similar to: mk5check crashed on Windows

Hi, How would I do this: wgetfile { "$name-$file": url => $url, file => $file, target => $target, options => $options, before => Component["md5check-$name"] } wgetfile { "$name-$md5file": url => $url, file =>

Hi, This bug is hitting me hard on two different clients. In RHGS 3.3 and on glusterfs 3.10.2 on Centos 7.4 in once case I had 59 differences in a total of 203 bricks. I wrote a quick and dirty script to check all ports against the brick file and the running process. #!/bin/bash Host=`uname -n| awk -F"." '{print $1}'` GlusterVol=`ps -eaf | grep /usr/sbin/glusterfsd|

We've a fix in release-3.10 branch which is merged and should be available in the next 3.10 update. On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Mike Hulsman <mike.hulsman at proxy.nl> wrote: > Hi, > > This bug is hitting me hard on two different clients. > In RHGS 3.3 and on glusterfs 3.10.2 on Centos 7.4 > in once case I had 59 differences in a total of 203 bricks. > > I

The tools package is not for users, it's for functions that R uses in installing packages, checking them, etc. If you want a function for users, it would belong in utils. But what's wrong with the digest package? What's the argument that R Core should take this on? Duncan Murdoch On 01/05/2020 5:00 p.m., D?nes T?th wrote: > > AFAIK there is no hashing utility in base R

Perhaps use the digest package? Isn't "R the R packages?" > On May 1, 2020, at 2:00 PM, D?nes T?th <toth.denes at kogentum.hu> wrote: > > > AFAIK there is no hashing utility in base R which can create hash digests of arbitrary R objects. However, as also described by Henrik Bengtsson in [1], we have tools::md5sum() which calculates MD5 hashes of files.

On 5/1/20 11:09 PM, John Mount wrote: > Perhaps use the digest package? Isn't "R the R packages?" I think it is clear that I am aware of the existence of the digest package and also of other packages with similar functionality, e.g. the fastdigest package. (And I actually do use digest as I guess 99% percent of the R developers do at least as an indirect dependency.) The point

AFAIK there is no hashing utility in base R which can create hash digests of arbitrary R objects. However, as also described by Henrik Bengtsson in [1], we have tools::md5sum() which calculates MD5 hashes of files. Calculating hashes of in-memory objects is a very common task in several areas, as demonstrated by the popularity of the 'digest' package (~850.000 downloads/month). Upon

Full_Name: Alexandre Da Costa Version: 1.5.1 OS: Windows NT 4 on Virtual PC 4 Submission from: (NULL) (193.253.191.74) I am using Virtual PC 4.0.2 for every day work. I wanted to try connections of R 1.5.1 to Oracle DataBases. But R is running but is not working at all ! The simple commands end with "no finite arguments" error. See following session:

alright, so i was running a warcraft 2 game; by running it from a file manager, right click, open with wine. the program starts great, when i click on battle net the screen changes to black and white, i cannot do anything without it closing. i then tried to start it from a terminal to get a log of whats going wrong; except when it wont start from a terminal; this is what happens;; mint at mint ~

Gentlemen: I ran a spyware sweep on my computer after installing: 10/07/2005 03:25 PM 27,230,914 R-2.2.0-win32.exe >From the cran website. Spy Sweeper 4.0.3 with the latest definition files found Directory of C:\Program Files\R\R-2.2.0 11/01/2005 09:27 AM 668,938 unins000.exe To have the golden eye signature. This is serious if indeed the uninstall program contains

If md5sum --check did not return an error with a truncated file, then the file was likely broken to start with. I think the chances of a corrupted file generating the same md5sum is close enough to 0 that you will never see it in a life time. Also, you lost me on storing the md5sum value at the begging and the end? On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Dat Head <dathead2 at gmail.com> wrote:

Could someone please tell me what I did wrong to create this message or what I should do to correct this problem? I downloaded 2.1.0 Windows binary and installed into C:/R/rw2010, using the installer. I ran md5check.exe in C:/R/rw2010/bin/ and got "No errors." The problem is this: When I start up Rgui.exe from its shortcut (target= C:\R\rw2010\bin\Rgui.exe --save -sdi, Start in

Great info. I found some descriptions of st5 (md5 fp) and ffp, where I assume that "fp" is just a Taper abbreviation for "fingerprint" - or signature as it's called in the flac header. However, I could not find these utilities or source code. What I found looked like instructions for a gui-based program. I think it would be easier to support Mac if st5 were

hi, i found this explanation of the flac fingerprint somewhere: 'A FLAC Fingerprint is generated only for the audio data portion of the file. (Therefore, changing the filename or the tags or FlacMetadata does not change the fingerprint calculation.) In contrast, an .md5 is generated against the whole file, including header portions.' so i was wondering what advantages it could give me

I suppose everybody who makes a package for the first time thinks "I can change anything!" and then runs into this same question. Has anybody written out information on how a package can override functions in R base in the R 2.14 (mandatory NAMESPACE era)? Suppose I want to alphabetize variables in a summary.data.frame, or return the standard deviation with the mean in summary output.

Hello, Today I installed R for Windows version 2.13.1, but realized that it's not something that I need right now. I attempted to uninstall it, but am getting the following error message: "This Installation can only be uninstalled on 64-bit Windows." I am running Windows XP Professional, Version 2002, SP 3. I've also tried the unins000.exe file as suggested in the help, and

i forgot to ask this important question :) why doesn't a ffp file make a md5 of the *whole* flac file, so that all non-audio data inside the file are verified too? in my opinion, now it only does the same as the internally stored md5 on the decompressed audio data, but there is still no way to verify the header of the flac file (so i mean : all non-audio data in the file) or am i forgotting

Harry, > so i was wondering what advantages it could give me to make a ffp > file, because there is already a internally stored md5 checksum on the > decoded audio data inside the flac file? Testing the .flac file against its internally stored fingerprint lets you know that you have a properly encoded .flac file of *something*. If you also certify that internally stored fingerprint

shntool (http://etree.org/shnutils/, http://shnutils.freeshell.org/) is Windows-only, but the source is available. > Great info. I found some descriptions of st5 (md5 fp) and ffp, where I > assume that "fp" is just a Taper abbreviation for "fingerprint" - or > signature as it's called in the flac header. However, I could not find > these utilities or source

I'm sorry to waste bandwidth. I re-read the console message for the tenth time and finally noticed R was looking in rw2001pat for libraries. Looking at my Env vars I see I set R_LIBS to look there. Changed R_LIBS, fixed problem. DOH! So now if I want to use several versions of R simultaneously, what do I do. I set R_LIBS so it would look also in C:/R/extra for some added packages. Thanks and