similar to: Chunk of text won't show up when compiling Rd file

Hi, I''m searching a metod to do a selection suck as: Select attribute1,attribute2 from table where conditions I know that the "find()" and "find_by_sql" methods takes all the attribute...But i want only attribute1 and attribute2...Can someone tell me if there''s a method that give me this opportunity? Thanks,Ivan. -- Posted via

Hi, I want to do a visualisation of a matrix plot made up of several plots of correlation matrices (using corrplot()). My data is in csv format. Here's an example: id,category,attribute1,attribute2,attribute3,attribute4 661,SCHS,43.2,0,56.5,1 12202,SCHS,161.7,5.7,155,16 1182,SCHS,21.4,0,29,0 1356,SSS, 8.8182,0.1818,10.6667,0.6667 1864,SCHS,443.7273,9.9091,537,46 12360,SOA,6.6364,0,10,0

Hi, So I've been figuring out how to use igraph in R and like it for it's speed and simplicity. Now I have a graph built from an edgelist where vectors have a $name attribute. I have another dataframe with attributes tied to a vector ID, which is the same as the $name attribute of vectors represented in the graph. How can I iterate over the graph by V(g)$name and do

Hello, I have an application that should be able to export a list of users as CSV. So I put Mime::Type.register "text/csv", :csv into my environment.rb, and added this code to my UserController''s index action: format.csv do require ''csv'' CSV::Writer.generate(csv_string = "", '','') do |csv| csv

Hi all, I am trying to implement the functionality of Remember Me. The requirement is that once the user closes the browser after checking the remember me check box, it should return to the login page with username and password fields to be filled into the text boxes and the checkbox button checked, so that there is no need to fill all the fields. I am not able to fill the text boxes with user

Is there callback method for field level? Generally, after_create and after_save will fire at object level. I need to fire some code when the value for the field is changed. I need to call the call back method from observer -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

You are using rsync -a which copies (preserves) the timestamp. Meaning that rsync will copy the file then back-date it to the timestamp of the source file. Most copying tools do not do this though cp's -a does it too. Note that your itemized output says that the timestamp is different meaning that the file has changed since rsync last ran. Without the -a (or the included -t) the

I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre10. I incorporated the latest daemon security fixes, and decided to include a few more minor bug fixes as well. If all goes well, this should be released as 3.0.0 final sometime next week. Please help to test it to ensure that we're ready to go! Send email to the rsync mailing list with your questions, comments, bug reports, etc. You can download the

I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre10. I incorporated the latest daemon security fixes, and decided to include a few more minor bug fixes as well. If all goes well, this should be released as 3.0.0 final sometime next week. Please help to test it to ensure that we're ready to go! Send email to the rsync mailing list with your questions, comments, bug reports, etc. You can download the

hi im new to ruby on rails, and I have a stupid little problem, when i do <%= Class1.find(:first) %> in a view file, it just shows "#" on the website :( how do make it the value in the mySQL table? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on

Hi Kevin, The -a flag in this instance is not back-dating the timestamp of the copied file to the source file. It is modifying it to the time of transfer and leaving it that way. Then any time I rerun that command it always updates the timestamp since it is always making it the time of transfer. I have a source file the has a modification date of 2015 and when I rsync it to day with -a the copied

That isn't how rsync should work with -a. Is something preventing it from backdating the file? What is the filesystem? Can you try copying your 2015 file with cp -a? On 10/9/24 14:56, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > The -a flag in this instance is not back-dating the timestamp of the > copied file to the source file. It is modifying it to the time of > transfer

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 08:11:07AM -0400, Kevin Korb wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > What does --itemize-changes say about these files? > > Also, what is --atimes? Is this the Apple modified rsync for OSX? > > On 03/28/2016 07:51 AM, Albert Berger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > when the daily system backup with rsync is

Hello! We are located in the UK, and we are planning to replace our old pbx with an asterisk based pbx. For outgoing calls our present pbx is connected to three PSTN lines which all have the same number. Internally, the pbx caters for quite a few extensions, and each extension can make outbound phone calls. Our telecom provider (your communications) gives us monthly itemized bills that list

IIUC, the new philosophy of symlink times is that -t preserves them to the extent that they are settable; when they aren't, it's just as if -t wasn't given. But rsync breaks this principle in the following case. Suppose rsync is configured with HAVE_LUTIMES enabled but the lutimes call doesn't actually work (I simulated this via the attached patch). When rsync recreates a

What I want is a client-side log file itemized list of *all* the changes that rsync did on the remote machine. Using "--log-file" doesn't show everything. In particular, --log-file says nothing if the remote directory was populated using hard links from a --link-dest source. Any number of remote links and directories can be created, with no mention of any of it in the log file.

I want to have popup menus and check boxes in my forms to let users select associated objects. In the form I''m working on, the object "belongs_to" another type of object which is selected from a popup menu. The id of the chosen object(s) for association is passed back in the parameter hash, but when rails creates a new object from this parameter hash, I get a

I'm getting an anomalous result from using the itemize command in a documentation file. My usage is something like \itemize{ \item Melvin \item Irving \item Clyde \item Fred } (This was place inside ``\details{ }''.) (Previously I had enclosed the text following each item in braces but that gave even worse results.) The package appears to install OK; i.e. the command R

Dear All, how can I create a list in the \value{} section of an Rd file? The things I have tried: 1. \value{ text text \item more text \item even more } ******* Syntax error: \item in /----- \item more text \item even more\----- 2. \value{ text text \item{more text} \item{even more} } This gives no error or warning, but the manual page looks as -------------------- Value: text text

Dear list, I'm writing Rd files and I'd like to have a list inside the description of an argument: (...) \arguments{ (...) \item{bootmethod}{vector of strings, defining the methods used for resampling. Possible methods: \itemize{ \item{"boot"} {Nonparametric bootstrap (precise behaviour is controlled by parameters \code{bscompare} and