Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Problem with LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting in ldpaths (PR#13637)"
2002 Jul 18
1
R INSTALL: problem related to LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Well, I've found that the line in INSTALL
that gives the problem is
gzip -dc "${1}" | (cd "${tmpdir}" && tar -xf -)
("tar: /usr/local/lib/libpthread.so.0: version `GLIBC_2.2' not found
(required by /lib/librt.so.1)")
If I run that command from the shell, i.e.,
gzip -dc KernSmooth_2.22-7.tar.gz | (cd /tmp/R.INSTALL.2186 && tar -xf -)
it runs
2008 Sep 24
1
ubuntu installation: can't find ldpaths
I'm trying to install R under Ubuntu 7.10 (gutsy; Linux
2.6.22-15-generic x86_64). Following the instructions at
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/README, I installed r-base,
r-base-core, and r-base-dev without any problems. When I open R,
however, I get the message "Can't open /usr/lib64/R/etc/ldpaths".
That file is linked to /etc/R/ldpaths, which doesn't exist
2013 Jul 28
1
Problem with ldpaths in Ubuntu 13.04
Hello!
I'm trying to install R-3.0.1 on an Ubuntu machine (64 bit, version 13.04). I have uninstalled and installed several times, but to no avail.
I keep getting errors about missing ldpaths, and installing packages does not work at all.
Here is the information:
erin@erin-Lenovo-IdeaPad-Y480:~$ sudo apt-get install r-base
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading
2011 Nov 09
1
install error ldpaths: No such file or directory
Hi
I'm trying to install R on Ubuntu 11.10 and it seems to install fine with both apt-get and dpkg but always when I start R I get
jt42@bioinf4:~# R
/usr/local/bin/R: line 237: /usr/lib/R/etc/ldpaths: No such file or directory
R version 2.14.0 (2011-10-31)
Copyright (C) 2011 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
ISBN 3-900051-07-0
Platform:
2007 Mar 26
2
setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Dear R-help,
I am trying to use a package (not from CRAN) which includes two shared
library (.so) files. The maintainer suggests inserting two lines
in /usr/bin/R,
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}:path-to-package/lib
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
This works, but I felt more comfortable putting the first line
in .Renviron or $R_HOME/etc/Renviron.site. However this doesn't seem to
work, and I
2013 Oct 25
2
problem with ldpaths
I've just installed r-base (several times!) using the instructions at
http://cran.us.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/
and for some reason it is not creating a /etc/R/ldpaths file.
I've tried a few times, tried purging, and removing everything in
/etc/R and
/usr/lib/R
as suggested by Dirk,
and reinstalling but still get
$ R
/usr/bin/R: line 236: /usr/lib/R/etc/ldpaths: No such file
2010 Oct 06
1
How do I put ldpaths in a specific place?
Hi Everybody,
I made R (v. 2.11.1) from source with the following config option:
./configure --prefix=/mnt/ami-centos5.5-64bit-base \
--exec-prefix=/mnt/ami-centos5.5-64bit-base \
--with-tcltk
All seemed to go well, but when I tested it with:
/usr/sbin/chroot /mnt/ami-centos5.5-64bit-base R
It told me:
/bin/R: line 217:
2009 Jul 09
2
Mysteriously vanishing LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Using R-2.8.0 and R-2.8.1, I get behaviour like this:
R version 2.8.0 (2008-10-20)
Copyright (C) 2008 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
ISBN 3-900051-07-0
[....]
> Sys.getenv("LD_LIBRARY_PATH")
LD_LIBRARY_PATH
2007 Jul 05
2
LD_LIBRARY_PATH issues
Here is the thing. All workstations in the network have the /etc/profile
modified and set up to call a profile script in the network that sets up
variables that we need here. Here $LD_LIBRARY_PATH and other variables
get set, fixed, or modified to support our development process. The
weird thing is that while in a TTY the $LD_LIBRARY_PATH is fine and
retains its value. But if I log in to the gui
2012 Jan 10
1
[PATCH] Prepend local library path to LD_LIBRARY_PATH for tests, instead of replacing it
Overwriting LD_LIBRARY_PATH broke some tests when running with fakeroot.
---
align/Makefile.am | 2 +-
cat/Makefile.am | 2 +-
clone/Makefile.am | 2 +-
df/Makefile.am | 2 +-
edit/Makefile.am | 2 +-
fish/Makefile.am | 2 +-
haskell/Makefile.am | 2 +-
ocaml/Makefile.am |
2011 Nov 23
1
[PATCH] run script: Don't overwrite LD_LIBRARY_PATH and PERL5LIB
This change allows the run scripts of virt-v2v and libguestfs to be chained.
---
run.in | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/run.in b/run.in
index 9388398..7cef715 100755
--- a/run.in
+++ b/run.in
@@ -37,9 +37,19 @@ b=@abs_builddir@
export TMPDIR="$b"
# Set local environment relative to this script.
-export
2010 Dec 17
1
Passing LD_LIBRARY_PATH through sudo
Hello,
I have a CentOS 5.5/64bit VM, where I only have sudo rights:
afarber ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
I'm trying to pass LD_LIBRARY_PATH
through sudo to install DBD::Oracle
( https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=63678 )
and have tried using "sudo -E" and also
changing these lines in the stock /etc/sudoers:
Defaults !env_reset
Defaults env_keep =
2005 Feb 21
1
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is harmfull
Hi.
Consider the following situation: Solaris 8, /usr/local has gcc 2.95,
my home has gcc 3.4.3, my gcc is first on PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is
unset (everything is perfect since I always use -R). In fact, programs
compiled with my gcc do not work if LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set to
something which has /usr/local/lib before home/lib, because it
overrides stored path (-R) and I got
libgcc_s.so.1
2005 Feb 21
1
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is harmfull
Hi.
Consider the following situation: Solaris 8, /usr/local has gcc 2.95,
my home has gcc 3.4.3, my gcc is first on PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is
unset (everything is perfect since I always use -R). In fact, programs
compiled with my gcc do not work if LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set to
something which has /usr/local/lib before home/lib, because it
overrides stored path (-R) and I got
libgcc_s.so.1
2009 Jun 08
1
Cannot get LD_LIBRARY_PATH to work under NX (freenx)
Hello,
I'm trying to get the LD_LIBRARY_PATH set from .bash_profile (Centos 5.3
fully updated).
This is a part of my .bash_profile:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/home/szyman/omnet/omnetpp-2.3p1/lib
export R_HISTSIZE=2000000000
Everything works fine under standard ssh login, but under NX client the
LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable is missing (the R_HISTSIZE is exported properly).
Any
2015 Feb 12
3
[PATCH 1/2] run: Set DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH along with LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Mac OS X uses DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH rather than LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
---
run.in | 14 ++++++--------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/run.in b/run.in
index a8c2904..bf7ea1b 100755
--- a/run.in
+++ b/run.in
@@ -77,13 +77,10 @@ fi
2023 Jun 28
1
LINUX SuSE15.4 (GNU & Intel) compiler problem in "configure" file
Dear R-Support Team:
I am fully aware that you are all extremely busy and forward this request
as brief and clear as possible:
Thank you for the comprehensive Documentation for R-4.3.1 (very helpful)
A limitation seems to have emerged, using SuSE SP15.4 (kernel:
5.14.21-150400.22) on an INTEL Skylake-e
SERVER, applying both the GNU and Intel (2023.0.0) compilers.
a) The
2006 Mar 07
2
R started in terminal shell script or ESS steps on LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
Hi all,
Just noted this behavior in the past couple of days, where if R is
started in a shell script such as:
gnome-terminal [-e][-x] R
or in ESS (version 5.2.12 with Emacs or XEmacs), the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
environment variable is not properly appended to, resulting in the loss
of the pre-start value.
This is using R Version 2.2.1 Patched (2006-02-28 r37448) on FC4.
I noted this when
2020 Feb 21
0
Re: alternatives for hooking dlopen() without LD_LIBRARY_PATH or LD_AUDIT?
* Richard W. M. Jones:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:19:34PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I think what confuses me is that keep talking about a single binary, but
>> clearly there is this separate vddk DSO, and there is talk of plugins.
>> So it seems to me that multiple files are involved already?
>
> nbdkit is a standalone binary that happens to be able to load
2020 Feb 21
0
Re: alternatives for hooking dlopen() without LD_LIBRARY_PATH or LD_AUDIT?
* Richard W. M. Jones:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 04:00:30PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>>
>> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:19:34PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> >> I think what confuses me is that keep talking about a single binary, but
>> >> clearly there is this separate vddk DSO, and there is talk of plugins.