similar to: Press delete key three times in R-2.6.1 to get segmentation fault (PR#10892)

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches similar to: "Press delete key three times in R-2.6.1 to get segmentation fault (PR#10892)"

2008 Apr 19
1
Error: value of 'SET_CXTAIL' must be a char or NULL, not a 'char'
Dear List On windows XP using R.2.6.2 I get the message Error: value of 'SET_CXTAIL' must be a char or NULL, not a 'char' in connection with calling C code (using the .Call interface). I have been unable to find any info on this (in Writing R extensions). Can anyone help me with understanding this error? (In case it helps in tracking the problem: I pass two matrices and a
2011 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > Any updates on this? > > In particular, I'd like to see concrete patches proposed for review and > inclusion into LLVM. I think having actual patches on the table and under > review will help a great deal. Kostya, let me know if I can help prepare > them. > Ok, I'll send the
2011 Aug 01
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
Any updates on this? In particular, I'd like to see concrete patches proposed for review and inclusion into LLVM. I think having actual patches on the table and under review will help a great deal. Kostya, let me know if I can help prepare them. A few general comments as well inline... On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26,
2011 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:05 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > > Hi, > > What would be our next steps in getting ASan into the LLVM trunk? > > I'd like to do it in two steps, first for the LLVM part with minimal > tests and then for the run-time library and all tests. > >
2011 Jul 26
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker
On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:05 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > Hi, > What would be our next steps in getting ASan into the LLVM trunk? > I'd like to do it in two steps, first for the LLVM part with minimal tests and then for the run-time library and all tests. > The current ASan's source repository will probably stay the primary home for the run-time library and tests as we plan