similar to: mingw-cross rpm spec file

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "mingw-cross rpm spec file"

2015 Mar 18
2
Need help for write rpm spec
Hi I am try to write rpm spec for install tomcat on a linux machine.But while build the rpm i found following error + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id /home/rpmbuild/BUILD/Install_tomcat-1.0 extracting debug info from /home/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/Install_tomcat-1.0-1.el6.x86_64/usr/local/jdk1.7.0_13/lib/visualvm/profiler/lib/deployed/jdk16/linux-amd64/libprofilerinterface.so ***
2011 Nov 19
4
build postfix spec w/ mysql
hello list! I am attempting to build an rpm of postfix that includes support for mysql. I've done this before with earlier versions on postfix but I am staring at this spec file until my eyes bleed and I just don't see why when I build the spec with rpmbuild mysql support isn't there. After I install the rpm I have a look at the modules as such: ldd $(which postfix) | grep -i
2012 Mar 25
2
build postfix rpm with mysql
hello list, I'm trying to build a postfix rpm that has mysql support included. I've found the line where I need to define mysql support but it seems that I am being tripped up by some build dependencies: [root at beta SPECS]# rpmbuild -ba postfix.spec error: Failed build dependencies: MySQL-shared is needed by postfix-2.9.1-1.rhel5.x86_64 MySQL-devel is needed by
2011 Feb 17
1
Nested defined resources
I''m working on a module to handle creating and populating Python virtualenvs. Without going into too much detail, basically these are nicely-encapsulated environments into which python packages can be installed and run. It''s not uncommon to have several virtualenvs on a system, potentially with the same packages installed (maybe different versions). Puppet''s defines
2007 Jul 11
1
RPM Build Question
Hi People, I have just started building my own RPMS on both Fedora and CentOS and generally things have gone well. Currently I am trying to create RPMS for some commercial software that we have purchased. Step 1 was install the software using its JAVA Based installer ensuring that all files were installed into a particular directory in /usr/local. Step 2 was create a tar file of the
2011 Feb 11
1
[PATCH v2v] Add support for performing automated builds
* .gitignore: Ignore RPM specfile & coverage data * Build.PL: Generate specfile during build * autobuild.sh: Build control file * virt-v2v.spec.PL: RPM specfile * MANIFEST.SKIP: Ignore test coverage data --- .gitignore | 3 + Build.PL | 3 +- MANIFEST | 3 + MANIFEST.SKIP | 1 + autobuild.sh | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++ virt-v2v.spec.PL | 160
2004 Sep 10
1
Problems with FLAC make
Hi, I have been making an RPM of FLAC to bundle with GStreamer. In order to get it working I had to make some rather hackish solutions in the SPEC file. The flac Makefile does to build into the correct directories while creating an RPM for some reason. I have attached the SPEC file I ended up with if it is of interest. Of course it didn't help me much cause it turned up we had a bug in the
2001 Feb 21
0
bug?: building RPM of 2.5.1p1 uses wrong pam.d/ssh file for RH6 vs RH7
(I'm using RedHat 6.2 and openssl-0.9.5a-3) After rebuilding binary RPMs using openssh-2.5.1p1-1.src.rpm, I was unable to ssh in to a system upgraded to the new openssh-server-2.5.1p1.rpm After the failure, /var/log/messages on the destination indicated lots of PAM errors of the form "sshd[22814]: PAM [dlerror: /lib/security/pam_stack.so: can not open shared object file: No such file
2003 Jan 28
2
rsync-2.5.6 build on Red Hat 8.0 fails
The packaging/lsb/rsync.spec file is broken as shipped: It has a "Sept" month (rpmbuild here takes only 3-letter month names), and RH gzips the manpages, so the %files list can't find them. I also added doc/README-SGML and doc/rsync.sgml to the %doc files. Patch follows. Thanks for all the good work! --- rsync-2.5.6/packaging/lsb/rsync.spec.orig 2003-01-28 06:28:35.000000000 +0100
2000 Sep 03
0
[PATCH]: openssh.spec file for SuSE 6.4 & 7.0
Attached is a spec file for OpenSSH on SuSE 6.4 and 7.0 systems. It differs from the current spec file in the following details: - Only one rpm file is created containing client and server files. - PreReq `openssl-devel' is changed to `openssl'. - Path '/usr/libexec/ssh' is changed to '/usr/lib/ssh' for ssh-askpass and gnome-ssh-askpass. The resulting
2014 Jan 03
1
Need help with spec file for Apache-2.4.7
I am trying to build an RPM for Apache-2.4.7-1 on Centos-6.5-i86_64. I am using mock. The are three build dependencies that I am trying to resolve. One, mod_socache_dc / distcache, I have simply removed from the spec file. The other two are arp and apr-utils. Since httpd-2.4.7 needs arp >= 1.4 I got the two latter requirements from http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.4.7-deps.tar.bz2
2012 Jan 22
1
Packaging GObject for Fedora (was: [rjones@fedoraproject.org: New upstream version 1.15.19.])
These are the changes I made to the spec file related to gobject bindings and gobject introspection. TBH I wasn't sure how to properly package this. Rich. diff --git a/libguestfs.spec b/libguestfs.spec index 095a848..1b6e43d 100644 --- a/libguestfs.spec +++ b/libguestfs.spec @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Summary: Access and modify virtual machine disk images Name: libguestfs Epoch:
2005 Oct 06
7
Patch: FC4 spec file
The patch below modifies the spec file for FC4 RPM builds as follows: 1.) Build binaries using the -lmcheck option; various samba commands and smbd process crash badly without; see, for example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=164353 2.) The Fedora project's samba RPMS install mount.cifs; it would help to have samba.org's RPMS do the same. It would be nice to
2000 Sep 03
1
installing OpenSSH rpm on SuSE 6.2
I am taking the liberty of forwarding this message to the list. I am not subscribed to it. If you want to reply to me, please send email to faheem at email.unc.edu Thanks, Faheem Mitha. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Faheem Mitha <faheem at email.unc.edu> Newsgroups: comp.security.ssh Subject: installing OpenSSH rpm on SuSE 6.2 Dear people, I tried
2013 Apr 05
2
mock and iaxmodem
I am trying to build an rpm package for iaxmodem-1.2.0. At the moment I am still trying to get a working spec file put together. I have managed to get an SRPM produced but the binary build from this fails due to there being no install task in the Makefile.in provided with the source. I have found a spec file from opensuse that provides this in the install portion: %build [
2011 Jan 05
1
Bug#609005: xen-utils-4.0: please consider supporting remus
Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: wishlist [resending from another address since my ISP seems to be queueing emails for up to 25 hours and counting...] I did some experiments with the xen remus HA system. With overlord3:~$ debdiff xen_4.0.1-1.dsc xen_4.0.1-1lindi1.dsc diff -Nru xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real --- xen-4.0.1/debian/rules.real 2010-08-02
2007 Oct 02
1
Peculiar situation while build httpd-2.2.6 from provided spec
Hi all, While build a rpm from the httpd-2.2.6 sources (spec file included in the source package), i had a situation where packaging would fail at the step where several link are created for "logs" etc directories. <<..snip from httpd.spec...>> # symlinks for /etc/httpd ln -s ../..%{_localstatedir}/log/httpd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/httpd/logs ln -s ../..%{_localstatedir}/run
2019 Apr 12
2
rpmbuild how to know we are building kernel module package
Hi, When I build a mpt3sas rpm package, I found something interesting: 1. package name is prefixed with kmod- automatically 2. so many requirements are added automatically, most of them are kabi So my question is rpmbuild how to know he is building kernel module package? Based on which condition? Here is mpt3sas.spec: Name: mpt3sas Version: 26.00.00.00 Release: 1 Summary: RHEL
2001 Jan 11
3
contrib/redhat/openssh.spec question
I have a couple of questions regarding openssh.spec and the rpm that gets generated from it. I am using 2.3.0p1 1. Why is openssl a prereq? openssh statically links to openssl during build by default (rightfully so, you don't want your security library a shared object if possible) 2. I don't understand the following line in the spec file during the install step (it makes it not build for
2003 Nov 13
1
generic rpm .spec.in
Hi there, I made up a very simple and generic rpm .spec.in. It's .in, so autoconf can replace the VERSION in it, so there's only one place to maintain the version number. This .spec.in is independent of any distribution and does not include any "advanced" features. It just packages the installed files up. There are two things that it does do extra: 1) create