similar to: r-base build: failure to convert R-FAQ to pdf

Hello. I am in a habit of compiling daily snapshots of R-devel and R-patched on my Windows XP workstation. I have cygwin environment with up-to-date RTools and MiKTeX. I run cygwin and MiKTeX upadaters pretty often (every couple of days) so both of them are reasonably current. Recently I noticed a small annoyance when compiling R-dvel. It started happening right after I updated to the new

I just installed R-1.7.0 on Darwin 6.6 (a.k.a. MacOS 10.2.6). 'make' and 'make check' run without any problems. 'make info' builds with no complaints, but 'make dvi' and 'make pdf' fail. I get refman.dvi and refman.pdf OK (with some warnings from pdftex that some names are referenced that do not exist), but R-FAQ.{dvi,pdf} fails as shown below. Attempts

I am trying to compile the R-dev sources on WinXP using mingw 3.1.0-1 and fpTeX 0.7. In the past I have been able to build the sources fine but now I receive an error in the process that I havent seen reported on the list before. Everything works fine until I get to 'make docs'. I now get the message below while building the R-admin manual (refman.pdf builds fine) and the make process

For the little C test program where a constant is stored in memory and also used as a parameter: #include <stdint.h> uint64_t val, *p; extern uint64_t xtr( uint64_t); uint64_t caller() { uint64_t x; p = &val; x = 12345123400L; *p = x; return xtr(x); } clang (3.2, 3.3 and svn) generates the following X86 code (at -O3): caller: movq

Dear R developers, I had some problem when building package: for exemple when building the package e1071 available from CRAN, I get the following message error: * checking for file 'e1071/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * preparing 'e1071': * cleaning src * running cleanup * creating vignettes ... ERROR /usr/lib/R/bin/texi2dvi: pdflatex exited with bad status, quitting.

This patch adds proper delays to maxwell exa shaders. rendercheck tests seem consistent with/without this patch. I haven't extensively tested them though. Trello: https://trello.com/c/6LPB2EIS/174-update-maxwell-shaders-with-proper-delays Signed-off-by: Aaryaman Vasishta <jem456.vasishta at gmail.com> --- src/shader/exac8nv110.fp | 10 +++++----- src/shader/exac8nv110.fpc | 18

v2: Add missing delays This patch adds proper delays to maxwell exa shaders. rendercheck tests seem consistent with/without this patch. I haven't extensively tested them though. Trello: https://trello.com/c/6LPB2EIS/174-update-maxwell-shaders-with-proper-delays Signed-off-by: Aaryaman Vasishta <jem456.vasishta at gmail.com> --- src/shader/exac8nv110.fp | 10 +++++-----

Hi, On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > BTW, you can drop those explicit "depbar" ops. I think they're only > needed when you're doing something weird with barriers. Blob doesn't > use them (anymore) > Gotcha. Should I remove them in the same patch or a different one? It seems like the depbar removal is

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote: > Nice work! > > See my comments below, and double-check if some of them can be applied to > the shaders I didn't review yet. > > I recommend you to test your work because if one sched code is wrong, you > are likely going to kill your card and reboot your box. :-) > > >

Removed explicit depar instructions as they're not used by the blob anymore. Signed-off-by: Aaryaman Vasishta <jem456.vasishta at gmail.com> --- src/shader/exac8nv110.fp | 5 ++--- src/shader/exac8nv110.fpc | 10 ++++------ src/shader/exacanv110.fp | 5 ++--- src/shader/exacanv110.fpc | 10 ++++------ src/shader/exacmnv110.fp | 5 ++--- src/shader/exacmnv110.fpc | 10 ++++------

On 06/10/2017 09:14 AM, Aaryaman Vasishta wrote: > See the 'wt' on the first fmul in exacanv110.fp, exacmnv110.fp and > exasanv110.fp. Any ideas on what could be causing the first fmul to > require $r0 and/or $r1? 'tex nodep $r4 $r2 0x0 0x1 t2d 0xf' is actually: 'tex nodep $r4:$r7 $r2 0x0 0x1 t2d 0xf' Very confusing, I know. > > Cheers, > Aaryaman

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/07/2017 06:58 PM, Aaryaman Vasishta wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Samuel Pitoiset < >> samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com <mailto:samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Nice work! >> >> See my

Sorry for the late response, been busy with some personal stuff + work... On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Samuel Pitoiset > <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 06/10/2017 09:14 AM, Aaryaman Vasishta wrote: > >> > >> See the 'wt' on the

v4: Updated the wait dependancy bars based on tex component masks. This patch adds proper delays to maxwell exa shaders. Tested with rendercheck -f a8r8g8b8. I am still wondering whether the rd's are required. We could still wait on the write bars instead. eg. see "sched (st 0xf wr 0x1 wt 0x2) (st 0xf wr 0x1 wt 0x2) (st 0xf)" in exacmnv110.fp Trello:

> I expected that this optimization would be picked > up in a cse, gvn, machine-cse or even peepholing pass. > > Comments? At the LLVM IR level this is represented as define i64 @caller() #0 { entry: store i64* @val, i64** @p, align 8, !tbaa !0 store i64 12345123400, i64* @val, align 8, !tbaa !3 %call = tail call i64 @xtr(i64 12345123400) #2 ret i64 %call } Which is

Full_Name: Martin O'Gorman Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (84.176.63.149) I have been looking at the PPC package and have a question. As the input data is comma separated, shouldn?t the command to read in the raw (no batch) mass spec data indicate that sep=?,? (marked below) ? Otherwise, the data read in is the pair of values (m/z,intensity). It is not obvious why that should be.

Hi Everybody, i again have the problem in using tune.knn(), its giving an error saying missing values are not allowed.... again here is the script for BreastCancer Data, library(e1071) library(mda) trdata<-data.frame(train,row.names=NULL) attach(trdata) xtr <- subset(trdata, select = -Class) ytr <- Class bestpara <-tune.knn(xtr,ytr, k = 1:25, tunecontrol = tune.control(sampling

Dear all, I was wondering if you could help me with the following. I want to do calculate this equation: Ps(t)= (?_(r=1)^N Xtr* 1/?drs)/(?_(r=1)^N 1/?drs) Ps(t) ? Probability that taxon t will occur at site s (300 sites s) N ? Number of sites = from 1 to 49 Xtr ? Value for taxon t at site r (I have this information in a table, 40 taxa (columns) t, 49 sites r) drs ? Distance from site r to

On Aug 2, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> I expected that this optimization would be picked >> up in a cse, gvn, machine-cse or even peepholing pass. >> >> Comments? > > > At the LLVM IR level this is represented as > > define i64 @caller() #0 { > entry: > store i64* @val, i64** @p, align 8, !tbaa

G'day all, after issuing `svn up' on my machine this morning, I noticed that `make info' choked on R-exts.texi. Below is a patch that seems to solve the problem. BTW, while `make info' runs now, I still get the following warning: /usr/bin/makeinfo --enable-encoding -D UseExternalXrefs -I/opt/src/R-devel-src/doc/manual /opt/src/R-devel-src/doc/manual/R-exts.texi