Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "Defining an alias for a generic function and callNextMethod() strange behaviour"
2010 Sep 23
1
strange behaviour of callNextMethod in S4 methods
Hello,
I experienced a strange behaviour of callNextMethod when used in either
initialize or any other S4 function method definition.
Help says callNextMethod calls the next inherited method for the current
function from where it is called with the same actual (non missing)
arguments. This is OK. The problem appears when some formal arguments
(in particular, S4 objects) of this function are
2007 Dec 24
0
callNextMethod() with builtin group methods fails to create proper environment
Hi all,
After all these years, I am finally porting some R-2.3.1-based S4 object
code to R-2.6.1, dealing with all the S4 object system changes that came
in R-2.4.0.
I've run across what appears to be some sort of ommission in the
implementation of callNextMethod() when used with primitives having
group generic methods.
In a stock R-2.6.1 patched (happens to be running on AMD64/RHEL 4, but
2010 Jan 13
1
bug in callNextMethod (PR#14185)
Hi,
there seems to be a possible bug in callNextMethod in conjunction with
the [-operator.
Relevant info, minimal example and sessionInfo follow below:
###############################
setClass("foo", representation = representation(a = "numeric"))
setClass("bar", contains = "foo")
setMethod(
f = "[",
signature =
2003 May 21
1
callNextMethod
Hi,
I don't understand why this code doesn't work (f(b2)):
/////////////////
setClass("B0", representation(b0 = "numeric"))
setClass("B1", representation("B0", b1 = "character"))
setClass("B2", representation("B1", b2 = "logical"))
f <- function(x) class(x)
setMethod("f", "B0",
2010 Jul 20
1
Extract callNextMethod "array" calls "matrix"?
I have a class that extends array and my method for "[" stops with an error:
> setClass("A", contains="array")
[1] "A"
> setMethod("[", "A", function(x, i, j, ..., drop = TRUE) new("A",
callNextMethod()))
[1] "["
> a<-new("A",array(1:12,c(4,3,1)))
> a
An object of class "A"
, , 1
2006 May 11
2
S4 initialize methods, unexpected recursive callNextMethod
Hi,
Given a simple three class hierarchy: A <-- B <-- C
I want to define an initialize method for each class such that when I
call new("C", x=5), the initialize methods for A and B are used to
incrementally build the object.
When I do what seems obvious to me using callNextMethod, I get an
infinite recursion. An example follows...
setClass("A",
2012 Nov 06
2
Question on callNextMethod
I don't understand why I get the following results. I define two classes
'Base' and 'Derived', the latter of which 'contains' the first. I then
define a generic method 'test' and overload it for each of these classes. I
call 'callNextMethod()' in the overload for Derived. From the output, it
appears that the overload for Base gets called twice. Why is
2012 Aug 03
1
Interaction between callNextMethod() and selectMethod()
Hi,
Strange things happen. Here is a simple example:
> setClass("A", contains="integer")
> setMethod("as.matrix", "A", function(x, ...) t(callNextMethod()))
Creating a generic function for ?as.matrix? from package ?base? in
the global environment
[1] "as.matrix"
> a <- new("A", 1:3)
> as.matrix(a)
2007 Mar 04
1
Problem using callNextMethod() in S4
Dear all,
Maybe, I am doing something wrong, but using R-2.5.0 on my Intel-Mac, I
have problems
using function callNextMethod() in method initialize.
I am loading the following code as file "testS4.R":
setClass("baseClass",
representation(myname = "character",
mydir = "character",
"VIRTUAL"),
2010 Apr 25
0
S4 generic and method arguments -- "expanded signature"
Hello R-List,
** This e-mail was initially bounced. Please forgive any duplicates.**
I'm creating a new generic function and 3 associated methods, in
which each of the methods only needs a subset of the arguments
specified in the generic.
So, I create the generic like so (with the signature defaulting to all
of the args) ...
setGeneric(
name="myFunction",
def =
2009 Oct 27
1
How to reduce key strokes when defining S4 classes?
I feel tedious when I define a S4 class and the methods. For each
method, I have to call both setMethod and setGeneric (or both
setReplaceMethod and setGeneric). I would like a more compact grammar
so that I can reduce the key strokes. I'm wondering if there is a
better way available.
setClass(
Class='A',
representation=representation(
x='numeric'
)
2009 Jun 05
2
S4: When is validObject issued? (or why S4 is killing me:( ..
Dear UseRs,
Does anyone know when exactly the validity is checked in S4? Documentation is silent:(.
Here is a small example:
setClass("test1",representation(a="numeric"))
setMethod("initialize","test1",
function(.Object,...){
a<-runif(1) ## here slot "a" is initialized ##
callNextMethod(.Object,a=a,...)
2014 Feb 11
1
getting environment from "top" promise
Hi all,
It seems that there is a use case for obtaining the environment for the
"top" promise. By "top", I mean following the promise chain up the call
stack until hitting a non-promise.
S4 data containers often mimic the API of base R data structures. This
means writing S4 methods for functions that quote their arguments, like
with() and subset(). The methods package
2009 Jun 05
1
S4: Initialization method called during setClass??
Dear UseRs,
A simple class inheritance example:
> setClass("test",representation(a="numeric"))
> setMethod("initialize","test",
function(.Object,x,...){
print("Initialization!!!")
callNextMethod(.Object,a=x,...)
})
> new("test",x=23)
[1] "Initialization!!!"
An
2005 Apr 20
1
callNextMethod()
I have built a sequence of eight S4 classes, each of which inherits
from the previous one but adds extra slots.
I have a corresponding generic function for which I have described
methods for each of these classes in a signature with one other
variable. There are also some ad hoc variable outside the signature
which have different default values for each class.
Each method calls
2011 Dec 09
1
'callNextMethod' in a '[<-' function does not work ?
Hi the list,
I try to use callNextMethod in a setteur ([<-) but it does not work.
Any raison ?
Any other option ?
--- 8< ------------------
### Class B0 ###
setClass("B0" , representation(b0 = "numeric"))
setReplaceMethod("[","B0",function(x,i,j,value){x at b0 <- -value})
a <- new("B0")
a at b0 <- 3
a
a["b0"] <- 3
a
2008 Mar 20
1
setMethod for "["
Hi R-Help,
Please consider the following simple case: I have a class like
setClass("myClass",
representation(x="matrix", y="character"))
and I would like to use the method *"["* for a *myClass* objects (but
changing the default *drop* argument from TRUE to FALSE):
setMethod("[","myClass",
function(x,i,j,...,drop=FALSE)
2009 Jul 15
1
Protection stack overflow
Hi,
> gctorture(TRUE)
> setGeneric("foo", function(x, y) standardGeneric("foo"))
[1] "foo"
> setMethod("foo", c("ANY", "ANY"),
+ function(x, y) cat("calling foo,ANY,ANY method\n")
+ )
Error: protect(): protection stack overflow
Sorry this is something I already reported one week ago here
2011 Mar 11
1
WARNING Undocumented S4 methods 'initialize' - why?
Dear all,
I am just writing the documentation file for S4 class 'QualTreeSet' and
get the following warning with R CMD check:
* checking for missing documentation entries ... WARNING
Undocumented S4 methods:
generic 'initialize' and siglist 'QualTreeSet'
All user-level objects in a package (including S4 classes and methods)
should have documentation entries.
See the
2005 Aug 05
1
S4 generating function
Can someone explain what the problem is when I use the
generating function? And how to get debug() to stop in
the Superclass initialize method?
---- source -----
setClass("Superclass",
representation(id = "character"),
contains = "VIRTUAL")
setMethod("initialize",
signature(.Object = "Superclass"),