similar to: S4 Objects [Sec=Unclassified]

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "S4 Objects [Sec=Unclassified]"

2009 Jun 29
1
S4 and connection slot [Sec=Unclassified]
Hi all, I am having a problem trying to declare a slot representation to hold a file connection. With V2.8.0 I had been using: setClass("Element", representation( [other slots removed], datafileConn = setOldClass(c("file","connection")) ) ) This resulted in a warning but still ran okay. No however with V2.9.0 I am getting
2010 Oct 04
1
S4 class help pages [Sec=Unclassified]
Hi, I am working on producing an R package containing mostly S4 classes and methods. I have generated and filled out all the necessary .Rd files but find that once installed I am unable to access help pages for the classes using the ?package::classname-class syntax that is suggested when using the ?? apropos search. This lists my package classes and the class help pages. Instead, the
2010 Oct 04
2
Recursion error after upgrade to R_2.11.1 [Sec=Unclassified]
Hi all, After an upgrade from R_2.10.1 to R_2.11.1 I am now getting the following error: Error: evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion / options(expressions=)? This occurs in the initialize method of S4 classes where I was initialising attributes eg: .Object[['realtimeState']] <- list() I can avoid this new error by altering the code to do: .Object$realtimeState <-
2009 Jun 23
3
V2.9.0 changes [Sec=Unclassified]
Hi all, Prefix: I am a frustrated Java coder in R. I am coding a medium sized ecosystem modelling program in R. I have changed to using S4 objects and it has cost me an order of magnitude in execution speed over the functional model. I cannot afford this penalty and have found that it is the result of all the passing-by-value of objects. I see that you can now safely inherit from
2010 Oct 13
1
Wierd nlm behaviour in 2.10.1 and 2.12.0 [Sec=Unclassified]
Hi all, When upgrading to 2.11.1 recently I noticed different results being produced by my code. After much digging I have finally narrowed it to a call to nlm(). This can be replicated by: FixedRemovals<-1836180125888 AbStageInitial<-2223033830403 Rates<- 0.3102445 nlm(function(rootM,Abund,Loss,OtherM) {(Loss-(rootM/(rootM+OtherM)* (1-exp(-(rootM+OtherM)))*
2009 May 05
0
S4 slot of type connection [Sec=Unclassified]
I am having trouble declaring a slot of type "connection" or "file" in which to store a file connection. I get a warning message when class definition is loaded: In .completeClassSlots(ClassDef, where) : undefined slot classes in definition of "Element": datafileConn(class "file") Can anyone suggest what type I should be using for the slot. Type
2008 Mar 17
1
generalized linear mixed models with a beta distribution [Sec=Unclassified]
Craig A Faulhaber wrote: >I am interested in using a generalized linear mixed model with data > that best fits a beta distribution (i.e., the data is bounded between > 0 and 1 but is not binomial). .. >For clarification, here's what I'm trying to model: >I have a beta-distributed response variable (y). I have a fixed-effect >explanatory variable (treatment),
2018 Oct 03
2
Non-matching linkedid on CDR Records [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi asterisk-users, We have recently moved to the 13.x branch of Asterisk from 11.x, and we're trying to correlate CDR records from multiple-legs for billing purposes. As part of this change we have added 'linkedid' to our CDR table schema in an attempt to join the multiple records into one billable record. The call path can be simplified as (transport types in brackets): SIP
2012 Mar 22
0
Disable AD checking per share in smb.conf [sec=unclassified]
Hi, Is it possible to have non-authenticating shares on an server with security=ADS ? I have a RHEL server, with Centrify Express, and joined to a domain, but I would like to have a samba share that doesn't request a username/password for machines not on the domain. When I have a plain windows XP machine (not on the domain) attempt to connect, I get asked for a username/password. Is
2012 Apr 23
1
Disable AD checking per share in smb.conf [sec=unclassified]
Hi, Is it possible to have non-authenticating shares on an server with security=ADS ? I have a RHEL server, with Centrify Express, and joined to a domain, but I would like to have a samba share that doesn't request a username/password for machines not on the domain. When I have a plain windows XP machine (not on the domain) attempt to connect, I get asked for a username/password. Is
2008 Aug 27
1
ifelse() fill order and recycling rules [Sec=Unclassified]
Hi all, Using R v2.7.1, platform i386-pc-mingw32 Can someone please shed some light on the behaviour of ifelse() for me? My intent is to calc relative proportions of z$b, at the same time subsetting z$b based on z$a. I could attack the problem other ways (suggestions welcome) but I am also intrigued by the _order_ in which ifelse seems to assign values, and how recycling works. For instance,
2018 Oct 08
3
Non-matching linkedid on CDR Records [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi all, Just thought I'd update this thread in case anyone else is Googling trying to find out how to do this... I found the solution to my problem to be to use the IAXVAR() function to pass the accountcode between the Asterisk boxen and update the CHANNEL(accountcode) with that variable. Thanks to Richard @ Digium for the reply that clarified my misunderstanding. Calum On Wed, 2018-10-03
2009 May 12
1
Power function for ratio of lognormal means: two equally valid results? [SEC=Unclassified]
Hi All This is a general stats problem that I am dealing with using R, so any help is greater appreciated. I have two lognormal distributions with means M1 and M2. If we have: H0: log(M1/M2)=0 H1: log(M1/M2) !=0 equivalent to log(M1/M2)=log(1+P) where P<0 or P>0. If we calculate the power for a value of P=0.1 or P=-0.1 (i.e. a 10% difference) and say assume SE{log(M1/M2)}=0.05, and
2006 Apr 28
1
Problem calling xyplot() within a function
Hi All I'm fairly new at R so there might be on obvious solution to my problem with calling the lattice function xyplot( ) from my own function. The function script is given below. The problem is that the xyplot() call does not do anything! I just get a blank graphics window and no error messages. The simple plot() function call works fine when not commented out so I know the data is
2005 May 17
3
locator() (PR#7873)
Full_Name: Sascha Frydman Version: 2.1.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (147.66.131.10) when Esc is pressed while a plot with locator running has the focus, R crashes. eg. plot(1) locator(1) I am running in SDI mode
2009 Feb 07
3
Re-post data format question (apologies)
Hello all, I have a *.csv file that looks like this (actual file is orders of magnitude larger): Site taxa no.ind forest LMA 1 forest LCY 1 forest SCO 1 meadow LMA 2 meadow LCY 1 meadow PNT
2014 May 01
2
Request to Replace Recordplot ,, replayplot
Record plot which stores a plot to an internal R data structure and Replay Plot which replays the plot enables one to keep plots around and use them accross sessions at least until version 3. If you cannot restore old plots and treat them as data and save accross sessions, there is little reason for recordPlot. Either R needs to dispense with internal formats entirelly, a bad move in my opinion
2009 Oct 12
3
xyplot does not find variable in data
When we call a lattice function such as xyplot, to what extent does the "data" designation cause the function to look inside the "data" for variables? In the examples below, the "subset" argument understands that "Variety" is a variable in the data. But the "scales" argument does not understand that "nitro" is a variable in the data.
2006 Apr 27
1
Filename too long
This is the rsync version I am using. rsync version 2.5.5 protocol version 26 Copyright (C) 1996-2002 by Andrew Tridgell and others <http://rsync.samba.org/> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, batchfiles, IPv6, 64-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums I have a file with a looooong name which I rsync from PC1 to PC2. (redhat-9) I am getting the
2019 Apr 30
1
patch to improve matrix conformability error message
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:28:46PM -0700, frederik at ofb.net wrote: > I think this is a good idea. Is there a reason why it got no interest? > Slippery slope? What's the next step? Can it get committed? > Or maybe others were also just occupied trying to figure out how > Joshua's second message had timestamp earlier than his first message? As a new subscriber, I guess my