similar to: -std=c99 and inline semantics

Yes, you’re probably right about this. I was originally thinking of FENV_ACCESS as a fully strict mode of operation, but what you’re suggesting aligns with what Cameron suggested and even some of my own reasoning on other points. So, let me amend my previous proposal to say: STDC FENV_ACCESS {ON|OFF} Patch in progress. I think ON should force the following: except_behavior { strict }

Hello everyone, I have a function here that I wrote but doesn't seem to work quite right. Attached is the code. In the calib funcion under the for loop Bt[i+2]<-(1-m)*Bt[i+1]+Rt[i]*Rerr-Ct[i+1] returns NA's for everything after years 1983 and 1984. However the code works when it reads Bt[i+2]<-(1-m)*Bt[i+1]+Rt[i]*Rerr-Ct[i]. I don't quite understand why since it should be

Hello everyone, I have a function here that I wrote but doesn't seem to work quite right. Attached is the code. In the calib funcion under the for loop Bt[i+2]<-(1-m)*Bt[i+1]+Rt[i]*Rerr-Ct[i+1] returns NA's for everything after years 1983 and 1984. However the code works when it reads Bt[i+2]<-(1-m)*Bt[i+1]+Rt[i]*Rerr-Ct[i]. I don't quite understand why since it should be

Copying the list on a discussion of potentially general interest.... From: Kaylor, Andrew Sent: Friday, November 03, 2017 1:11 PM To: 'Ding, Wei' <Wei.Ding2 at amd.com>; Sumner, Brian <Brian.Sumner at amd.com>; Arsenault, Matthew <Matthew.Arsenault at amd.com> Subject: RE: clarification needed for the constrained fp implementation. Hi Wei, I've been meaning to

On 11/03/2017 05:26 PM, 陳韋任 via llvm-dev wrote: > > > 2017-11-04 4:29 GMT+08:00 Kaylor, Andrew via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>: > > Copying the list on a discussion of potentially general interest…. > > *From:* Kaylor, Andrew > *Sent:* Friday, November 03, 2017 1:11 PM > *To:* 'Ding,

+cfe-dev as the discussion is now biased toward C standard. I'm not sure what problem you see here. In default mode, i.e. > when there is no "#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS on" in effect, > then the compiler can always assume that the default rounding > mode is in effect. Well, if #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS on is not in effect, that means > that the user has promised that at

Dear all, In the process of investigating a performance difference between Clang & GCC when both compile the same non-toolchain program while using the "same"* compiler flags, I have found something that may be worth changing in Clang, developed a patch, and confirmed that the patch has its intended effect. *: "same" in quotes b/c the essence of the problem is that the

Hi all, This proposal is aimed at support of floating point environment, in which some properties like rounding mode or exception behavior differ from those used by default. This include in particular support of 'pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS', 'pragma STDC FENV_ROUND' as well as some other related facilities. Problem On many processors use of non-default floating mode requires

Both of these functions are using strlen() to create return value. Cheers, Scott Rankin *** /openbsd-compat/bsd-snprintf.c.orig Thu Oct 18 13:57:51 2001 --- /openbsd-compat/bsd-snprintf.c Thu Oct 18 13:58:26 2001 *************** *** 632,638 **** #endif /* !defined(HAVE_SNPRINTF) || !defined(HAVE_VSNPRINTF) */ #ifndef HAVE_VSNPRINTF ! int vsnprintf(char *str, size_t count, const char *fmt,

Right - I know you've had a discussion about the argv[0] stuff already, but I've written this simple script to simulate the (now missing) support for Debian, and was asked to send it to you... --- ssh-argv0 --- #! /bin/sh -e if [ "${0##*/}" == "ssh-argv0" ] then echo 'ssh-argv0: This script should not be run like this, see ssh-argv0(1) for details'

On 10/2/19 5:12 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: On 10/1/19 12:35 AM, Serge Pavlov via llvm-dev wrote: Hi all, This proposal is aimed at support of floating point environment, in which some properties like rounding mode or exception behavior differ from those used by default. This include in particular support of 'pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS', 'pragma STDC FENV_ROUND' as well as some other

The link http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/sftp/sftpversions.html On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Maria Shalet <mshalet at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Developers, > In the Open SSH package, we have only V3 of sftp. Here the > mode of transfer is only binary. > > According to the below link I find there are later versions > of the SFTP protocol that

On 15 March 2017 at 14:58, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > When you reverted r282259 in 282289, you also reverted the functional fix > to make the command-line option actually work. Right now it is broken. > Regardless of what else we do, we should fix this (we should probably > recommit r282259, with the default flipped, to pick up the fixes). We should run check-all

Hi, We are looking for new "Round Table" topics (i.e. mini-bof topics - formally known as hackers lab). The round table sessions are a great way for us all to discuss face-to-face any burning topics. We have scheduled a table after each BoF sessions so that people can follow up on those conversation-topics. We will also setup round tables during the event when there is interest (i.e.

> On Mar 15, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > On 03/15/2017 04:05 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: >> >>> On Mar 15, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 03/15/2017 01:47 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mar

The following code crashes after about 300 iterations on my?x86_64-w64-mingw32?machine on R 3.5.2 --vanilla.?? Others have duplicated this (see?https://github.com/tidyverse/magrittr/issues/190?if necessary), but I don't know how machine/OS-dependent it may be.?? If it doesn't crash for you, please try increasing the length of the x vector. Substituting the commented-out line for the one

Valgrind (without gctorture) reports memory misuse: % R --debugger=valgrind --debugger-args="--leak-check=full --num-callers=18" ... > x <- 1:200000 > y <- rep(letters[1:5], length(x) / 5L) > for (i in 1:1000) { + # x[y == 'a'] <- x[y == 'b'] + x <- `[<-`(x, y == 'a', x[y == 'b']) + cat(i, '') + } 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

I'm working on the #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON support, specifically the support for a strict version of the FP to unsigned int conversion. I've got a pass that runs and converts a new intrinsic into code that uses the FP to signed int conversion code similar to how SelectionDAG handles this now. Except that SelectionDAG will let the target handle it if the target says it will. How do I,

I've recently been looking at how to implement in LLVM IR the rounding of floating point values when casting using different rounding modes and I've hit some problems. It seems that when casting down floats to less precise types the ``fptrunc`` LLVM IR instruction is used. The LLVM language reference suggests that it just truncates the value (which would be equivalent to rounding towards

On 04/12/2018 01:40 AM, p23 power via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi, > We are looking for new "Round Table" topics (i.e. mini-bof topics - > formally known as hackers lab).  The round table sessions are a great > way for us all to discuss face-to-face any burning topics. We have > scheduled a table after each BoF sessions so that people can follow up > on those