similar to: Problems building R 2.9.0... on SGI and Sun once again

Hi, I'm upgrading to R 2.2.1 and have bumped into some problems. I have been successful with installing on x86 and PPC Linux, but am unable to install R on Solaris 7 and on IRIX 6.5. Configuration and compilation go through just fine, but "make install" fails: gmake[1]: Entering directory `/scratch/atossava/R-2.2.1/doc' installing doc ... ../tools/install-sh: no destination

Hi, I've got the latest MIPS compilers that are C99 aware (7.4.4). "configure" finishes with: R is now configured for mips-sgi-irix6.5 Source directory: . Installation directory: /afs/bi/v/@sys/apps/stats/R/2.4.1 C compiler: cc -c99 -OPT:IEEE_NaN_inf=ON -g Fortran 77 compiler: f77 -OPT:IEEE_NaN_inf=ON -g C++ compiler: CC

Hello guys. Following Dug's withdrawal of the SSH1 AFS patches, I'm trying to give OpenSSH installation another shot. It fails. The setting: * Platforms: Linux (Immunix 6.2), Solaris 7, IRIX 6.5, OSF1 4.0F, HP-UX 10.20. * Compilers: StackGuard egcs on Linux, vendor-supplied native on others (Workshop 5.0 Sun; MIPSpro 7.3 SGI; OSFCMPLRS440 package; HP ANSI C compiler B3899BA

Since there never was an answer on the secureshell at securityfocus.com list to this question, I thought I'd ask you guys on your own list and maybe I'll even get an answer. If the answer involves PAM in any way, then the most obvious question becomes "what about IRIX, Tru64, or any other platforms whose login procedure does not have PAM?". ----- Forwarded message from Atro

Robert, [OpenSSH with AFS not compiling on HP-UX 10.20] I'm using OpenSSH 2.9p2, OpenSSL 0.9.6a, KTH KerberosIV 1.0.8, and AFS 3.4 5.81. > cc: "auth-passwd.c", line 188: error 1530: Undefined struct or union. > cc: "auth-passwd.c", line 188: error 1529: Cannot select field of non-structure. I had exactly the same problem compiling SSH Inc. ssh-1.2.27 with AFS for

Hi, I configured OpenSSH 3.0.2p1 with ./configure --disable-suid-ssh --with-pam --with-kerberos4=/usr/athena \ --with-afs=/usr/afsws --with-ipaddr-display \ --with-ssl-dir=/afs/bi/v/@sys/libraries/openssl/latest My "latest" OpenSSL is 0.9.6a. KTH krb4 is 1.1. When linking the binaries, the KTH krb4 libdes conflicts with the OpenSSL libdes. It seems to be possible to get around

Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > The schily tools act as a container to publish the current code state. There is > > no such maintained web page. > > I was referring to the summary on the SourceForge page, where you just list the contents of the package without explaining why one would want to download it. I thought I don't need to make advertizing for

I'm trying to build R-1.5.0 on an SGI. I downloaded the tar file just a couple of hours ago. These are the various variables I set before configuring, and the arguments to configure I'm using: export R_PAPERSIZE=letter CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/dfs/src/readline export LDFLAGS='-L/usr/common/lib -L/usr/lib32 -L/usr/dfs/src/readline' export CONFIG_SHELL=/v/bin/sh SHELL=/v/bin/sh ./configure

Hello, world! I'm considering running Asterisk 1.2.4 on Solaris 10 on a Sun Fire X2100 server or two (Opteron CPU, nForce 4 chipset), and apparently this works. I've read that the Zaptel package won't work on anything other than Linux, since it's intended to hook into the Linux kernel in the form of a kernel module. This concerns me, since I've read that ztdummy, the

On 26/04/16 10:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >> >> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one >> of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's >> all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the >> claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or

Hello List, Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or something else? Thanks, Jack

On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >> >> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well >> that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to >> corroborate the claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or

On 04/27/16 13:21, Pouar wrote: > On 04/27/16 08:49, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >>>> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, >>>> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well >>>> that's all news to me,

Scott Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:27:26PM -0700, Alice Wonder wrote: >> >> Some of the BSDs use to have a bourne shell and maybe some do, I don't know. >> > Yup. > >> bash is mostly compatible with bourne (can run most bourne scripts) which is why /bin/sh is a symlink to /bin/bash on GNU and most other *nix systems. > > Bash can run

GNU make does not work for some of my other work so for compiling R I am trying to use "gmake" which is a link to the correct version of gnu make. I'm not sure if this should work but it looks like it is suppose to, as $(MAKE) gets expanded to "gmake" most places. However, "make" gets used in R-pre0.63.1/src/library/modreg/src and fails. Is this a bug or should

>>> >>last OS I can think of with an actual Bourne shell was Solaris. >>> >> >>> >> >> > >> >The various *BSD's have & use the actual Bourne shell .... >> > >> > > Which one? All the BSDs I know of use the Almquist Shell except for > OpenBSD which uses a patched version of the Public Domain Korn Shell

1. How do I perform filter by facets using the C++ api? 2. Has anyone ported xapian to objective C thanks Amish -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xapian.org/pipermail/xapian-devel/attachments/20120423/1d1c58dd/attachment.html>

On 12/19/17 19:55, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/19/2017 07:16 AM, Manish Jain wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am writing a book about Unix (Linux / FreeBSD) and my book needs >> documentation for TeamViewer13 running under Centos 7 (64-bit). >> >> Unfortunately, running TeamViewer does not get me a GUI -- the install >> went smoothly and teamviewerd daemon is

<m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Ah. I don't remember if I was using csh, or ksh, and didn't realize about > bash. I *think* I vaguely remember that sh seemed to be more capable than > I remembered. If you like to check what the Bourne Shell did support in the late 1980s, I recommend you to fetch recent Schily tools from:

It was the mid/late-90s, but I seem to recall Bourne being the default shell, although sh/ksh/csh were all available with a typical install. On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 08:02:56AM -0400, mark wrote: > > On 04/24/15 06:57, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: > > > > > >On 04/24/15 06:07, E.B. wrote: