similar to: actual argument matching does not conform to the definition (PR#13635)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "actual argument matching does not conform to the definition (PR#13635)"

2009 Apr 02
2
actual argument matching does not conform to the definition (PR#13634)
Full_Name: Wacek Kusnierczyk Version: 2.10.0 r48269 OS: Ubuntu 8.04 Linux 32 bit Submission from: (NULL) (129.241.199.164) In the following example (and many other cases): quote(a=1) # 1 the argument matching is apparently incorrect wrt. the documentation (The R Language Definition, v 2.8.1, sec. 4.3.2, p. 23), which specifies the following algorithm for argument matching: 1. Attempt to
2009 Jan 21
0
patch for src/main/character.c
Attached is a suggested patch for src/main/character.c. It does not fix a bug, but rather provides an improvement on the recent extension of do_grep. In essence, instead of four occurences of 'invert ^ LOGICAL(ind)[i]' that accommodate for the option 'invert' added to grep, there is one occurence of 'LOGICAL(ind)[i] ^= invert' that modifies in-place the logical vector of
2008 Oct 26
4
odd behaviour of identical
given what ?identical says, i find the following odd: x = 1:10 y = 1:10 all.equal(x,y) [1] TRUE identical(x,y) [1] TRUE y[11] = 11 y = y[1:10] all.equal(x,y) [1] TRUE identical(x,y) [1] FALSE y [1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 length(y) [1] 10 looks like a bug. platform i686-pc-linux-gnu arch i686 os linux-gnu system
2008 Jun 18
1
strsplit and the empty string
Hello, I am wondering about the behaviour of strsplit. When the pattern matches the beginning of the search string, the mepty string is added to the result, but that's not the case when the pattern matches the end of the search string: strsplit(" hello dolly ") [1] "" "hello" "dolly" The man for strsplit explains the algorithm: " The algorithm
2009 Feb 12
0
Patch for src/main/character.c, systematizing recent fix to do_grep
The attached patch provides a modification to the recent fix/improvement to do_grep already included in the most recent development version. The original fix added new functionality to the grep function by adding a new parameter, 'invert'. In the source code for the underlying do_grep, the value of the parameter is used to invert the logical match-no match flag vector ind. The
2009 Jan 02
1
[Fwd: Re: [R] Randomly remove condition-selected rows from a matrix]
Following Duncan's suggestion, I forward the below to R-devel. vQ -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [R] Randomly remove condition-selected rows from a matrix Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 10:34:52 -0500 From: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch at stats.uwo.ca> To: Wacek Kusnierczyk <Waclaw.Marcin.Kusnierczyk at idi.ntnu.no> CC: R help <R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch>
2009 Mar 14
1
multiple hypothesis testing
Dear all, Myself Vijaykumar Muley working as senior research fellow. By training I am a computational biologist with not a strong knowledge of statistics. I have done some analysis which is explained as follows, I have 10340 (X) profiles of binary vectors with same length(N=845), I will call then "gene profiles" for example... v1 v2 v3 v4.....vN a 1 0 1 0 1 b 0
2009 Apr 25
0
incorrect output and segfaults from sprintf with %*d (PR#13675)
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 14:40, Wacek Kusnierczyk <Waclaw.Marcin.Kusnierczyk at idi.ntnu.no> wrote: > maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch wrote: >> >> =A0 =A0 vQ> sprintf has a documented limit on strings included in the ou= tput using the >> =A0 =A0 vQ> format '%s'. =A0It appears that there is a limit on the leng= th of strings included >> =A0 =A0 vQ>
2009 May 14
1
Simulation)
I wrote As a beginner, I agree .... the for loop is much clearer to me. Wacek Kusnierczyk <Waclaw.Marcin.Kusnierczyk at idi.ntnu.no> replied > >well, that's quite likely. especially given that typical courses in >programming, afaik, include for looping but not necessarily functional >stuff -- are you an r beginner, or a programming beginner? > Both. My PhD is in
2009 Mar 29
2
if does not covert raw to logical (PR#13630)
Full_Name: Wacek Kusnierczyk Version: 2.8.0 and 2.10.0 r48242 OS: Ubuntu 8.04 Linux 32 bit Submission from: (NULL) (80.202.30.36) The following raises an error: if (as.raw(1)) 1 # error: unimplemented type 'raw' in 'asLogical' However, ?'if' says: " Arguments: cond: A length-one logical vector that is not 'NA'. Conditions of length
2009 Mar 30
1
duplicated fails to rise correct errors (PR#13632)
Full_Name: Wacek Kusnierczyk Version: 2.8.0 and 2.10.0 r48242 OS: Ubuntu 8.04 Linux 32 bit Submission from: (NULL) (129.241.110.161) In the following code: duplicated(data.frame(), incomparables=NA) # Error in if (!is.logical(incomparables) || incomparables) .NotYetUsed("incomparables != FALSE") : # missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed the raised error is clearly not the
2009 Apr 01
0
回复: R-help Digest, Vol 73, Issue 32
Dear sir,    How to do bilinear time series in R?Is there any functions or packages?  thank you! -----Sincerely yours Kuangnan Fang 方匡南 敬上 department of statistics ,Economics school,Xia men University. Fujian Province (361005) China Mobile Phone:15860721915 SKYPE: ruiqwy MSN Messenger: ruiqwy@hotmail.com QQ:39863401 --- 09年3月31日,周二, r-help-request@r-project.org
2009 Apr 21
8
incorrect output and segfaults from sprintf with %*d (PR#13667)
Full_Name: Wacek Kusnierczyk Version: 2.10.0 r48365 OS: Ubuntu 8.04 Linux 32bit Submission from: (NULL) (129.241.110.141) sprintf has a documented limit on strings included in the output using the format '%s'. It appears that there is a limit on the length of strings included with, e.g., the format '%d' beyond which surprising things happen (output modified for conciseness):
2009 Mar 20
1
sprintf causes a segfault (PR#13613)
Full_Name: Wacek Kusnierczyk Version: 2.8.0 and 2.10.0 r48163 OS: Ubuntu 8.04 Linux 32bit Submission from: (NULL) (129.241.198.172) the following code illustrates a problem with sprintf which consistently causes a segfault when applied to certain type of arguments. it also shows inconsistent consequences of the segfault: (e = tryCatch(stop(), error=identity)) # e is an error object
2008 Nov 17
2
assign("FALSE", TRUE)
It was recently pointed out by Wacek Kusnierczyk that although one is prevented from doing FALSE <- TRUE one *can* do assign("FALSE",TRUE) and have an object named ``FALSE'' with value TRUE in one's workspace. This apparently has no deleterious effects; e.g. doing sample(1:7,replace=FALSE) gives a random permutation of 1:7 as expected and desired. I.e. the local
2009 Mar 28
0
Incorrect behaviour of [.data.frame (PR#13628)
Full_Name: Wacek Kusnierczyk Version: 2.8.0 and 2.10.0 r48231 OS: Ubuntu 8.04 Linux 32 bit Submission from: (NULL) (80.202.30.36) According to the R Language definition (sec. 3.4.3), [.data.frame has the following properties: "if two indices are supplied (even if one is empty) it creates matrix-like indexing for a structure that is basically a list of vectors of the same length. If a
2009 Apr 29
1
Newbie R question PART2
Hi Tena, I recommend rapache for building websites with R. See http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/rapache/ -Ista > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Tena Sakai" <tsakai at gallo.ucsf.edu> > To: <ted.harding at manchester.ac.uk>, <r-help at r-project.org> > Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:04:53 -0700 > Subject: Re: [R] Newbie R question PART2 >
2008 Nov 10
6
Variable passed to function not used in function in select=... in subset
Hello! I have the problem that in my function the passed variable is not used, but the variable name of the dataframe itself?- difficult to explain, but an easy example: TestFunc<-function(df, group) { ??? print(names(subset(df, select=group))) } df1<-data.frame(group="G1", visit="V1", value=0.9) TestFunc(df1, c("group", "visit")) Result: [1]
2009 Mar 22
0
gsub('(.).(.)(.)', '\\3\\2\\1', 'gsub') (PR#13617)
Full_Name: Wacek Kusnierczyk Version: 2.10.0 r48181 OS: Ubuntu 8.04 Linux 32bit Submission from: (NULL) (129.241.199.135) there seems to be something wrong with r's regexing. consider the following example: gregexpr('a*|b', 'ab') # positions: 1 2 # lengths: 1 1 gsub('a*|b', '.', 'ab') # .. where the pattern matches any number of
2009 Mar 29
0
Another incorrect behaviour of [.data.frame (PR#13629)
Full_Name: Wacek Kusnierczyk Version: 2.8.0 and 2.10.0 r48231 OS: Ubuntu 8.04 Linux 32 bit Submission from: (NULL) (129.241.198.65) In a previous report (Incorrect behaviour of [.data.frame (PR#13628), awaiting approval) I showed that [.data.frame behaves incorrectly (i.e., in contradiction to what ?'[.data.frame' and the R Language Definition say): d = data.frame(a=1:3, b=4:6)