similar to: (PR#11054) "Writing R Extensions": bad example with CAR /

Full_Name: Simon Anders Version: 2.6.2 OS: Ubuntu Linux Submission from: (NULL) (86.22.75.91) This is a rather minor "documentation bug", certainly not at all urgent. The manual "Writing R extensions" explains in section 5.10 ("Evaluating R expressions from C") how to use the eval function. Without going into much details, an example is given how to build up a

Dear Prof Ripley, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > But it is not taken 'verbatim from src/main/print.c' (at least not in > that version of R), and the code is not run with USE_RINTERNALS defined > when write-barrier checking is enabled. > > The example has been updated to match the current code in 2.7.0 alpha. I just assumed that it is copied verbatim without checking because

I found a bug in one of the fourteen speed patches I posted, namely in patch-vec-subset. I've fixed this (I now see one does need to duplicate index vectors sometimes, though one can avoid it most of the time). I also split this patch in two, since it really has two different and independent parts. The patch-vec-subset patch now has only some straightforward (locally-checkable) speedups for

>>>>> Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> >>>>> on Fri, 3 Mar 2017 00:52:16 -0800 writes: > I'd like to propose that the whenever the length of condition passed > to an if or a while statement differs from one, an error is produced > rather than just a warning as today: >> x <- 1:2 >> if (x == 1)

Hi, I'm writing a C function that has to call a R function with multiple arguments. I've read the relevant section in Writing R Extensions, and searched the R site, mailing lists as well as rseek. I managed to call the function, but I'm now having trouble creating the argument list. I tried to create a pairlist of the arguments and send it to the R function. The R function however

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>> Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> >>>>>> on Fri, 3 Mar 2017 00:52:16 -0800 writes: > > > I'd like to propose that the whenever the length of condition passed > > to an if or a while statement differs from one, an

Hi all, I have a problem of Rf_initEmbeddedR function. I've tried with: try { int Argc1 = 1; char *Argv1[] = {"Rtest_1"}; int Argc2 = 1; char *Argv2[] = {"Rtest_2"}; // Init R(first) Rf_initEmbeddedR(Argc1, Argv1); // R package load SEXP e = R_NilValue; SEXP r = R_NilValue; PROTECT(e =

I'd like to propose that the whenever the length of condition passed to an if or a while statement differs from one, an error is produced rather than just a warning as today: > x <- 1:2 > if (x == 1) message("x == 1") x == 1 Warning message: In if (x == 1) message("x == 1") : the condition has length > 1 and only the first element will be used There are

Hello, I am new to this list. ?I am trying to compile the current svn version of kdeedu on an amd64 linux machine ?which uses R and I get the following compiler output. ------------------------------------------- ?79%] Building CXX object cantor/src/backends/R/rserver/CMakeFiles/cantor_rserver.dir/rserver.o $SOURCES/kdeedu/cantor/src/backends/R/rserver/rserver.cpp: In member function

Dear list, I am trying to implement a publish-subscribe mechanism in for an embedded R interpreter. But somehow my registered closures seem to get collected by the GC, even though I have protected them. I have reducted my code to the following sample. Sorry if it is a little verbose. The first couple of call of calls still work, but at some point one of the callbacks (callback1 in my

Hi , I am trying to call head function from C . My doubt is with the parameter n,how to pass it . PROTECT(dfm=lang3(install("data.frame"),df,ScalarLogical(FALSE))); SET_TAG(CDDR(dfm), install("stringsAsFactors")) ; SEXP res = PROTECT(eval(dfm,R_GlobalEnv)); PROTECT(head=lang3(install("head"),res,ScalarInteger(1))); head = PROTECT(eval(head,R_GlobalEnv)); I tried

I was thrilled to see this in the change log: > match.call() gains an envir argument for specifying the environment from which to retrieve the ... in the call, if any; this environment was wrong (or at least undesirable) when the definition argument was a function. This was an issue I ran into a few years ago.? I ended up writing my own version that allows specification of the environment, but

Simon, Ah, thank you! quiet right. For anyone searching for this in the future, I changed my init fuction to: ---------- SNIP ---------------- void init_r() { SEXP aperm_function; /* this is our version of Rf_initEmbeddedR where we disable stack checking */ const char *init_argv[] = {"MyFront", "--vanilla", "--slave"}; Rf_initialize_R(sizeof

On 6/30/20 1:06 PM, Jan Gorecki wrote: > It is quite known that R documentation on R C api could be improved... Please see "5.11 Evaluating R expressions from C" from "Writing R Extensions" Best Tomas > Still R-package-devel mailing list should be preferred for this kind > of questions. > Not sure if that is the best way, but works. > > call_to_sum <-

It is quite known that R documentation on R C api could be improved... Still R-package-devel mailing list should be preferred for this kind of questions. Not sure if that is the best way, but works. call_to_sum <- inline::cfunction( language = "C", sig = c(x = "SEXP"), body = " SEXP e = PROTECT(lang2(install(\"sum\"), x)); SEXP r_true =

Thanks Jan and Tomas for the feedback. Answer from Jan is what I am looking for. Maybe I am not looking in the right place buy it is not easy to understand how these LCONS, CONS, SETCDR...etc works. Thank you Best regards Morgan On Tue, 30 Jun 2020, 12:36 Tomas Kalibera, <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/30/20 1:06 PM, Jan Gorecki wrote: > > It is quite known that R

Hello folks, I'm embarking on a project to embed R into the Apache web server, and I'd like your help. Currently, I'm looking for a way for R code to call back into a shared library from which the R shared library was loaded. Essentially, apache starts and loads mod_R.so which runs an initialization routine which calls Rf_initEmbeddedR() and the following code: /* override to

Hi all, it seems that from R 4.0.1 EXTPTR_PTR can be either a macro or a function, depending on whether USE_RINTERNALS is requested. Jeroen helped me find that this was in 78592: https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/c634fec5214e73747b44d7c0e6f047fefe44667d This is a problem, because binary packages that are built on R 4.0.1 or R 4.0.2 will potentially not load on R 4.0.0, if they use the

I have tried to compile this from source. I don't know what Endianess is, but it is probably not debian power pc. Am I would of luck with this package? Stephen Sefick * Installing *source* package ?ifultools? ... ** libs gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/local/lib/R/include -I"../inst/include/" -D"MUTIL_STATIC" -D"DEF_TF" -D"INTERRUPT_ENABLE"

Hi all I recently started to write a matrix exponentiation operator for R (by adding a new operator definition to names.c, and adding the following code to arrays.c). It is not finished yet, but I would like to solicit some comments, as there are a few areas of R's internals that I am still feeling my way around. Firstly: 1) Would there be interest in adding a new operator %^% that performs