Extensions" manuscript and am wondering where I can find more examples/documentation on the \deqn{ } function. I would like to learn how to display equations using this function but am not sure how to go about doing it. The one example provided in section 2.6 doesn't give me much of a sense on how to do this.

Dear all, Now that R has OpenMP facilities, I'm trying to use it for my own package but I'm still wondering if it is safe to use random number generation within a OpenMP block. I looked at the R writing extension document both on the OpenMP and Random number generation but didn't find any information about that. Could someone tell me if it is safe or not please ? Best, Mathieu

Dear list, There is, I believe, a minor typo in the example section of influence.measures.Rd. In the final example the word `does` appears where I suspect `dose` is required: I couldn't remember exactly what format patches should be in, so here is one as diff would produce: Index: devel/src/library/stats/man/influence.measures.Rd

This is adapted from partha_bagchi@hgsi.com 's report on R-help: plot(0); title(expression("Bad\n with much much more text"))) gives something like Bad with much much more text (``newline w/o carriage return'') instead of centering both lines such as Bad with much much more text which is produced by (just dropping

I better report this before I forget again (I think it may also be a problem with \item) : >Paul Gilbert wrote: >> > \section{Model Parameters}{ >> >> I seem to recall having a bit of trouble with this quietly omitting things when the >> last "{" had a space before it or was on a new line. I'm not sure if that >>is still a problem (or if indeed

Dear R-Users I have the following matrix > out$desc [,1] [,2] [1,] "" "" [2,] "y_{01}(k-001)" "" [3,] "y_{01}(k-002)" "" [4,] "y_{01}(k-003)" "" [5,] "u_{01}(k-001)" "" [6,] "u_{01}(k-002)" "" [7,] "u_{01}(k-003)" ""

Hello, I would like to implement the feature request described here: https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13287. I think this is a very worthwhile feature. However, I need just a little push in the right direction. When I added either a new command or change the old one to use eqnarray as proposed, the "\\" newline characters were not properly passed to latex - even

Hi all, I am using R, Version 1.9.1 alpha (2004-05-25), ISBN 3-900051-00-3 on SunOS fluke 5.9 Generic_117171-02 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-480R Version: sparc-sun-solaris2.9 arch = sparc os = solaris2.9 system = sparc, solaris2.9 status = alpha major = 1 minor = 9.1 year = 2004 month = 05 day = 25 language = R Search Path: .GlobalEnv, package:methods, package:stats, package:graphics,

Ok I made Jarque-Bera test to the residuals (merv.reg$residual) library(tseries) jarque.bera.test(merv.reg$residual) X-squared = 1772.369, df = 2, p-value = < 2.2e-16 And I reject the null hypotesis (H0: merv.reg$residual are normally distributed) So I know that: 1 - merv.reg$residual aren't independently distributed (Box-Ljung test) 2 - merv.reg$residual aren't indentically

Hello, In one of the loop transformations I am developing, I need to convert eq and neq loop latch condition into less than or greater than depending on the control flow. The problem is that CmpInst::ICMP_EQ and CmpInst::ICMP_NE are neither signed nor unsigned in LLVM. Also, I did not find a way to find out if the integer operands of the CmpInst are signed or unsigned. Apparently, LLVM does

Dear all, I'd like tweaking the ... arguments that one user can pass in my function for fitting a model. More precisely, my objective function is (really) problematic to optimize using the "optim" function. Consequently, I'd like to add in the "control" argument of the latter function a "ndeps = rep(something, #par)" and/or "parscale =