similar to: beginner's guide to C++ programming with R packages?

Since, gcc was using upwards of 2gb of ram to compile my package, I just split all the functions into individual files. I guess I'm too clever for myself, because now I get hit with the "Argument list too long" error. Is there a way to deal with this aside from writing my own configure script (which could possibly feed the gcc commands one by one). -Whit RHEL 5 [whit at

Hi, I am working on an R package which includes some C routines. I would like to profile the C routines (built with GCC under Debian Linux). I tried running R with LD_PROFILE=/path/to/C/library.so R and executing functions that would invoke the code therein. The code takes about twice as long to run with LD_PROFILE set than without, so I am guessing that profiling is taking place. However,

I'm asking here, rather than R-devel, because it seems to be a Linux specific question and because I'm using Ubuntu-9.04. I'm trying to profile an package, and got errors, so I decided to follow BDR's (http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/06/02/4254.html) example exactly, and got same problem. Can anyone replicate? $ sudo mkdir -p /var/tmp//usr/lib/R/library/stats/libs $

Hi, I am trying to obtain basic block profiles for mediabench g721 benchmark. I have successfully built llvm in profile_enabling mode. Then so as to find out the block execution frequency, I ran the command, analyze encode.out-cbe. It generated gmon.out which I read using gprof. However, I did not get the basic block level execution frequency. Can anybody help me as to how I can extract the basic

Hi, Standard approach to profiling dynamically loaded libraries with gprof doesn't seem to work with LLVM: export LD_PROFILE=Mylib.so export LD_PROFILE_OUTPUT=. make ENABLE_PROFILING=1 // compiling my project opt -load Profile/Mylib.so -options... but no Mylib.so.profile (or gmon.out) is produced. Profiling libc.so.6 usage by "ls -l", however, works fine. Could anyone explain

Hi everybody, I have been interfacing some C++ library code into an R package but ran into optimization issues specific to memory management that require some insight into the GC. One of the C++ libraries returns simple vectors of integers, doubles and complex which are allocated and managed from the library itself. I cannot know the length of the array beforehand, so I cannot pre-allocate that

Hello. In the writing of my OCaml-R binding, I'm sort of confused when it comes to the use of the PROTECT and UNPROTECT macros. Basically, I have C stub functions that are in charge of calling R for everything. Here's a simple example: > CAMLprim value r_findvar (value symbol) { > /* The findVar function is defined in envir.c. It looks up a symbol > in an environment.

I suspect I'm looking in the wrong places, so guidance to the relevant documentation would be as welcome as a little code snippet. I have time series data stored in a MySQL database. There is the usual DATE field, along with a double precision number: there are daily values (including only normal working days: Monday through Friday). I actually have to do a couple things here. Because of

Hello, I have a problem with Hausman test. I am performing my analysis with these commands: > library(plm) > data<-read.csv2("paolo.csv",header=TRUE) > data< pdata.frame(data,index=c("FIRM","YEAR"),drop.index=TRUE,row.names=TRUE) > RECEIV~LSIZE+LAGE+LAGE2+CFLOW+STLEV+FCOST+PGROWTH+NGROWTH+TURN+GPROF+GPROF2 >

Note the typo in your 3rd line: data < Don't know if this means anything... Bert On Feb 11, 2018 7:33 AM, "PAOLO PILI" <paolo.pili at student.unife.it> wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem with Hausman test. I am performing my analysis with these > commands: > > > library(plm) > > data<-read.csv2("paolo.csv",header=TRUE) >

you are right about the 3rd line but it doesn't help me for my problem. I remove the 3rd line but there is still the same problem: Error in solve.default (dvcov): the system is numerically unique: reciprocity condition value = 1.63418e-19 Paolo 2018-02-11 16:54 GMT+01:00 Bert Gunter <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com>: > Note the typo in your 3rd line: data < > > Don't

No matter how I try, I can't seem to get a library profile from sprof on CentOS5. Does anyone know if sprof actually works on CentOS5? I'd be very interested to hear if anyone is using it successfully. At the moment I'm trying something like this to get the dump: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. LD_PROFILE=libmy.so ./mymain where libmy.so is the library I want to profile, and mymain is the

Howdy. I'm working on Altivec versions of some of the libFLAC functions. I figured the best candidates would be those that had MMX/SSE/3dnow versions, and I picked FLAC__lpc_restore_signal() to do first, since it's relatively simple. In stepping through some runs, it appears that 'order' mod 4 is always 0. Is that guaranteed, either by the format or by higher functions in the

# HG changeset patch # User Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> # Date 1341839122 -7200 # Node ID 2dd50c201ca0d3542f3589942ae9e51d33ec7509 # Parent 42f76d536b116d2ebad1b6705ae51ecd171d2581 stubdom: fix errors in newlib rpmlint found a few code bugs in newlib, and marks them as errors after rpm build. Add another newlib patch and apply it during stubdom build. I: A function uses a

Hi, all. Does anyone know how to profile R interpreter? I've tried gprof but it doesn't work. Thanks. Xiaoming [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hey guys, I am trying to speed up some of my LLVM/llc passes. Is there a way to use something like gprof on llc? If not, do you guys know anything that I can use to discover which routines of my passes are taking most of the time? thanks, Fernando

I needed the following patch to be able to use gprof with profiled build. regards, Benoit --- a/Makefile.rules (revision 37946) +++ b/Makefile.rules (working copy) @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ CXX.Flags := $(OPTIMIZE_OPTION) -pg -g C.Flags := $(OPTIMIZE_OPTION) -pg -g LD.Flags := $(OPTIMIZE_OPTION) -pg -g + KEEP_SYMBOLS := 1 else ifeq ($(ENABLE_OPTIMIZED),1) BuildMode := Release

If anyone has some reasonably valid gprof output laying around (from a vorbis encoding run), could you email it to me? Thanks, --Mike --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No

I have inherited a legacy S-plus system with about 10,000 lines of S and 10,000 lines of Fortran. It's now running under R. However, I would like to profile the fortran code with gprof or prof for performance tuning. I've successfully linked the .so file into a simple C driver program and profiled, but I can't seem to get profiling to work when using dyn.load() to use it from R. Do

Hello all, I am trying to install the llvm-gcc front end to use it in one of my projects, but I got stuck.. I am working on a Sun workstation: SunOS xxx 5.10 Generic_137137-09 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240 and I have gcc version 3.4.6: Reading specs from /sw/gcc-3.4.6/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/3.4.6/specs Configured with: /.scratch/andjo/lsw/src/gcc/gcc-3.4.6/configure