similar to: ambiguous example in as.Date() documentation (PR#10990)

here appears to be a bug in the foreign library. The following code used to work, but now generates an error when 'package="SAS"' is specified: ds <- read.csv("http://www.math.smith.edu/sasr/datasets/help.csv") # running foreign package version 0.8-30 library(foreign) # this works fine write.foreign(ds, "foo", "bar", package="Stata") #

The pmatch help (see also section 4.3.2 in the R Language Definition) claims that pmatch with duplicates.ok=FALSE provides the same functionality as R's argument matching algorithm, modulo how empty strings are matched. Here's an undocumented inconsistency between pmatch and R's argument matching algorithm: > sessionInfo() R version 3.0.1 (2013-05-16) Platform:

Under ?data package: a character vector giving the package(s) to look in for data sets, or 'NULL'. By default, all packages in the search path are used, then the 'data' subdirectory (if present) of the current working directory. which I think is accurate -- packages have to be attached for their data to be found; being loaded (as

Full_Name: Tobias Verbeke Version: 2.1.0 OS: GNU/Linux Submission from: (NULL) (81.247.252.229) Would it be possible to use a non-ambiguous example of expressing a day according to the ISO 8601 international standard in the first sentence of the Note section of ?strptime, e.g. "2001-04-18" instead of "2001-02-03" ? Yours, Tobias

Hi, In the situation below the note issued by the dispatch algo doesn't seem right: setClass("A", representation(stuff="complex")) setAs("ANY", "A", function(from) new("A", stuff=as.complex(from))) > as(6, "A") An object of class "A" Slot "stuff": [1] 6+0i > as(6L, "A")

> > > The algorithm maintains a may-point-to graph. Unfortunately the > algorithm > > doesn't delete an "A-->B" edge when there's a strong update of "A" but > the > > value copied into "A" isn't a pointer. So the interpretation of "A" > having > > only one outbound edge (to "B") is a little

Hi all, I'm playing around with implementing an existing non-LLVM AA algorithm as an LLVM AA pass. I'm looking for suggestions for getting it to fit in AliasAnalysis's worldview, so that it might eventually be a candidate for inclusion in LLVM. The algorithm maintains a may-point-to graph. Unfortunately the algorithm doesn't delete an "A-->B" edge when there's

Not sure if this is an R or BioC question so will cross-post. I cannot extract R code from vignettes because system.file("doc", "my.bioc.package") returns "". I got this code directly off of http://www.bioconductor.org/docs/vignettes.html. A specific example using siggenes follows but I have tested this using multiple packages, including those for which I can

Is there anywhere that I can download the Ruby/Rails documentation & APIs so I can peruse it offline at leisure? I only have a dialup connection at home and going online all the time to access important documentation like that is a bit of a pain. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

>>>>> Jennifer Lyon <jennifer.s.lyon at gmail.com> >>>>> on Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:33:30 -0700 writes: > On the documentation page for DateTimeClasses, in the Examples section, > there are the following two lines: > > format(.leap.seconds) # the leap seconds in your time zone > print(.leap.seconds, tz = "PST8PDT") # and in

Hi all, I''ve got an issue where i have a search page that passes a field which is then used as the criteria of the search. Problem is, I''ve set an AR has_many relationship in the model that joins one table to another - both tables have the same column name I''m searching on, so naturally I get an ambiguous error in sql - it doesnt know which column to apply the search

I've hit a problem in ggplot2 which I can trace back to cut.Date , which is either a bug or (??) ggplot2 trying to do something it shouldn't with cut.Date (although its use of cut.Date seems OK). Apparently any (?) call of the form cut(as.Date("2008-07-07"),"weeks") where the date *begins the week*, gives the error Error in 1:(1 + max(which(breaks < maxx))) :

Hi, I am trying out the cucumber tutorial http://www.ultrasaurus.com/sarahblog/2008/12/rails-2-day-3-behavior-driven-development/ My tasklist.feature file is like as follows " Feature: Tasks In order to keep track of tasks People should be able to Create a list of tasks Scenario: List Tasks Given that I have created a task "task 1" When I go to the tasks page Then I should see

Hi all! I've got this error while running example(Glm) library("rms") > example(Glm) Glm> ## Dobson (1990) Page 93: Randomized Controlled Trial : Glm> counts <- c(18,17,15,20,10,20,25,13,12) Glm> outcome <- gl(3,1,9) Glm> treatment <- gl(3,3) Glm> f <- glm(counts ~ outcome + treatment, family=poisson()) Glm> f Call: glm(formula = counts ~

I'm trying to understand why as.Date() is converting a the modified date of a file from August 22 to August 23. > foo <- file.info(file.to.process) > str(foo) 'data.frame': 1 obs. of 10 variables: $ size : num 5.37e+09 $ isdir : logi FALSE $ mode :Class 'octmode' int 436 $ mtime : POSIXct, format: "2010-08-22 23:14:52" $ ctime : POSIXct, format:

Hey all, I get a warning about an unsupported file type in the data directory during R CMD check (for R 2.13.1) if I use the save function to create an Rdata, but if I save the same object to a .rda file, no warning. Section 1.1.5 (pg 11 of the pdf) of the Writing R Extensions manual (2.13.1) appears to say that .Rdata files should be fine: " Data files can have one of three types as

I was writing Rd documentation for a new package when I came across this issue. Here's the smallest example: > library(tools) > cat("\\examples{x <- '<%=rnorm(1)%>'}\n",file=file.path(tempdir(),'test.Rd')) > readLines(file.path(tempdir(),'test.Rd')) [1] "\\examples{x <- '<%=rnorm(1)%>'}" >

Hello, I''m getting this warning: Warning: Ambiguous first argument; make sure. in my unit test: assert_match /^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$/, user.username Does anyone know why or how to change it so it disappears? Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

What do you think of this patch? I have added a check for the case I mentioned in the previous email as well as a similar situation I discovered later. Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Gohman" <gohman at apple.com> To: "Thomas B. Jablin" <tjablin at CS.Princeton.EDU> Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent:

I just saw a message from David Winsemius, responding to an inquiry from Carol White: > On Jan 28, 2013, at 9:06 PM, carol white wrote: > >> Should I understand that this message was received? > > It's always possible to check the Archives for this question. This prompted me to ask about a problem that has been bothering me for a while: When I go to "Search" on