similar to: sd(NA)

Dear all, is there a good way to create SVG plots with R whose elements have titles (tooltips) or act as hyperlinks? I am using the RSvgDevice package, which works great - but it doesn't seem to support the notion that plot objects have titles or are act as hyperlinks, so I am helping myself by giving the objects funny unique colors and then postprocessing the .svg file. I wonder

Hi, I am finding the recently added [1] functionality of embedding raster images into plots on R devices very useful! Thanks to Paul Murrell and others for providing that. I noted that in https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/grDevices/src/devPS.c a macro is defined: #define MAX_RASTERS 64, and consequently, I get Error in grid.Call.graphics("L_raster", x$raster, x$x, x$y,

Hi, when running the following on a fresh R, library("IRanges") annotation showMethods("annotation") Biobase:::annotation showMethods("annotation") I get (see the "^^^^^" marked output at the bottom): > library("IRanges") Carico il pacchetto richiesto: 'IRanges' The following object(s) are masked from package:base :

Dear R users & developers, Seth Falcon and Martin Morgan are teaching Advanced R Programming and Bioconductor 30 March - 1 April 2007 at the Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK. This two-day course focuses on programming skills required to develop software for statistical analysis of high-throughput genomic data using R and Bioconductor. Lectures and practical sessions

Dear Tony, thanks for the tip with "nargs", when suitably applied, this answers the problem. The behaviour of "nargs" in S4 methods has some subtleties compared to that in normal functions, as shown in the example below. I admit that this is what had earlier created some confusion about the semantics of "nargs". From the perspective of "nargs" and its

Hello, I think this qualify as a bug > x<-c(1,2,3,4,NA,6,7) > mean(x) [1] NA > mean(x,na.rm=T) [1] 3.833333 > sd(x) Error in var(as.vector(x)) : missing observations in cov/cor > sd(x,na.rm=T) Error in sd(x, na.rm = T) : unused argument(s) (na.rm ...) > var(x) Error in var(x) : missing observations in cov/cor > var(x,na.rm=T) [1] 5.366667 > why sd() does not

huber at ebi.ac.uk wrote: > Full_Name: Wolfgang Huber > Version: R version 2.4.0 Under development (unstable) (2006-07-09 r38523) > OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu > Submission from: (NULL) (62.253.128.15) > > > There appears to be unintentional behaviour in the size of the bounding box for > PDF graphics produced with the current R2.4, compared to 2.3.1. I posted two PDF >

Dear R-users, Running R 2.1.1 in WindowsXP, there seems to be a 'bug' in sd() If >x<-c(1,2,3,NA,5) >mean(x) [1] NA But >sd(x) Or >var(x) give Error in var(x, na.rm = na.rm) : missing observations in cov/cor There are obvious work-rounds, like >sd(x, is.na(x)==F) which gives the result (with error message) [1] 1.707825 Warning message: the condition has length > 1

Hello all, I just upgraded to R 2.7.0 and found that the behavior of 'var' and 'sd' have changed in the presence NAs (this wasn't explicit in the NEWS file, though I see it probably has to do with the change for cor/cov). Anyway, I just want to make sure that it was intentional to produce an error when there was all NAs and na.rm=TRUE, rather than returning an NA (like R

I recently started using R 2.7.2, and noticed a surprising change in the behavior of var() on NA data: R 2.6.1 (Patched), 2007-11-26, svn.rev 43541, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu: > stdev(rep(NA,3), na.rm=F) [1] NA > stdev(rep(NA,3), na.rm=T) [1] NA > var(rep(NA,3), na.rm=T, use="complete.obs") [1] NA R 2.7.2 (Patched), 2008-09-02, svn.rev 46491,

FWIW, I suspect this is related to the function R_unif_index that was introduced in src/main/RNG.c around revision 72356, or the way this function is used in do_sample in src/main/random.c. 20.9.18 08:19, Wolfgang Huber scripsit: > Besides wording of the documentation re truncating vs rounding, there is > something peculiar going on with the fractional part of n: > > >

Besides wording of the documentation re truncating vs rounding, there is something peculiar going on with the fractional part of n: > table(sample.int(2.5, 1e6, replace = TRUE)) 1 2 3 399051 401035 199914 > table(sample.int(3, 1e6, replace = TRUE)) 1 2 3 332956 332561 334483 > table(sample.int(2.01, 1e6, replace = TRUE)) 1 2 3

In the previous versions of R (2.6.1), when a vector of NA was given to the functions 'sd' or 'var' with parameter na.rm = TRUE, it used to return NA. Now (2.7.1) it returns an ERROR : Example in 2.6.1: > sd(c(NA, NA, NA, NA), na.rm = TRUE) [1] NA Example in 2.7.1: > sd(c(NA, NA, NA, NA), na.rm = TRUE) Error in var(x, na.rm = na.rm) : paires d'éléments

It was already in the process of being changed, hence the first seven lines of the function. That lapply is no longer needed and has been removed (but was not yet committed). We do normally ask that problems with R-devel ('Under development (unstable)') not be sent to R-bugs: as is quite often the case this is something that is under active development. On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Peter

Dear Neil Have you tried with completely uninstalling your R, and reinstalling a more recent version (e.g. 3.2.4 right now). And then the same with your operating system - OS X is currently at 10.11.4. There is likely not much interest (or benefit) in chasing such things in obsolete versions. And I think R-help would be the more appropriate place for this kind of question. Wolfgang > On Apr

Dear SIr, In case of looking at the codes of the fuction, "cov", we find all the codings below. But, incase of "mean", we don't find the contents. Please show me the way to look at all the codings of any functions. Best regards, Kei ----------------------- > cov function (x, y = NULL, use = "all.obs", method = c("pearson",

Dear Wolfgang, Thanks for your response. No, I haven't tried doing the complete reinstallation as you suggest. If I recall correctly, this has happened on previous occasions but like I said in my email it's not all that disruptive to my workflow. It's more like a 'first world problem'. I was encouraged to submit the query because I had correspondence with someone involved

Dear all, The other day I was reading this post [1] that slightly surprised me: "To reject the null of no correlation, an hypothsis test based on the normal distribution. If normality is not the base assumption your working from then p-values, significance tests and conf. intervals dont mean much (the value of the coefficient is not reliable) " (BOB SAMOHYL). To me this implied that in

Dear all, It seems that textConnection() can trigger a segmentation fault. The following script (using two large loops) makes this bug reproducible: for (i in 1:10000) { z=textConnection(NULL,open='w') for (j in 1:100) { write(runif(1)*1e6,file=z) write('\n',file=z) } close(z) } The bug could be reproduced on R-2.6.1, R-2.7.0 and on the latest R-devel

Full_Name: Jerome Asselin Version: 1.7.1 OS: Red Hat Linux 7.2 Submission from: (NULL) (24.77.125.119) Setting the parameter na.action=na.omit should remove incomplete records in princomp. However this does not seem to work as expected. See example below. Sincerely, Jerome Asselin data(USArrests) princomp(USArrests, cor = TRUE) #THIS WORKS USArrests[1,3] <- NA princomp(USArrests, cor =