Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches similar to: "Press delete key three times in R-2.6.1 to get segmentation fault (PR#10892)"
2008 Apr 19
1
Error: value of 'SET_CXTAIL' must be a char or NULL, not a 'char'
Dear List
On windows XP using R.2.6.2 I get the message
Error: value of 'SET_CXTAIL' must be a char or NULL, not a 'char'
in connection with calling C code (using the .Call interface). I have been unable to find any info on this (in Writing R extensions). Can anyone help me with understanding this error? (In case it helps in tracking the problem: I pass two matrices and a
2011 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
> Any updates on this?
>
> In particular, I'd like to see concrete patches proposed for review and
> inclusion into LLVM. I think having actual patches on the table and under
> review will help a great deal. Kostya, let me know if I can help prepare
> them.
>
Ok, I'll send the
2011 Aug 01
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
Any updates on this?
In particular, I'd like to see concrete patches proposed for review and
inclusion into LLVM. I think having actual patches on the table and under
review will help a great deal. Kostya, let me know if I can help prepare
them. A few general comments as well inline...
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26,
2011 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:05 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > What would be our next steps in getting ASan into the LLVM trunk?
> > I'd like to do it in two steps, first for the LLVM part with minimal
> tests and then for the run-time library and all tests.
> >
2011 Jul 26
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:05 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
> Hi,
> What would be our next steps in getting ASan into the LLVM trunk?
> I'd like to do it in two steps, first for the LLVM part with minimal tests and then for the run-time library and all tests.
> The current ASan's source repository will probably stay the primary home for the run-time library and tests as we plan