similar to: x=.94 (PR#10529)

hello, i'm pete ,how can i order rows of matrix by max to min value? I have a matrix of membership degrees, with 82 (i) rows and K coloumns, K are clusters. I need first and second largest elements of the i-th row. for example 1 0.66 0.04 0.01 0.30 2 0.02 0.89 0.09 0.00 3 0.06 0.92 0.01 0.01 4 0.07 0.71 0.21 0.01 5 0.10 0.85 0.04 0.01 6 0.91 0.04 0.02 0.02 7 0.00 0.01 0.98 0.00 8 0.02

Dear List, This is just a programming problem which i cannot seem to figure out. I am trying to get a set of power from a test (say, kolmogorov smirnov) out of a distribution (say, G-K distribution) as follows. I am trying to reduce to pain of writing the whole set of data points (p# below) using "for" loop. However, I seem to have some problem in it as the output "M" does not

Dear list, I have observed a weird behaviour from R --- apologies if I am missing something obvious! df3f826f28 df3f826f28 Say you type in R: >c.preec <- 10074 >c.gd <- 2200 >p1 <- .2 >c.neo <- p1*9451 + (1-p1)*3883 >n.preec <- 3710 >n.gd <- 2650 >n.neo <- 2120 >n.pcos <- 53000 >unit.met <- 94 >cost.met <- 94*n.pcos >effect <-

Hi R-users, I have a list mylist <- list(c(0.79, 0.92, 0.91, 0.86, 0.96, 0.96, 0.95, 0.94, 0.99), c(0.28, 0.45, 0.59, 0.69, 0.80, 0.87, 0.95, 0.94, 0.98), c(0.29, 0.39, 0.59, 0.69, 0.68, 0.80, 0.93, 0.95, 0.98)) Is there a way to find the index of the list element that contains the lowest value among all the other elements? As the lowest value in each element is the first, the

Full_Name: Willa Chen Version: 2.7.2 OS: Window XP Submission from: (NULL) (128.122.182.70) The match function does not return value properly. See an example below. > a<-seq(0.6,1,by=0.01) > match(0.88,a) [1] 29 > match(0.89,a) [1] NA > match(0.90,a) [1] NA > match(0.91,a) [1] NA > match(0.92,a) [1] NA > match(0.93,a) [1] NA > match(0.94,a) [1] 35

I have a problem with R. I try to compute the confidence interval for my df. When I want to create the plot I have this problem: Error in xy.coords(x, y, xlabel, ylabel, log) : 'x' and 'y' lengths differ. I try this code: library(dplR) df.rwi <- detrend(rwl = df, method = "Spline",nyrs=NULL) write.table(df.rwi,file="rwi.txt",quote=FALSE,row.names=TRUE)

Dear R Users,i am very new to R. I want your help on an issue regarding distance matrix and cluster analysis i had discharge data of 4 rivers(a,b,c,d) in 4 vectors each having 364 values > dput(qmu)structure(list(a = c(0.26, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.24, 0.23, 0.22, 0.21, 0.21, 0.21, 0.2, 0.19, 0.19, 0.19, 0.19, 0.18, 0.18, 0.18, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17,

Greetings.? My wife is teaching an introductory stat class at UC Davis.? The class emphasizes the use of simulations, rather than mathematics, to get insight into statistics, and R is the mandated tool.?? A student in the class recently inquired about different approaches to sampling from a binomial distribution.? I've appended some code that exhibits the idea, the gist of which is that using

aa <- (structure(list(X.0.85 = c(-1.02, -1.17, -1.29, -1.39, -1.46, -1.5, -1.52, -1.5, -1.46, -1.39, -1.3, -1.19, -1.07, -0.93, -0.79, -0.65, -0.5, -0.36, -0.22, -0.08, 0.05, 0.18, 0.3, 0.41, 0.52, 0.62, 0.72, 0.81, 0.89, 0.98, 1.05, 1.13, 1.19, 1.25, 1.29, 1.31, 1.31, 1.29, 1.24, 1.16, 1.06, 0.93, 0.77, 0.58, 0.38, 0.16, -0.07, -0.31, -0.89, -1.05, -1.19, -1.31, -1.41, -1.47, -1.51, -1.51,

G'Day Tanya, Is it too late to bring in the following patches to fix some major brokenness in the AuroraUX tool chain for 2.6? http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84468&r2=84469&view=diff&pathrev=84469 http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84265&r2=84266&view=diff&pathrev=84266

I have a series of numbers I'm wanting to plot. They come from a nanodrop machine, which graphs with a specific x and y indices. X goes from 220nm to 350nm, which I can set. But the y axis should go from -5 to 65, but I'm finding it impossible to hardcode that. I've looked. I've typed ?plot at the R prompt. Google has not been my friend. _R Graphics_, if it holds the key, has not

Hello everyone,           I have a basic question regarding logical operators. > x<-seq(-1,1,by=0.02) > x   [1] -1.00 -0.98 -0.96 -0.94 -0.92 -0.90 -0.88 -0.86 -0.84 -0.82 -0.80 -0.78  [13] -0.76 -0.74 -0.72 -0.70 -0.68 -0.66 -0.64 -0.62 -0.60 -0.58 -0.56 -0.54  [25] -0.52 -0.50 -0.48 -0.46 -0.44 -0.42 -0.40 -0.38 -0.36 -0.34 -0.32 -0.30  [37] -0.28 -0.26 -0.24 -0.22 -0.20 -0.18 -0.16

Hi r-users,   I would like to extract the data that match.  Attached is my data: I'm interested in matchind the value in column 'intg' with value in column 'rand_no' > cbind(z=z,intg=dd,rand_no = rr)             z  intg rand_no    [1,]  0.00 0.000   0.001    [2,]  0.01 0.000   0.002    [3,]  0.02 0.000   0.002    [4,]  0.03 0.000   0.003    [5,]  0.04 0.000   0.003    [6,] 

Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64. autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release

hi, the help page for crossprod states that crossprod(A,B) is faster than t(A) %*% B; experimentation certainly bears this out. more alarming is the evidence that crossprod(t(A), B) is faster than A %*% B: on a PII laptop, 128MB memory, win98, R-1.5.0.-patched precompiled (no ATLAS): > A <- matrix(rnorm(250000),500,500) > B <- matrix(rnorm(250000),500,500) > for (i in 1:5) {

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

Hello, I would like to perform a monotone transformation of y (my response variable) to achieve additivity. My model is as follows y~X+items I do not want to transform X or items (both of these variables are factors) > X [1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 [61] 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Levels: 1 2 3 4 5

hi, - big and ugly mail. If you don't like them, delete it now :-) - I have collected and classified some information of: http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html And I observed that ext3 performance is worse than previous kernels(2.4.19...). -ac and -aa are here only as reference. Complete information is in the upper URL. dbench: Performance is worse. dbench (Numbers are in

Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386 autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release build. llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.

Hi, LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results: Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4) Release mode, but with assertions enabled LLVM srcdir == objdir # of expected passes 2250 # of expected failures 5 I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC, so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff" test the machine was swapping