Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "(PR#11281) Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines"
2008 May 13
2
(PR#11281) Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!)
>>>>> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk>
>>>>> on Tue, 13 May 2008 07:32:43 +0100 (BST) writes:
BDR> This example does not crash in R 2.7.0, R-patched nor
BDR> R-devel (r45677) for me (x86_64 F8 Linux.) It also
BDR> does not crash with the CRAN build of R 2.7.0 on
BDR> Windows XP.
Neither does it
2008 May 10
1
(PR#11281) Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed
You will see the current code is different, and your 'fix' is not needed
nor applies in R-devel.
You failed to provide an example to reproduce the alleged bug, but the
issue does seem to be using lines beyond the documented line length.
So it would have only affected people who did that ....
And generating a new report (PR#11438) was distinctly unfriendly.
If after studing the R FAQ
2008 Apr 25
2
Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11281)
OK, I am just sending it here too as it looks like r-devel at r-project.org
is not the right place:
=EF=BB=BFOn Fri, 2008-04-25 at 08:48 +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> While trying to fix swig & R2.7 I actually discovered that there is a
> bug in R 2.7 causing a crash (so R & swig might actually work):
>=20
> the bug is in ./src/main/gram.c line 3038:
>=20
>
2008 Apr 25
1
Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines
While trying to fix swig & R2.7 I actually discovered that there is a
bug in R 2.7 causing a crash (so R & swig might actually work):
the bug is in ./src/main/gram.c line 3038:
} else { /* over-long line */
fixthis --> char *LongLine = (char *) malloc(nc);
if(!LongLine)
error(_("unable to allocate space for source line %d"),
2008 May 10
0
Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11438)
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:38 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> bugreports at nn7.de wrote:
> > OK, I am just sending it here too as it looks like r-devel at r-project.org
> > is not the right place:
> >
> I think it was seen there too, just that noone got around to reply. In
> R-bugs, there's a filing system so that it won't be completely forgotten...
Looks like
2008 Apr 18
1
swig 1.3.35 & R - is the R wrapper still maintained and of interest?
Dear all,
I was trying to use the R swig wrapper with R 2.7 and shogun
( http://www.shogun-toolbox.org ) but it fails completely, as in doesn't
even compile and even after patching then though compiling - crashes...
So I asked on swig-users/swig-devel CC'ing the potential R maintainer
but I never received a reply. I now wonder if anyone here could help or
would be willing to maintain
2008 May 07
6
help with updating to R2.7
Hi,
From R 2.6, I would like to update to R2.7. I would like to have some tips on the recommended method of installing the latest versions of an entire list of packages in R2.7 - i.e. all the packages that I have presently installed in R2.6.
I am hoping that there is an easier method than fetching the packages individually as I did, to begin with, for R2.6.
Additionally, I would like to install
2008 Apr 26
0
Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11284)
bugreports at nn7.de wrote:
> OK, I am just sending it here too as it looks like r-devel at r-project.or=
g
> is not the right place:
> =20
I think it was seen there too, just that noone got around to reply. In=20
R-bugs, there's a filing system so that it won't be completely forgotten.=
=2E.
However, your mail seems to have gotten encoded in quoted-printable, you =
might want
2008 May 13
0
Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11456)
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 11:10 +0200, maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch wrote:
> Hi Soeren,
> >>>>> "SS" == Soeren Sonnenburg <bugreports at nn7.de>
> >>>>> on Sat, 10 May 2008 05:32:14 +0000 writes:
>
> SS> On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:38 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> >> bugreports at nn7.de wrote: > OK, I am just
2015 May 31
4
Re: [ovirt-users] Bug in Snapshot Removing
Small addition again:
This error shows up in the log while removing snapshots WITHOUT rendering the Vms unresponsive
—
Jun 01 01:33:45 mc-dc3ham-compute-02-live.mc.mcon.net libvirtd[1657]: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock
Jun 01 01:33:45 mc-dc3ham-compute-02-live.mc.mcon.net vdsm[6839]: vdsm vm.Vm ERROR vmId=`56848f4a-cd73-4eda-bf79-7eb80ae569a9`::Error getting block
2015 Jun 02
2
Re: [ovirt-users] Bug in Snapshot Removing
Hello Soeren.
I've started to look at this issue and I'd agree that at first glance
it looks like a libvirt issue. The 'cannot acquire state change lock'
messages suggest a locking bug or severe contention at least. To help
me better understand the problem I have a few questions about your
setup.
>From your earlier report it appears that you have 15 VMs running on
the
2015 Jun 04
2
Re: [ovirt-users] Bug in Snapshot Removing
Hi,
I would send those, but unfortunately we did not think about the journals
getting deleted after a reboot.
I just made the journals persistent on the servers, we are trying to
trigger the error again last time we only got half way through the VM’s
when removing the snapshots so we have a good chance that it comes up
again.
Also the libvirt logs to the journal not to libvirtd.log, i would
2015 Jun 04
2
Re: [ovirt-users] Bug in Snapshot Removing
Hi Adam, Hi Eric,
We had this issue again a few minutes ago.
One machine went down exactly the same way as described, the machine had
only one snapshot and it was the only snapshot that was removed, before
that in the same scriptrun we deleted the snapshots of 15 other Vms, some
without, some with 1 and some with several snapshots.
Can i provide anything from the logs that helps ?
Regards
2011 Aug 07
1
fail to correctly build 1.8.5 ??
Hello everybody,
I've been using asterisk 1.2 for quite a long time now, but I thought
it's time to try a newer version of asterisk.
So I downloaded 1.8.5, extracted the tar, ran configure, make, make
install ...
Everything looks fine (no obvious compile/link errors).
But as soon as I start asterisk, it dies with a segfault.
I executed asterisk within strace and last action before the
2007 Oct 26
1
Use of all/any
all/any coerce their arguments to logical (if possible). I've added a
warning in R-devel if coercion is from something other than integer.
This arose because it is easy to make a slip and write all(X) > 0 rather
than all(X > 0): thanks to Bill Dunlap for bringing that to my attention.
However, it has been useful in detecting quite a few other things:
- indices which had been made
2005 Apr 17
3
RFC: hexadecimal constants and decimal points
These are some points stimulated by reading about C history (and
related in their implementation).
1) On some platforms
> as.integer("0xA")
[1] 10
but not all (not on Solaris nor Windows). We do not define what is
allowed, and rely on the OS's implementation of strtod (yes, not strtol).
It seems that glibc does allow hex: C99 mandates it but C89 seems not to
allow it.
I
2004 May 12
4
points(*, pch=NA) does *not* not draw the point (PR#6876)
We say in ?points that 'pch' (among others) can be set to NA
for omitting a point.
While this works in cases where there's at least one point left
to draw, it fails in a simple case like this :
> plot(1, pch = NA)
Error in plot.xy(xy.coords(x, y), type = type, pch = pch, col = col, bg = bg, :
invalid plotting symbol
Both in R-patched or R-devel.
A simple workaround {hinting
2007 Dec 29
2
(PR#10534 capture.output(), truncated last output without
This only happens if 'file' is a text connection, and is the expected
behaviour in that case: you cannot capture an incomplete line to a text
connection.
There seems no reason to break the documented behaviour in other cases to
change something that you consider to a bug when file=NULL and the user
does not produce complete output. It would be possible to make use of
isIncomplete()
2001 Dec 27
1
scale in stars() is not as documented (PR#1230)
R 1.4.0
?stars has
scale: logical flag: if `TRUE', the columns of the data matrix are
scaled independently so that the maximum value in each column
is 1 and the minimum is 0. If `FALSE', the presumption is
that the data have been scaled by some other algorithm to the
range [0,1].
but the code has
if (scale) {
x <- sweep(x, 2,
1999 Jul 15
1
which() does not handle NAs in named vectors. (PR#226)
Version:
platform = sparc-sun-solaris2.6
arch = sparc
os = solaris2.6
system = sparc, solaris2.6
status =
status.rev = 0
major = 0
minor = 64.2
year = 1999
month = July
day = 3
language = R
-- It is unclear to me that the handling of NAs is desirable, and it
has problems with names:
> z <- c(T,T,NA,F,T)
> names(z) <- letters[1:5]
> which(z)
Error: names attribute