similar to: Subtle bug in do_basename

In what way is this a bug in R? It looks like a bug in the package, and as Defn.h is not part of R's API any packge using it is `at risk' (and cannot be installed in a binary-only installation, or even an installed version of R). In particular, Defn,.h depends on config.h, and it seems you installed a binary version of R and used separate sources. I would suggest building R from

Full_Name: Richard Boyce Version: 2.1.-1 OS: Debian testing/unstable Submission from: (NULL) (128.95.123.29) While building a custom package using a modified version of Duncan's REventLoop with R version 2.1 (Debian package r-base, r-base-dev) and R source from apt-get source 2.1.1 I get the following error: $ R CMD build vjREventLoop * checking for file

Hi, I'm hunting a bug in 3.0.x (tested on 3.0.10 and 3.0.20). Users can create and modfy files, but cannot delete them. The logs show [2005/09/21 20:48:14, 0, pid=18388, effective(4019, 412), real(4019, 0)] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(767) tdb(/srv/physik.fu-berlin.de/data/.samba/cluster1-test/cache/locking.tdb): expand_file ftruncate to 8192 failed (Permission denied) [2005/09/21 20:48:15, 0,

Hi, I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction. My samba version is samba-4.2.10-6.2.el7_2.x86_64. I have lots of daily core dumps (~20 on each machine daily) and I have no clear idea why. I'm including the stack trace below. It looks like the problem is related to "invalid lock_order". Any ideas? Thanks, Sergei #0 0x00007fc5a34945f7 in raise () from

We looked at this some more, and Andrew seemed to understand and wrote the attached patch. > > We got the logs by forcing smbd to run with -d10 by patching > file_server/fileserver.c. The issue appears to be in this call: 3638 /* Ensure there was no race condition. */ 3639 if (!check_same_stat(&smb_dname->st, &fsp->fsp_name->st)) { 3640

What's up fellows... I am a begginer in R and i am trying to find the parameters of one likelihood function, but when i otimize it, always appers a error or advertisement and the solve does not occur. The problem seems like that: "lMix<-function(pars,y){ beta1<-pars[1] beta2<-pars[2] beta3<-pars[3] beta4<-pars[4] beta5<-pars[5] alfa1<-pars[6]

Hi all, I've bought UPS FSP EP 850 because I have similar UPS, FSP EP 1000. It is working on my other server with with Fedora 14, kernel 2.6.35.14-106.fc14.x86_64 and installed nut-2.6.2-1. My new UPS is detected by kernel (see below lsusb output) and is partially detected by blazer_usb driver also. But it doesn't communicate with driver (see below blazer_usb output). I run all

Hi! Using this guide: http://blog.shadypixel.com/monitoring-a-ups-with-nut-on-debian-or-ubuntu-linux/ and systematically testing the usb capable driver on your site I managed to get my FSP EP650 (by http://www.fspgroupusa.com/ ) working (after reboot). Im running Ubuntu 9.10 desktop x64 standard install. This is the output from running "upsc ups1" ----- battery.voltage: 13.50

Hi there, We are thinking about sharing same files: - OS2/Win clients with Samba - Linux clients with NFS. So, the same files would be shared by 2 different protocols. Looking at the open.c samba code, there seems to be no check / no error (sharing violation) returned to the smb client when the file is already locked by an NFS client. - So, even if a file is opened and locked by an NFS client,

Hello, last friday I switched my users from an old server running 2.2.12 to a new one running 3.0.10 (that I've been testing myself and with smbtorture). After a while I had to switch back to the old server because some users were having serious problems. This is one of the logs (the others are very similar): [2005/03/04 12:25:05, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725)

Hi, I have started using symbolic links on an SMB share and find that symbolic links whose target no longer exists cannot be removed on the client side. Example, on the SMB client side in an SMB-mounted directory: 1. Create a file and a relative symlink to it: $ touch a $ ln -s a b $ ls -l total 0 -rw-rw-r--. 1 andi andi 0 Jan 6 14:42 a lrwxrwxrwx. 1 andi andi 1

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > ...and this one even has bug urls in all commit messages. Sorry for > forgetting this in the previous version. Juuuusttt *one* leetle change, sorry :-). I was following the changes to the talloc heirarchy in the code and realized that adding the following change made it much clearer (at least to me). diff --git

############################# In German : Hallo, gibt es da Jemanden der mir den folgenden Text vielleicht ein bischen besser erkl?ren kann? Habe dies aus dem Samba Developers Guide. Warum mach ich das nun? Ich habe ein Problem: Ich will das jedes mal wenn ein User versucht einen Ordner in der Freigabe zu verschieben oder umzubenenner, der nicht leer ist, eine Fehlermeldung auf dem Client

----- Forwarded message from Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> ----- From: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> To: samba-technical@samba.org Cc: jra@samba.org Subject: Patch to improve Samba write speeds on Linux ext3 with 3.2.x Reply-To: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> Hi all, Intel recently did some research on Samba write speeds, tested in Linux using ext3 resulting in the following

Hello! We have FSP DPV 1000 USB and we want to use NUT to get data from this UPS. Unfortunately we have only Windows and current Windows port doesn't have nutdrv_qx, which should support this UPS. Is there any possibility of getting nutdrv_qx for Windows? Please help.

So last week I was wondering if XFS was still working -- even with its last on-disk structure changes -- and it _suprisingly_ worked as expected. Right, now I can finally get rid of GRUB and use Syslinux to boot my Linux on EFI from a rootfs with xfs. Shit, I have two partitions (the first one being the required ESP) so there is no way to access the other partitions since because Syslinux does not

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:11:05PM +1300, Douglas Bagnall wrote: > We looked at this some more, and Andrew seemed to understand and wrote > the attached patch. Great catch you guys ! Thanks for taking a look, I've been busy on other stuff for the past few weeks. Let me go through the issue and proposed code *really* carefully :-). The open code can be really tricky (as you've

From: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> This patch finishes the MultiFS support. init_multifs gets called in the main (startup) function of ldlinux.c32, so MultiFS will be initialized automatically. init_multifs calls enable_multifs (lives in the core) to hook get_fs_info. Subsequent accesses will callback the get_fs_info living in ldlinux.c32. Signed-off-by: Raphael S.

T.D.Lee@durham.ac.uk wrote: > > > But we'd like to go one step further and have the return code from preexec > be used to continue or abort the connection being established. The script > above would be modified to generate this return code. > > Looking through the source code (smbd/service.c), it doesn't seem to check > the return code (calling smbrun to do the

Hi, We have a simple "Remote Procedure Call" mechanism that we are using to communicate between Windows computers and our Unix Samba server. The Windows application is proprietary software (Progress - not ours) and we have to work within the constraints of it. We have a Unix named pipe sitting in a Samba shared directory. We have a small C program that runs as a Unix daemon,