similar to: RFC: methods() and showMethods() {was "debug"}

Hi, I'm developing in S4 and I wanted to see the methods for a specific class using showMethods but I didn't succed. Can someone help ? See the example below. setClass("myclass", representation( name ="character" ) ) setGeneric("mymeth", function(obj, ...){ standardGeneric("mymeth") } ) setMethod("mymeth",

In this post https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2013-March/004152.html a package author reports that S4 dispatch fails. I can reproduce this with a PkgA (attached; 'intervals' is a relatively light-weight CRAN package) that has DESCRIPTION with Depends: intervals Imports: graphics NAMESPACE: importFrom(graphics, "plot") export("plot")

I've installed R-devel R Under development (unstable) (2014-07-09 r66111) Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin13.1.0 (64-bit) and am trying to resolve some problems that I am seeing with my SparseM package. In prior versions I explicitly had: setGeneric("image", function(x, ...) standardGeneric("image")) and then used setMethod to define a method for the class matrix.csr but

Hello list. This is from an R session (admittedly, I''m still using R 2.11.1): > print function (x, ...) UseMethod("print") <environment: namespace:base> > showMethods("print") Function "print": <not a generic function> Don''t the two results contradict each other? Or do I have a terrible misunderstanding of what

showMethods isn't reporting inherited methods when it is first called. The methods are there and after calling them, showMethods gives the right output. Here is an example (using R-devel r39647): setClass("A", representation(x="numeric"), prototype=list(x=1)) setClass("B", contains="A", prototype=list(x=2))

Hi, I'm very confused about R structures and the methods to go with them. I'm using R for microarray analysis with Bioconductors. Suppose without reading the documentations, what's the best way to explore a data structure when you know nothing about it? I am currently using is() / class() to see what the object is. str() / attributes() to probe inside the object, and

Hi, is there any way to say: "this class 'x' is a S3 class?" For example what is the type of class "data.frame"? Is it a S3 class or S4? How can I get a complete list of all S3 classes currently available? Thanks,

Dear all, I'm getting more and more frustrated with the whole S4 thing and I'm looking for a more advanced summary on how to deal with them. Often I get error messages that don't make sense at all, or the code is not doing what I think it would do. Far too often inspecting the code requires me to go to the source, which doesn't really help in easily finding the bit of code

Hello to everybody I am developing a package using R and have the following problem: I used to work in a mixture of S3 and S4 mechanism environment: as a matter of fact, I used to define my classes (say "DB" for illustration) using the setClass function (with representation field), and I was using the S3 implicit mechanism writing the functions: print.DB and plot.DB. Recently, I

Hi, I've been using the package "graph" in the BioConductor assortment and writing some functions based on its classes. My question is not specific to this package or BioConductor (I think), but it serves as a useful example. I recently wanted to look at the code for the function "edgeMatrix" for the class "graphNEL". Usually I would type > func.foo and

I posted on this topic to r-help, but never got a sufficient answer, so I'm reposting here. [Env: R 2.11.1, Win Xp, using Eclipse/StatET] In a package I'm working on, I want to create as.matrix() and as.array() methods for a particular kind of object (log odds ratios). These are returned in a loddsratio object as the $coefficients component, a vector, but really reflect an underlying

Dear R developers, I am having a slightly weird issue with a S4 method defined in my package adegenet 1.2-4, with R 2.11.0. As far as I know, the problem is new, and the code implementing the method has not changed for more than a year and worked well so far. The problem is the following. I define, in the package, a method "[" for the S4 class 'genind'. The method's

Hi, The following question might come from my (deep) misunderstanding of the concepts in the package 'methods'. I have a class 'A', and a class 'B' inheriting 'A' (so defined with 'setClass' and the parameter 'contains="A"'. The class A has a method 'mymethod'. A call to 'showMethods("mymethod")' return the

Dear R developers, As you might have noticed, recent changes in R-dev will not allow the definition of S3 methods with S4 classes. But until now, we have defined "time<-" in our 'timeSeries' package as an S3 generic because other packages are using the same function. Indeed, if we had defined it as an S4 generic, the other packages would not coexist well with ours.

Full_Name: Colin A. Smith Version: 1.8.0 OS: Mac OS X 10.2.6 Submission from: (NULL) (216.102.90.18) Both Biobase and my package annaffy use S4 classes to define methods for "[". Both packages use the save image method of installation. (See annaffy 1.0.3 in BioC CVS.) Depending on how both packages are loaded, the Biobase definitions seem to be getting masked out: >

Hello. This question concerns the Methods package. I have created a new class and am trying to set a method for it for S4 group generic "Summary". I have run into some signature problems. An example: > setClass("track", representation(x="numeric", y="character")) [1] "track" > setGeneric("max", group="Summary")

The following I do not understand, but then I did'nt really use S4 methods ... > showMethods(plot) Function: plot (package graphics) x="ANY" x="lmList.confint" x="merMCMC" (inherited from: x="ANY") > plot(x=moda0MCMC) Error in as.double(y) : cannot coerce type 'S4' to vector of type 'double' > class(moda0MCMC) [1]

promptClass fails to identify methods associated with the class. Here is a fix: Index: promptClass.R =================================================================== --- promptClass.R (revision 41719) +++ promptClass.R (working copy) @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ if (nmeths > 0) { .meths.body <- " \\describe{" for (i in 1:nmeths) { - .sigmat

I have been trying to write a new class that reimplements the vector class. As a test of my overloading I decided to try and and call t.test on two vectors which were objects of my class rather than the default class. The overloaded length I wrote seems to work correctly. I used setMethod("length", "myvector", ...) setMethod("mean", "myvector", ...)

Hi, S4 method dispatch can be very slow. Would it be reasonable to cache the most recent dispatch, anticipating the next invocation will be on the same type? This would be very helpful in loops. fun0 <- function(x) sapply(x, paste, collapse="+") fun1 <- function(x) { paste <- selectMethod(paste, class(x[[1]])) sapply(x, paste,