similar to: Problem with R-2.5.0 patched and Matrix package

Hi all, I'm trying to build from source on Linux and getting the following error when it tries to build the help for 'nlme': <snip> ranef.lme text html latex example reStruct text html latex example /home/sfalcon/sw/R-related/R-1.8.1/bin/INSTALL: line 1: 8133 Segmentation fault ${R_CMD} perl

Duncan that does indeed look to be the case. Many thanks! In particular, tests/reg-tests-1d.R optionally loads the Matrix namespace which allows the test to succeed. Compare: ~/R-rc_2019-04-21_r76409/bin/Rscript -e "options(warn=2); library(Matrix); res <- findMethods('isSymmetric'); print('success')" [1] "success" versus

Full_Name: Mike Danilov Version: 2.9.0 OS: Fedora Core 9 Submission from: (NULL) (142.103.121.198) When checking for the symmetry of a matrix, function isSymmetric.matrix() gets confused by the discrepancy of colnames/rownames if its argument. See the code snippet below. Perhaps it's a problem of the matrix product which copies colnames of the first argument but not the rownames of the

Hello, Most likely I'm doing something wrong, but am at a loss as to what the issue is. I have a clean checkout of trunk here: ?? ~/svn/r-devel/R$ svn info ?? Path: . ?? Working Copy Root Path: /home/btyner/svn/r-devel/R ?? URL: https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk ?? Relative URL: ^/trunk ?? Repository Root: https://svn.r-project.org/R ?? Repository UUID:

promptClass fails to identify methods associated with the class. Here is a fix: Index: promptClass.R =================================================================== --- promptClass.R (revision 41719) +++ promptClass.R (working copy) @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ if (nmeths > 0) { .meths.body <- " \\describe{" for (i in 1:nmeths) { - .sigmat

Hi, I have this symmetric matrix, at least I think so. col1 col2 col3 [1,] 0.20 0.05 0.06 [2,] 0.05 0.10 0.03 [3,] 0.06 0.03 0.08 or structure(c(0.2, 0.05, 0.06, 0.05, 0.1, 0.03, 0.06, 0.03, 0.08 ), .Dim = c(3L, 3L), .Dimnames = list(NULL, c("var1", "var2", "var3"))) But isSymmetric() doesn't agree. Any comment? I am on R 2.10.1 Thanks. Jun

The problem with multiple packages in a library that I reported a few minutes ago seems to occur only if RLIBS ends in a ":". I was setting RLIBS=../padi/rlib:$RLIBS and when RLIBS has no value to begin with this causes the problem. This is obviously not very urgent as I can get around it easily. Paul Gilbert

Hi, While running R CMD build on one of the Bioc packages, I'm getting the following error message * creating vignettes ... OK * cleaning src * removing junk files * checking for LF line-endings in source files Can't call method "print" on an undefined value at /home/sfalcon/arch/x86_64/R-2.3/bin/build line 646. The pacakge has CRLF line endings in source files. >

Dear all, I am trying to define "+" method for my newly defined s4 class which is as follows: setClass("Me", sealed=F,representation(x1 = "numeric", x2 = "character")) new1 <- new("Me", x1=2, x2="comment1") new2 <- new("Me", x1=3, x2="comment1") setMethod("+", "Me",

> On 28 Jun 2019, at 16:03 , Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > >>>>>> Henrik Bengtsson >>>>>> on Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:00:39 -0700 writes: > >> Using: >> >> untrace(methods::conformMethod) >> at <- c(12,4,3,2) >> str(body(methods::conformMethod)[[at]]) >> ## language omittedSig

Hi, I want to make use of some C routines from other packages to write extensions in C. In "Writing R Extensions", it says there is an experimental interface to support this in (or from ?) R 2.4.0. I had a dummy library containing src/dummy.cpp and R/zzz.R: ====== src/dummy.cpp ==== #include <R.h> #include <Rinternals.h> #include <R_ext/Rdynload.h>

Using: untrace(methods::conformMethod) at <- c(12,4,3,2) str(body(methods::conformMethod)[[at]]) ## language omittedSig <- omittedSig && (signature[omittedSig] != "missing") cc <- 0L trace(methods::conformMethod, tracer = quote({ cc <<- cc + 1L print(cc) if (cc == 31) { ## manually identified untrace(methods::conformMethod)

>>>>> Martin Maechler >>>>> on Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:33:10 +0200 writes: >>>>> peter dalgaard >>>>> on Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:20:03 +0200 writes: >> > On 28 Jun 2019, at 16:03 , Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >> > >> >>>>>> Henrik Bengtsson

>>>>> Henrik Bengtsson >>>>> on Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:00:39 -0700 writes: > Using: > > untrace(methods::conformMethod) > at <- c(12,4,3,2) > str(body(methods::conformMethod)[[at]]) > ## language omittedSig <- omittedSig && (signature[omittedSig] != "missing") > cc <- 0L > trace(methods::conformMethod, tracer =

I put some documentation in a file dse/man/dse.Rd in and did R INSTALL -l rlibs dse This built the copies of dse.Rd in rlibs/dse/{help latex html}. It also wrote over R/doc/html/function.html and R/doc/html/packages.html, effectively clobbering all the R documentation. Also, the link that gets put in R/doc/html/packages.html points to R/library/dse/html/00Index.html rather than

>>>>> peter dalgaard >>>>> on Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:20:03 +0200 writes: > > On 28 Jun 2019, at 16:03 , Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > > > >>>>>> Henrik Bengtsson > >>>>>> on Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:00:39 -0700 writes: > > > >> Using: > >> > >>

Dear all, I'm working on MAC OS X 10.4.7 using R version 2.3.1 (June 2006) and platform powerpc-apple-darwin8.6.0. Since I installed the new version of R I cannot install packages any more (but it worked fine before) and get the following message every time. I can, however, install packages from the command line if I get them as precompiled binaries.

I run checks with R-devel rev. 76756 on several of my packages which use S4, with no ill effects. With the risk of not adding much, it seems that Martin's example, which I repeat below, suggests a crossover between several "signatures" involved here - the signature of the generic, the signature of the method (the argument for setMethod()), and the signature of the function object

In 'conformMethod', there is another instance of omittedSig & <something about signature[omittedSig]> . It just affects error message. Original: ? ? if(any(is.na(match(signature[omittedSig], c("ANY", "missing"))))) { ? ? ? ? bad <- omittedSig & is.na(match(signature[omittedSig], c("ANY", "missing"))) After r76756: ? ? if(any(iiN

>>>>> Martin Maechler >>>>> on Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:05:49 +0200 writes: >>>>> Martin Maechler >>>>> on Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:33:10 +0200 writes: >>>>> peter dalgaard >>>>> on Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:20:03 +0200 writes: >>> > On 28 Jun 2019, at 16:03 , Martin Maechler <maechler at