similar to: attach/detach asymmetry

I have a large R program that I am constantly running over and over again. At the beginning of this program, I create a hige matrix and a huge dataframe but these are constant. What I mean by constant is that, if I run the program over later, I really should just use the old matrix and dataframe ( if they exist ) that were created in a previous run so that the program doesn't have to spend

[R-0.50-a3] It seems intuitive that attach( .., pos = 1) is harder than other attach()es. But still... If it ever will work, it is even more important to have detach( .... , save = "VAR.name") ~~~~~~~ -------- to be working. The documentation says that detach(.) returns invisibly. Therefore, we don't NEED the above 'save = ' argument to detach, since we can

Hi, I found the following problems. xm pci-attach command and xm pci-detach command fail on inactive managed domains. An attaching patch solves the problems. # xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 1024 2 r----- 51.5 vm1 512 2

Hi all I just encountered a problem in libvirt while was trying to attach and detach a sr-iov vf to my VM The version of my libvirt is 1.1.1-0ubuntu8.5 I tried to attach the device using following xml <interface type='hostdev' managed='yes'> <mac address='5c:01:fd:12:34:58'/> <source> <address type='pci'

This patch enables ''xm pci-attach/detach'' commands to be executed via xen-api. Regards, ----------------------- Yosuke Iwamatsu NEC Corporation _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Drop the dummy ttm backend implementation, add a real one for TTM_PL_FLAG_TT objects. The bin/unbind callbacks will call virtio_gpu_object_{attach,detach}, to update the object state on the host side, instead of invoking those calls from the move_notify() callback. With that in place the move and move_notify callbacks are not needed any more, so drop them. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann

Drop the dummy ttm backend implementation, add a real one for TTM_PL_FLAG_TT objects. The bin/unbind callbacks will call virtio_gpu_object_{attach,detach}, to update the object state on the host side, instead of invoking those calls from the move_notify() callback. With that in place the move and move_notify callbacks are not needed any more, so drop them. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann

If an attempt is made to attach to position 1, it appears to work (not even a warning) but in fact it doesn't work as many would expect. "search" thinks that it gets placed in position 2, but nothing is actually there (according to "ls"). This is guaranteed to be confusing (and annoying) to people who are used to attaching to position 1 in S-PLUS. I'm not clear on

Hi, I know this isn't a valid use case or generally sane thing to do, but we have a bug (link, with details, below) filed for a panic against a detach-disk/attach-disk sequence of an ext4 mounted vd device on a rhel kernel. The same sequence leads to the following BUG on an upstream kernel (3.7.0-rc5+ SMP x86_64 GNU/Linux): [ 75.114951] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer

Hi, I know this isn't a valid use case or generally sane thing to do, but we have a bug (link, with details, below) filed for a panic against a detach-disk/attach-disk sequence of an ext4 mounted vd device on a rhel kernel. The same sequence leads to the following BUG on an upstream kernel (3.7.0-rc5+ SMP x86_64 GNU/Linux): [ 75.114951] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer

Hello everybody, I'm studying descriptive statistics with R and I want to know how to calculate the asymmetry and kurtosis coefficients of a sample using R. I'll appreciate some help. Thanx, Talita Perciano Costa Leite Graduanda em Ci?ncia da Computa??o Universidade Federal de Alagoas - UFAL Departamento de Tecnologia da Informa??o - TCI Constru??o de Conhecimento por Agrupamento de

Dear experRts, I have the feeling that the 'name' argument to the attach function is ignored when 'what' is a file name. Here is an example: save(letters, file="letters.RData") letters.env <- attach("letters.RData", name="letters") search() letters.env The name on the search path is "file:letters.RData". I would expect it to be

hi - running R 1.1.1 under LinuxPPC: i was pleasantly surprised to find that attaching .RData files was added somewhere along the line, but i am having trouble getting the sort of behavior that i got used to in S. specifically, i'd like to be able to attach() a file at pos=1 and edit its contents directly, then save() and detach() it. i know i can load() the file, but this merges its

Open Letter to Developers, Is there any way you can cut through the mob scene at Homeland Defense with a powerful new encryption/decryption formula? The government cryptography bunch are stuck in symmetry and asymmetry and are deaf/dumb/blind to supersymmetry. When it's so easy to line up a supersymmetrical hypercube fractal-to-fractal, pair-to-pair, quantum-to-quantum and slice through

Hi all, Has anyone tested for FA in R? I need to seperate out the variance due to measurement error from variation between individuals (following Palmer & Strobeck 1986). Andy Higginson Animal Behaviour and Ecology Research Group School of Biology University of Nottingham NG7 2RD U.K. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain

On Nov 11, 2013, at 10:44 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> "Unlike sqrt in libm, however, llvm.sqrt has undefined behavior for >> ..." >> >> to "... produces an undefined value", with a link back to >> ##undefined-values. > > I'm not sure that helps, because it will prevents sqrt + -fno-math-errno (a readnone sqrt)

??????? Hello everybody, ?? On a Dovecot 2.x, what is the best way to delete an user mailbox when : * all attachments for all users detach in a common directory (mail_attachment_dir = var/mail/attachments ). * attachments use SIS deduplication (mail_attachment_fs = sis posix) * mailbox are in mdbox Trying to delete user mailbox directory (rm) and do the command? : doveadm -v purge -u johndoe ,

On Nov 11, 2013, at 9:30 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> Hi Hal, all. >> >> I'm not sure why llvm.sqrt is 'special'. Maybe because there is a >> SSE >> packed sqrt instruction (SQRTPS) but not e.g. a packed sin >> instruction >> AFAIK. > > This seems relevant:

Switch to the virtio_gpu_array_* helper workflow. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_gem.c | 24 +++++++++++------------- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c | 12 ++++++++---- 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h

Hi Hal, all. I'm not sure why llvm.sqrt is 'special'. Maybe because there is a SSE packed sqrt instruction (SQRTPS) but not e.g. a packed sin instruction AFAIK. As mentioned in a recent mail to this list, I would like llvm.sqrt to be defined as NaN for argument x < 0. I believe this would bring it more into line with the other intrinsics, and with the libm result, which is