Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "gsub('(.).(.)(.)', '\\3\\2\\1', 'gsub') (PR#13617)"
2009 Mar 22
0
gsub('(.).(.)(.)', '\\3\\2\\1', 'gsub')
there seems to be something wrong with r's regexing. consider the
following example:
gregexpr('a*|b', 'ab')
# positions: 1 2
# lengths: 1 1
gsub('a*|b', '.', 'ab')
# ..
where the pattern matches any number of 'a's or one b, and replaces the
match with a dot, globally. the answer is correct (assuming a dfa
engine).
2010 Jul 20
3
[LLVMdev] gold and debug information
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Rafael Espindola <espindola at google.com>wrote:
> > export PATH="$LLVMPREFIX/bin:$LLVMGCCPREFIX/bin:$PATH"
> > export CC="llvm-gcc -use-gold-plugin -Wl,-plugin-opt=also-emit-llvm"
> > export CXX="llvm-g++ -use-gold-plugin -Wl,-plugin-opt=also-emit-llvm"
> > export RANLIB=/bin/true
> > export
2012 May 23
3
[LLVMdev] problem on clang+gold
Hi there,
I compiled clang+gold using a gcc under path /s/gcc-4.3.1/bin/. Later on
I do configure and make for flex-2.5.35, and the following command is
invoked:
"/path/to/my/gold/ld" --hash-style=gnu --no-add-needed --eh-frame-hdr -m
elf_i386 -dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -o flex
/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../crt1.o
2010 Jul 21
1
[LLVMdev] gold and debug information
On 7/21/2010 1:59 PM, Rafael Espindola wrote:
>> I do not know how to get the ld invocation you need. If this command is not
>> what you need, please tell me how to get the ld invocation.
> Add -Wl,-debug to the llvm-gcc call. That should print the ld command
> line in the end.
1998 Feb 27
1
R-beta: is there a way to get rid of loop?
Here is a programming question. The code I am using is quite slow and I
was wondering if there is a way to get rid of the for loop.
I am dealing with "interaction" in 2x2 table, and am using Edwards's G_I
(Likelihood, p. 194).
I label the cells in the table as follows
stim response
"y" "n" total
--------------------------------
y hit miss nsignal
2023 May 09
1
data.frame with a column containing an array
I think the following may provide a clearer explanation:
subs <- c(1,3)
DFA <- data.frame(id = 1:3)
ar <- array(1:12, c(3,2,2))
## yielding
> ar
, , 1
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 1 4
[2,] 2 5
[3,] 3 6
, , 2
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 7 10
[2,] 8 11
[3,] 9 12
## array subscripting gives
> ar[subs,,]
, , 1
[,1] [,2]
[1,] 1 4
[2,] 3 6
, , 2
2012 Jun 28
3
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator
I missed last 2 commits made by Alexey. Following his advices, I updated
the patch. It should be ok now.
Ivan
On 27/06/2012 21:42, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote:
> Committed in r159281.
>
> -Anshu
>
>
> On 6/26/2012 3:04 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote:
>> Hi Anshu,
>>
>> I don't have commit access. It applies correctly on trunk, I've just
>> checked it.
2004 Mar 08
1
Am failing on making lagged residual after regression
Folks,
I'm most confused in trying to do something that (I thought) out to be
mainstream and straightforward R. :-) Could you please help?
I am doing an ordinary linear regression. My goal is: After a
regression, to make residuals, and make a new variable which is the
lagged residuals (lagged by 1). I will use this variable in a 2nd
stage regression (for an error-correcting model).
This
2023 May 25
1
data.frame with a column containing an array
So is this an expected behavior or is it a bug which should be reported somewhere else?
Thanks!
Georg?
?
?
Gesendet:?Dienstag, 09. Mai 2023 um 19:28 Uhr
Von:?"Bert Gunter" <bgunter.4567 at gmail.com>
An:?"Georg Kindermann" <Georg.Kindermann at gmx.at>
Cc:?"Rui Barradas" <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt>, r-help at r-project.org
Betreff:?Re: [R] data.frame
2006 May 06
2
regular expression change in R version 2.3.0?
The interpretation of regular expressions with repetition
quantifiers in the 'gregexpr' function seems to have changed
between R Version 2.2.0 and 2.3.0. The 'gsub' function, however,
gives the same results in R Versions 2.2.0 and 2.3.0. Below is
an example that demonstrates the version differences of the
'gregexpr' function. I am not sure whether this new behavior
is
2023 May 25
3
data.frame with a column containing an array
I really don't know. I would call it a request for extended capabilities of
[.data.frame, rather than a feature or bug. But maybe wiser heads than mine
who monitor this list can sort it out.
-- Bert
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 8:52?PM Georg Kindermann <Georg.Kindermann at gmx.at>
wrote:
> So is this an expected behavior or is it a bug which should be reported
> somewhere else?
>
2012 Jun 20
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator
> Thanks for reviewing this. I added a top comment for AddInsnClass and
I fixed the violation of column numbers.
Great. Looks good to me.
> IMO, it wil be nice to keep it alive for performance comparisons.
Given the overall performance
> is rather determined by transition searches on the current state, for
small DFA tables may not be a win
> and it may still be the case for
2012 Jun 26
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator
Hi Ivan,
Sorry, I should have been more explicit in my last email. The patch looks
good to me. Please check that it applies on trunk and go ahead and commit.
Thanks
-Anshu
> Hi Anshu,
>
> Just in case you have forgotten this thread ;-). Is this patch ok to
> commit or does it not apply to trunk properly ?
> I can fix it if that's the problem.
>
> Ivan
>
> On
2012 Jun 15
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator
Hi Ivan,
The patch looks good to me. I have a couple of minor comments:
+void State::AddInsnClass(unsigned InsnClass,
Add a top level comment describing the function
+ std::map<State*, std::set<Transition*, ltTransition>, ltState>
stateTransitions;
You should be able to use SmallSet here. Also, this line exceeds 80 columns.
On a related note, is the CachedTable mechanism in
2010 Jul 08
2
strsplit("dia ma", "\\b") splits characterwise
\b is word boundary.
But, unexpectedly, strsplit("dia ma", "\\b") splits character by character.
> strsplit("dia ma", "\\b")
[[1]]
[1] "d" "i" "a" " " "m" "a"
> strsplit("dia ma", "\\b", perl=TRUE)
[[1]]
[1] "d" "i" "a" " "
2006 Nov 07
1
Gregexpr - extract results with lapply
Gregexpr - extract results with lapply
Hello,
I need to extract sequences of three upper case letters in a string. In
other words, in this string:
str <-c("ABC", "this WOUld be gOOD")
The result I'm looking for is ABC WOU OOD.
With gregexpr, I can get the position and length of the sequences
gregexpr('[A-Z]{3}',str,perl=TRUE)
[[1]]
[1] 1
2012 Aug 27
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator
Ivan,
Thanks for working on the patch. It looks good to me except for the
removal of the Transition class:
> (1) Should I completely remove Transition and create a map structure
in State (input, state) to replace them?
Yes, please remove the Transition class and create a map structure in
State instead of TransitionSet.
Thanks
-Anshu
On 8/25/2012 6:42 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote:
> Hi
2012 Jun 25
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator
Hi Anshu,
Just in case you have forgotten this thread ;-). Is this patch ok to
commit or does it not apply to trunk properly ?
I can fix it if that's the problem.
Ivan
On 20/06/2012 19:33, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote:
>
> > Thanks for reviewing this. I added a top comment for AddInsnClass
> and I fixed the violation of column numbers.
>
> Great. Looks good to me.
>
>
2012 Aug 29
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator
On 28/08/2012 00:21, Anshuman Dasgupta wrote:
> Ivan,
>
> Thanks for working on the patch. It looks good to me except for the
> removal of the Transition class:
>
> > (1) Should I completely remove Transition and create a map structure
> in State (input, state) to replace them?
>
> Yes, please remove the Transition class and create a map structure in
> State
2023 May 08
1
data.frame with a column containing an array
Dear list members,
when I create a data.frame containing an array I had expected, that I get a similar result, when subsetting it, like having a matrix in a data.frame. But instead I get only the first element and not all values of the remaining dimensions. Differences are already when creating the data.frame, where I can use `I` in case of a matrix but for an array I am only able to insert it in