similar to: bug in approx crashes R

Hi people, I am new in this list and could not find a FAQ for it in particular, furthermore I could not find my question answered in the official R FAQ or docs. I have simply something like this: > f<-approxfun(data[,1],data[,2]) and f is: > f function (v) .C("R_approx", as.double(x), as.double(y), as.integer(n), xout = as.double(v), as.integer(length(v)),

I am working on a project where we start with start with 2 long, equal-length vectors, massage them in various ways, and end up with a function mapping one interval to another. I'll call that function "f1." The last step in R is to generate f1 as the value of the approxfun function. I would like to put f1 into a package, but without having the package redo the creation of

Readers, According to the help '?approxfun', the function can be used to obtain the interpolated values. The following test was tried: > testinterpolation<-read.csv('test.csv',header=FALSE) > testinterpolation V1 V2 1 10 2 2 20 NA 3 30 5 4 40 7 5 50 NA 6 60 NA 7 70 2 8 80 6 9 90 9 10 100 NA >

Hi, Suppose I have two vectors, not necessarily the same length (in fact, they usually are different lengths): y.1 that has increasing values between 0 and 1; y.2 that has decreasing values between 1.0 and 0. You can picture these as being supply (= y.1) and demand (= y.2) curves from economics. I typically plot these vectors on the same graph against a common x variable, which happens to

Dear useRs, I have this dataset (D) with three columns. > dput(D) structure(c(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 2.990484802, 3.005018792, 3.019552781, 3.03408677, 3.048620759, 3.063154749, 3.077688738, 3.092222727, 3.106756717, 3.121290706, 3.135824695, 3.150358684, 3.164892674, 3.179426663, 3.193960652, 3.208494642, 3.223028631, 3.23756262,

Dear all, I have run into a problem when running some code implemented in the Bioconductor panp-package (applied to my own expression data), whereby gene expression values of known true negative probesets (x) are interpolated onto present/absent p-values (y) between 0 and 1 using the *approxfun - function*{stats}; when I have used R version 2.8, everything had worked fine, however, after updating

Thank you very much peter. It worked out nicely. I have additional question. How can I get Y-axis on log-scale? Thank you very much in Advance, Eliza UoS PP ________________________________ From: PIKAL Petr <petr.pikal at precheza.cz> Sent: 23 November 2017 16:22:39 To: Eliza Botto; r-help at r-project.org Subject: RE: adding percentage secondary y-axis Hi It is usually not

Full_Name: joerg van den hoff Version: 1.9.1 OS: MacOS and SunOS Submission from: (NULL) (149.220.4.88) follow up to ID 7166. something like approx(c(1,2),c(NA,NA),1.5,rule=2) crashes 1.9.1 on both systems (MacOS 10.3.5.: bus error, SunOS 5.9: segmentation fault) even if xout is within given x range (as in example above) where rule=2 seems not be relevant anyway.

Readers, Am trying to use the function 'approx' to interpolate time series data sets: data1: 01:23:40 5 01:23:45 10 01:23:50 12 01:23:55 7 data2: 01:23:42 01:23:47 01:23:51 01:23:54 The objective is to obtain interpolated values of 'data1' column 2 (5, 10, 12, 7) for the times shown in data2. Tried the following command but received the error shown:

How do I plot using multiple(2) y-axes? I have two series that use the same x-data, but have very different scales. Appreciate any feedback, Per Bak

#See David Williams' book "Weighing the odds", p286 y <- c(1.21, 0.51, 0.14, 1.62, -0.8, 0.72, -1.71, 0.84, 0.02, -0.12) ybar <- mean(y) ylength <- length(y) ybarv <- rep(ybar, ylength) x <- 1:ylength plot(x,y,asp=1,xlab="position",ylab="ybar",type="n",ylim=c(-1,1)) segments(x[1], ybar, x[ylength], ybar) segments(x,ybarv,x,y)

hi all i have another probably simple question. I have three variables say x, y and z. x and y are quite large and z is relative small. how can one plot the three variables on the same graph with two separate axis? (one for x and y and the other for z) e.g. x<-c(101,110,150,167,120) y<-c(120,135,175,95,200) z<-c(0.001, 0.15, 0.6, 0.8, 1) regards Allan

Hi It is usually not recommended but if you insist maybe library(plotrix) ?twoord.plot twoord.plot(lx=D[,1],ly=D[,2], rx=D[,1], ry=D[,3]) or plot.yy(x=D[,1],yright=D[,3], yleft=D[,2]) which allows only one x axis (see below). Cheers Petr plot.yy <- function (x, yright, yleft, yleftlim = NULL, yrightlim = NULL, xlab = NULL, yylab = list(NA, NA), pch = c(1, 2), col = c(1,2), linky

Hello, I am looking for a highly efficient matrix version of linear interpolation (like approx). As an example I have data like follows: x<-data.frame(time=1:20, x=(1:20)/10, y=runif(20)) t <- seq(1.5, 15.5 ,by=0.5) # and I found the following solution: nam <- names(x) app <- lapply(x[2:3],approx,x=x$time, xout=t) r <- c(1, 2*(1:(ncol(x)-1))) x.new <-

Full_Name: joerg van den hoff Version: 1.9.0 and 1.7.1 OS: MacOS (1.9.0), SunOS (1.7.1) Submission from: (NULL) (149.220.4.88) something like (sure not the originally intended input, but something like this can happen...): approx(c(1,2),c(NA,NA),1.5) crashes R (bus error under MacOS, segmentation fault under SunOS). search of the bug archive did not work. I hope this bug was not reported

This is R1.9.0, windows XP I run across the following: It is admittedly silly, but it shouldn't segfault: test <- list(y=1:100, x=rep(NaN, 100)) approx(test, xout=rep(NaN, 10)) Bombs! Kjetil Halvorsen

Hi to all, First of all, I prefer to tell that I am a R-newbie, so I apologize if this is a silly question (I have tried looking in the manuals, but without luck). I have two variables, y and z, that I want to plot against x in the same plot. I have done this before, using points() after plot(). But now the problem is that y and z are in different units of measurement, and their ranges are very

>>>>> Robert Almgren >>>>> on Fri, 3 May 2019 15:45:44 -0400 writes [ __ to R-help __ -- here diverted to R-devel on purpose] > There is something I do not think is right in the approx() > function in base R, with method="constant" and in the > presence of NA values. I have 3.6.0, but the behavior > seems to be the same in

Hi All, I have checked everything I could find abot graphics, but still cannot solve the problem. Are there any ways to make a graph that plots two lines and two different y-axes, each of them has a scale that is related to the respective line. For example, y1 has a range 1:50 and y1 ranges 0:1. The x-axe is the same for both. Thank you in advance. --- Gregor Gawron

Full_Name: Martin Frith Version: R-2.0.0 OS: linux-gnu Submission from: (NULL) (134.160.83.73) I have large vectors containing 100,000 to 20,000,000 numbers. However, they only contain a few hundred *distinct* numbers (e.g. positive integers < 200). When I do ecdf(v), it either runs out of memory, or it succeeds, but when I plot the ecdf with postscript, the output is unnecessarily bloated