similar to: CESA-2005:366 Important CentOS 3 ia64 kernel - kernel security update (Read the NOTES)

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2005:366 for i386 and x86_64 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-366.html refers, The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: kernel-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL.i586.rpm kernel-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL.i686.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL.i586.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL.i686.rpm kernel-doc-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL.noarch.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

All, There have been many requests for added kernel features that the upstream provider left out of the standard kernel. (ReiserFS, Video4Linux, Firewire support, XFS, NTFS, JFS, etc.). We want the main release CDs to contain a standard kernel for compatibility and stability reasons. CentOS is created as a clone, and it needs to be as close as possible to the upstream distro. That being said,

Hi folks... trying to pick between jfs and xfs for a filesystem. In the past we've used jfs with CentOS + centosplus, however, an older post indicated that this may not be the best choice as the version of jfs included with the centosplus kernel would only be as new as the version that was included in the 2.6.18 kernel as RH doesn't backport fixes... It looks like xfs isn't part of

On 09/25/2020 05:42 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:51 AM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >> On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >>>> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:51 AM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > > On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > >> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the latest version of jfs module but kmod-jfs does not

Hello all, I'm relatively new to CentOS, but I've been using linux as my main operating system on both the desktop and server ends for the past 4 years. I currently have a PIII server with two 160GB IDE hard drives in it, in a virtual RAID 1 array. At the time of installation, the only FS choices for the largest partition, 120GB, were ext2 and ext3. I chose ext3, but now am wishing

Hello I run the latest kernel from centosplus and use a JFS partition. Even though the jfs tools are installed, when the server crashes, it doesn't run fsck.jfs automatically when at boot time it detects that the partition is corrupted I have to run fsck.jfs manually and mount the drive. Is there a way to make fsck.jfs run automatically if required ? (I recently moved from Fedora to

(This is a copy of an email I've sent to the jfs-discussion list. I'm copying here in the hope that I'll get help from somewhere...) I'm running Centos 4.2 with kernel-2.6.9-22.0.2.106.unsupported and jfsutils-1.1.10-3.2 from the centosplus distribution, with a jfs partition for my maildir mail spool, accessed using the dovecot IMAP server. It seems that dovecot doesn't

On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the latest version of jfs module but kmod-jfs does not seem to be available. >> >> Is anyone running it on the current version of CentOS?

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

RHEL 4 (and thus CentOS 4) do not have appletalk module included. CentOSPlus rather thoughtfully has the 'unsupported' version which would have the appletalk module but I have been unable to get the old megaraid driver to run compiled from the kernel-devel for these 'unsupported' kernels. Thus I would love to simply compile the appletalk module myself from the standard

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2005:1210-1 CentOS 4 x86_64 jfsutils - bugfix update (CENTOSPLUS Only) This package is for the version of jfsutils is that is included in the centosplus repo for CentOS-4 ... this is not an update to the main CentOS-4 repo. The JFS team has released a new version of jfsutils and this has been incorporated into this CentOS Plus version. x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2005:1210-1 CentOS 4 i386 jfsutils - bugfix update (CENTOSPLUS Only) This package is for the version of jfsutils is that is included in the centosplus repo for CentOS-4 ... this is not an update to the main CentOS-4 repo. The JFS team has released a new version of jfsutils and this has been incorporated into this CentOS Plus version. i386:

Hi, The short version: - no more custom kernel - CD-version available too Longer version: The separate announcement for ia64 is due the fact that initial 4.0 version was distributed with customised kernel. That was done because i had to fix the serial console installation on rx1600 box which was not working on upstream vendor kernel. Later upstream vendor has made patch for it too (much

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > > I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the latest version of jfs module but kmod-jfs does not seem to be available. > > Is anyone running it on the current version of CentOS? My suggestion is to use the centosplus kernel

For some time now I have been puzzled as to why certain portions of my system boot were quite slow -- but only after journal recoveries. I was fearing that there was some ugly interaction between the recovery and the use of the journal shortly afterward but alas that is not the case. So just in case anybody else is seeing this problem and decides to try to hunt it down, let me save you some

Hi All, I am trying to recompile the stock kernel to include XFS. At install time of the OS I select to install the kernel source code however I do not have a /usr/src/linux-2.6.9-5.0.3.EL-smp directory. I then learned you must run "yum install kernel-sourcecode" to properly install the source. When I run the command this is what happens ( see below) . The error I get is: warning:

Hi, https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-586.html backported to compile agaist CentOS-3 level software. This is my bad. I forgot the damn thing while the firefox security update came out. ia64: centosplus/ia64/RPMS/firefox-1.0.6-1.4.1.centos3.ia64.rpm centosplus/ia64/SRPMS/firefox-1.0.6-1.4.1.centos3.src.rpm s390: centosplus/s390/RPMS/firefox-1.0.6-1.4.1.centos3.s390.rpm