Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Windows binary packages & R-Forge"
2008 Mar 18
0
Rmetrics - R-Forge - Workshop
Dear Members of the R-Core Team,
Rmetrics Developers, and Rmetrics
Users ...
The repository of the development version
of the Rmetrics software environment has
been moved to R-forge.
The new R-Forge framework for R-project
developers based on GForge offers us easy
access to SVN, daily built and checked
packages, mailing lists, bug tracking,
2008 May 21
3
Problem with R or fBasics Package (PR#11495)
I have a problem wirh R: After loding fBasics packages log funtion doesn't
work like as fallow:
Cenap ERDEMIR
Hacettepe University
Turkey
> log(20)
[1] 2.995732
> local({pkg <- select.list(sort(.packages(all.available = TRUE)))
+ if(nchar(pkg)) library(pkg, character.only=TRUE)})
Loading required package: fImport
Loading required package: fSeries
Loading required package: robustbase
2008 Jun 12
1
The log function problem
Hi R,
Please see the below commands. The question is I can see the value of
log(2) before loading the package fcalendar in R. But after loading the
package, the 'log' function doesn't work. How to solve this problem?
Also note that the function code differs before and after downloading
the packages.
> log
function (x, base = exp(1)) .Primitive("log")
>
2010 May 26
0
R/Rmetrics Meielisalp Summer School and User/Developer Workshop 2010
Computational Finance and Financial Engineering
1st R/Rmetrics Summer School and 4th User/Developer Meeting
Meielisalp, Lake Thune Switzerland, June 27 - July 1, 2010
Late Registration: https://www.rmetrics.org/meielisalp2010-registration
Students: Apply for Student Scholarships
www.rmetrics.org
*** Rmetrics 2010 - Don't miss it ! ***
2008 Jun 02
1
Help : R-packages : Problems loading package fSeries
Hi.
I am trying to load the package fSeries, in order to load the package
fGarch after.
However, it says the following message.
> local({pkg <- select.list(sort(.packages(all.available = TRUE)))
+ if(nchar(pkg)) library(pkg, character.only=TRUE)})
Loading required package: fBasics (Error : ... infinite recursion)
Loading required package: fImport
Loading required package: fSeries
Loading
2017 Nov 02
2
"prob" package alternative
The issue is fAsianOptions. Is there a version that works with the latest
version of R? If not, which version of it works with which version of R and
where can it be found? I tried several at the archive already.
Alternatively, is there another package that behaves similarly to prob?
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:17 PM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net>
wrote:
>
> > On Nov
2017 Nov 02
2
"prob" package alternative
Yes. That's the version I've been discussing that has non-zero exit status.
That situation is why CRAN retired the prob package. It's possible you
installed that library earlier in development and it's been "carried"
along. It no longer installs, now.
The problems with all of this seem to have started this month according to
the conversations. However, no one has
2008 Apr 30
2
fCopulae
Hello,
Hela wrote :
My problem in a few words is as folow:
I used the fCopulae packages because i have 2 series which are already
transformed in the uniform domain (the space of the copulas functions) and i
estimated with type archmList() from 1 to 22, but i don't know their
names:for exemple the type=4 is the Gumbel Copula...and for the others i
can't have any idea about how can i find
2017 Nov 02
0
"prob" package alternative
> On Nov 2, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Tiby Kantrowitz <tlkantro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The issue is fAsianOptions. Is there a version that works with the latest version of R? If not, which version of it works with which version of R and where can it be found? I tried several at the archive already.
sessionInfo()
R version 3.4.2 Patched (2017-10-04 r73465)
Platform:
2017 Nov 02
2
"prob" package alternative
Yes, that is exactly what I was doing two days ago.
Warning in install.packages :
installation of package ?fAsianOptions_3010.79.tar.gz? had non-zero exit
status
Which is what a reading of the explanation for why "prob" was retired leads
one to expect. Do you have some other suggestion about how to get it to
work? I notice you're not using Windows which might have a relationship
2017 Nov 02
2
"prob" package alternative
Rtools is not available for the current version of R.
What I'm looking for is an alternative package or how others have managed
to create workarounds.
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:25 PM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net>
wrote:
>
> > On Nov 2, 2017, at 1:09 PM, Tiby Kantrowitz <tlkantro at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, that is exactly what I was doing
2017 Nov 02
0
"prob" package alternative
> On Nov 2, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Tiby Kantrowitz <tlkantro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes. That's the version I've been discussing that has non-zero exit status. That situation is why CRAN retired the prob package. It's possible you installed that library earlier in development and it's been "carried" along. It no longer installs, now.
>
> The problems
2017 Nov 02
0
"prob" package alternative
> On Nov 2, 2017, at 1:09 PM, Tiby Kantrowitz <tlkantro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, that is exactly what I was doing two days ago.
>
> Warning in install.packages :
> installation of package ?fAsianOptions_3010.79.tar.gz? had non-zero exit status
>
> Which is what a reading of the explanation for why "prob" was retired leads one to expect. Do you have
2017 Nov 02
2
"prob" package alternative
Thanks. I found that, and installed it and got the same message. Here:
RTools version 3.4
install.packages("fAsianOptions_3010.tar.gz", dependencies=TRUE,
repos=NULL, type = "source")
Installing package into ?C:/Users/Tlk7/Documents/R/win-library/3.4? (as
?lib? is unspecified) Warning: invalid package 'fAsianOptions_3010.tar.gz'
Error: ERROR: no packages specified
2017 Nov 02
0
"prob" package alternative
> On Nov 2, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Tiby Kantrowitz <tlkantro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Rtools is not available for the current version of R.
Really? If true, I'm surprised and not able to help. I do see an Rtools34.exe at https://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/Rtools/
--
David.
>
> What I'm looking for is an alternative package or how others have managed to create
2017 Nov 02
0
"prob" package alternative
> On Nov 2, 2017, at 3:46 PM, Tiby Kantrowitz <tlkantro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks. I found that, and installed it and got the same message. Here:
>
> RTools version 3.4
>
> install.packages("fAsianOptions_3010.tar.gz",
I don't see a path to that file's location.
The expansion from pkg_version.tar.gz might be automatic, but I do generally
2008 Jun 11
0
ETH Internship - Dynamic Portfolio Asset Allocation
Summer Internship at ETH Zurich
"Dynamic Portfolio Asset Allocation"
We offer a 3-months internship starting
midth July 2008. The topic addresses
"Dynamic Portfolio Asset Allocation"
including alternative instruments and
hedge funds. The goal will be to compare
the robust mean-variance, the lower partial
moment and the conditional value-at-risk
approaches for portfolio
2009 Sep 30
1
Re cursive regression
Hi there, I'm in desperate need to figure out how to solve this issue.
I need to estimate a recursive model for a time series data of asset
returns. The dependent variable is the asset return and then I have a set of
k variables, a lagged value of the dependent variable (plus an intercept) as
regressors. My sample period (monthly observations) starts on Jan 1972. What
I need to do is the
2008 May 27
2
sort - Windows and Linux
Dear all,
While debugging a function I realized that
sort(c(" 1", " 2", "10"))
do not give the same result on Windows and Linux.
This is actually not surprising because white spaces are not handle in
the same manner on these two platforms. But I was wondering if this
behavior is also desired in R.
regards,
Yohan Chalabi
2008 Feb 04
1
garchFit (PR#10698)
Full_Name: Scott Yonker
Version: R for OSX Cocoa
OS: Mac OSX
Submission from: (NULL) (24.208.185.211)
The garchFit function in the Rmetrics libray cannot estimate ARCH models,
meaning that the number of beta terms in the model must be greater than zero.
For this function neither p nor q can be set to zero without an error. The
problem lies in both the specification of the objective function