similar to: compiling R-devel

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "compiling R-devel"

2008 Jun 23
1
r-base build: failure to convert R-FAQ to pdf
We have received an email in Ubuntu alerting us that something strange was going on during the r-base 2.7.1 rc build (see [1]). It seems that there is an error during the convertion of R-FAQ.texi to pdf. The following excerpt, taken from [2], shows the problem: /bin/sh: line 0: test: too many arguments TEXINPUTS=".:$TEXINPUTS" /usr/bin/texi2dvi --texinfo="@set UseExternalXrefs
2003 May 17
1
problem building dvi and pdf documentation on Darwin 10.2.6
I just installed R-1.7.0 on Darwin 6.6 (a.k.a. MacOS 10.2.6). 'make' and 'make check' run without any problems. 'make info' builds with no complaints, but 'make dvi' and 'make pdf' fail. I get refman.dvi and refman.pdf OK (with some warnings from pdftex that some names are referenced that do not exist), but R-FAQ.{dvi,pdf} fails as shown below. Attempts
2000 Apr 24
1
make problems
I'm having trouble making the manuals as per the INSTALL instructions. Anyone have any hints as to what's wrong? <123>-> make dvi DVI/LaTeX documentation: reference index ... *** Error code 255 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `refman.dvi'
2015 Oct 09
2
Building manuals are failing now that MikTex 2.9 has removed texi2dvi.exe
According to the MikTex bug reports [1], MikTex 2.9 has removed texi2dvi.exe last week (on 2015-09-29) as "it was not compatible (anymore) with the original shell script texi2dvi (GNU Texinfo)." I found this out the hard way as I just (unknowingly) updated MikTex this evening, and then, while building R-devel_2015-10-08 on Windows7 64bit using the Rtools 3.3 toolchain (4.9.3 branch), had
2004 Feb 01
1
error in building R-1.9.0 sources under Win32
I am trying to compile the R-dev sources on WinXP using mingw 3.1.0-1 and fpTeX 0.7. In the past I have been able to build the sources fine but now I receive an error in the process that I havent seen reported on the list before. Everything works fine until I get to 'make docs'. I now get the message below while building the R-admin manual (refman.pdf builds fine) and the make process
2003 Jul 21
2
missing permissions in reference manual copyright page (PR#3528)
Hi, I noticed that the R reference manual seems to be missing the license permissions on the copyright page. Below is a patch to "refman.top" which adds the same permissions as the @permission{} macro in "R-defs.texi". I'm filing this bug as I have been preparing to publish the R Reference Manual (in several volumes). I plan to donate 5 EUR to the R-foundation for each
2005 Nov 18
1
R-exts.texi in SVN version 36380
G'day all, after issuing `svn up' on my machine this morning, I noticed that `make info' choked on R-exts.texi. Below is a patch that seems to solve the problem. BTW, while `make info' runs now, I still get the following warning: /usr/bin/makeinfo --enable-encoding -D UseExternalXrefs -I/opt/src/R-devel-src/doc/manual /opt/src/R-devel-src/doc/manual/R-exts.texi
2013 Aug 02
2
[LLVMdev] Missing optimization - constant parameter
For the little C test program where a constant is stored in memory and also used as a parameter: #include <stdint.h> uint64_t val, *p; extern uint64_t xtr( uint64_t); uint64_t caller() { uint64_t x; p = &val; x = 12345123400L; *p = x; return xtr(x); } clang (3.2, 3.3 and svn) generates the following X86 code (at -O3): caller: movq
2015 Oct 09
0
Building manuals are failing now that MikTex 2.9 has removed texi2dvi.exe
Hmm, look in MkRules.dist for the setting you failed to make .... Obviously available in R-patched and R-devel only as we cannot foretell such changes. On 09/10/2015 06:24, Avraham Adler wrote: > According to the MikTex bug reports [1], MikTex 2.9 has removed > texi2dvi.exe last week (on 2015-09-29) as "it was not compatible > (anymore) with the original shell script texi2dvi (GNU
2013 Aug 02
0
[LLVMdev] Missing optimization - constant parameter
> I expected that this optimization would be picked > up in a cse, gvn, machine-cse or even peepholing pass. > > Comments? At the LLVM IR level this is represented as define i64 @caller() #0 { entry: store i64* @val, i64** @p, align 8, !tbaa !0 store i64 12345123400, i64* @val, align 8, !tbaa !3 %call = tail call i64 @xtr(i64 12345123400) #2 ret i64 %call } Which is
2005 Nov 16
1
PPC package-ppc.read.raw.nobatch (PR#8316)
Full_Name: Martin O'Gorman Version: OS: Submission from: (NULL) (84.176.63.149) I have been looking at the PPC package and have a question. As the input data is comma separated, shouldn?t the command to read in the raw (no batch) mass spec data indicate that sep=?,? (marked below) ? Otherwise, the data read in is the pair of values (m/z,intensity). It is not obvious why that should be.
2015 Sep 07
2
Build rpm package for R-MKL
I want to create a clean .rpm package for R built with MKL and ICC. I follow Fedora instrcutions[0] to create the package. As a base, I use the R-3.2.2.src.rpm. I am left with this error: ------------------------------------------ installing R info pages ... updating '/usr/share/info/dir' ... make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/poisonivy/rpmbuild/BUILD/R-3.2.2/doc/manual' + mv
2005 Oct 06
1
how to use tune.knn() for dataset with missing values
Hi Everybody, i again have the problem in using tune.knn(), its giving an error saying missing values are not allowed.... again here is the script for BreastCancer Data, library(e1071) library(mda) trdata<-data.frame(train,row.names=NULL) attach(trdata) xtr <- subset(trdata, select = -Class) ytr <- Class bestpara <-tune.knn(xtr,ytr, k = 1:25, tunecontrol = tune.control(sampling
2008 Nov 20
1
Calculate an equation
Dear all, I was wondering if you could help me with the following. I want to do calculate this equation: Ps(t)= (?_(r=1)^N Xtr* 1/?drs)/(?_(r=1)^N 1/?drs) Ps(t) ? Probability that taxon t will occur at site s (300 sites s) N ? Number of sites = from 1 to 49 Xtr ? Value for taxon t at site r (I have this information in a table, 40 taxa (columns) t, 49 sites r) drs ? Distance from site r to
2013 Aug 02
2
[LLVMdev] Missing optimization - constant parameter
On Aug 2, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> I expected that this optimization would be picked >> up in a cse, gvn, machine-cse or even peepholing pass. >> >> Comments? > > > At the LLVM IR level this is represented as > > define i64 @caller() #0 { > entry: > store i64* @val, i64** @p, align 8, !tbaa
2005 May 14
2
[LLVMdev] Cygwin llvm-gcc build error
Now I believe that I am getting the same error as I was getting last time I tried to build llvm-gcc. It may possibly be my Cygwin instillation but am not sure. makeinfo --split-size=5000000 -I ../../../src/llvm-gcc/gcc/doc -I ../../../src/ llvm-gcc/gcc/doc/include \ -o ../../../src/llvm-gcc/gcc/doc/cpp.info ../../../src/llvm-gcc/gcc/doc/cpp.texi ' in
2005 May 17
0
[LLVMdev] Cygwin llvm-gcc build error
Hi Aaron, have you got any help on this? Henrik >From: "Aaron Gray" Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 18:26:01 +0100 > >Now I believe that I am getting the same error as I was getting last time I >tried to build llvm-gcc. >It may possibly be my Cygwin instillation but am not sure. > > >makeinfo --split-size=5000000 -I ../../../src/llvm-gcc/gcc/doc -I >../../../src/
2005 May 17
2
[LLVMdev] Cygwin llvm-gcc build error
>Hi Aaron, >have you got any help on this? Henrik, No. This is where I was stuck some months ago. I do not know makeinfo so was not able to proceed any thurther than verifying the makeinfo statement did the same thing when done on the command line. Basically I am stuck. I do not know whether it was my Cygwin configuration or something I have done or not done or whether it is a valid
2004 Nov 16
1
[LLVMdev] Makeinfo fails
Hi, Is it really true that nobody isn't able to give me a clue why makeinfo fails with this error: doc/cpp.texi:50: Unknown index `vr' and/or `op' in @synindex. ------------------------- make[2]: Entering directory `/C/Projects/src/llvm-gcc/gcc' for d in libgcc; do \ if [ -d $d ]; then true; else /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs $d; fi; \ done if [ -f stmp-dirs ]; then true; else
2014 Feb 04
1
[PATCH] nouveau/codegen: allow tex offsets on non-TXF instructions (e.g. TXL)
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- This fixes the bin/fs-textureOffset-2D piglit test on nv50. Have yet to re-run the full piglit suite with this change in place, but it seems pretty obvious. src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_from_tgsi.cpp | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_from_tgsi.cpp